
Immigration & Refugee judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review application, upholding the denial of a refugee claim. The court determined that the applicant's testimony was not credible and did not sufficiently rebut the presumption of truthfulness.
A person applied for permanent residence and was told their application was incomplete because they did not submit certain documents. After submitting additional information, the decision was upheld without review of new evidence. The Federal Court ruled that this process was unfair and ordered a different officer to reconsider the case.
The Federal Court dismissed a claim for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, upholding an immigration officer's decision. The Court found the decision was reasonable, justified, transparent, and intelligible.
The Federal Court allowed a judicial review challenging the Refugee Protection Division's decision, finding the credibility determinations unreasonable and lacking coherence. The court emphasized the need for a coherent and rational analysis in such determinations.
The Federal Court rejected an application for a post-graduate work permit due to the applicant's failure to maintain full-time status during his studies. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to strict eligibility criteria.
The Federal Court rejected a claimant's application for humanitarian and compassionate grounds because they did not provide enough evidence to support their case.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review challenging a rejected refugee claim. The court found the decision was reasonable and supported by internally coherent and rational analysis, affirming the decision-maker's determination of no credible basis for the claimant's refugee claim.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a visa officer's decision, finding the officer failed to address contrary evidence regarding the financial stability and social ties of the applicants. The Court ordered the matter to be redetermined by a different decision-maker.
The Federal Court overturned a decision rejecting a Tamil refugee's request for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA). The Court found that the original decision unfairly dismissed important evidence, leading to the case being sent back for a fresh look by a different officer.