
Immigration & Refugee judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal refused to resolve a dispute between a worker and an employer regarding immigration expenses, stating that the Employment Standards Branch has exclusive jurisdiction over such matters.
The Federal Court granted an application for judicial review, setting aside the Refugee Appeal Division's decision due to a breach of procedural fairness during a refugee hearing. The Court found that the breach was not cured by subsequent written submissions.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a refugee claim decision, affirming the Refugee Appeal Division's analysis of the Internal Flight Alternative and rejecting the claimants' arguments regarding the means of persecution and safety concerns.
The Federal Court granted an application for judicial review, overturning a refusal of a humanitarian and compassionate application for permanent residence based on gender-based harm. The court found that the officer misunderstood the claimant's evidence and submissions regarding gender-based harm in Bangladesh.
The Federal Court granted a visitor visa application after overturning an officer's refusal. The officer's decision was found unreasonable due to inadequate analysis of the claimant's financial situation and failure to consider the financial support offered by the claimant's father.
The Federal Court granted a judicial review, overturning a work permit refusal because the decision was found to be unreasonable and lacked proper consideration of the applicant's evidence.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review challenging the cessation of refugee protection status due to multiple returns to Pakistan. The court ruled that the Refugee Protection Division's decision was reasonable and that the presumption of reavailment was not rebutted.
The Federal Court rejected a refugee's application for permanent residency in Canada. The Court found that the Immigration Officer's decision was reasonable and that the applicant had a durable solution in another country.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of an officer's decision on a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment application. The court found the officer's decision reasonable, considering the claimant's immigration history and previous refugee claims.
In a recent decision, the Federal Court ruled that the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) lacked the authority to consider an application based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. The court found that the IAD did not have the necessary jurisdiction to review the case.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review, upholding the decision that the applicant had an internal flight alternative in Mérida, Mexico. The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to overturn the decision.