
Tax judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Federal Court rejected a couple's request for relief from penalties for filing their T1135 forms late. The court ruled that the couple did not show that circumstances beyond their control prevented them from filing on time. The court noted that the relevant information about penalties for late filing was readily available online.
The Tax Court of Canada rejected an appeal brought by an individual regarding an excess TFSA amount. The court found that the individual was liable for tax under s. 207.02 of the Income Tax Act, as they exceeded their TFSA contribution limit.
The Federal Court overturned a decision by the Minister of National Revenue denying tax relief and ordered the case to be reviewed again by a different official, giving the applicant a chance to submit additional information.
The Federal Court ruled that a tax decision by the Minister of National Revenue should be reconsidered after further information is provided. This case involves an advance pricing arrangement program where interest relief was denied.
The Tax Court of Canada ruled against allowing certain arguments related to foreign income tax in appeals, stating that these arguments could not be used if they were not part of the initial assessment by the Minister. This decision affects how tax disputes involving foreign income can proceed.
In this case, the Tax Court of Canada ruled in favour of a small business that had been reassessed by the a person for disallowed input tax credits and penalties. The court found that the business was entitled to these credits despite issues with its record-keeping practices.
The Tax Court of Canada ruled on whether an assessment issued under subsection 152(4.2) of a person abrogates all appeal rights when it includes a tax increase. The court decided that such an assessment does not automatically strip a person of their right to appeal.
In this case, the Tax Court dismissed an appeal by someone seeking GST/HST New Housing Rebates for two properties. The court found that there was not enough proof that these properties were intended or used as their main homes when purchased.