Claimant's Human Rights Complaint Dismissed Due to Non-Compliance
📌 In brief
A human rights complaint was dismissed because the claimant did not respond to communications from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal or meet the required deadlines. The decision highlights the importance of adhering to procedural rules when pursuing a case.
⚖️ Legal holding
A human rights complaint may be dismissed if the claimant fails to comply with procedural requirements and deadlines set by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
This section states that it is against the law to refuse to hire or continue to employ someone, or to treat an employee unfairly during their job, because of a prohibited reason like discrimination.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal dismissed a human rights complaint due to non-compliance and lack of response from the claimant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a human rights complaint due to the claimant’s failure to comply with procedural requirements and deadlines set by the tribunal, despite multiple attempts at communication.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne Citation: 2024 [NAME] 136 Date: December 11, 2024 File No. : T2562/11920 Between: [RESPONDENT] - and - Canadian Human Rights Commission Commission - and - [NAME] Respondent Decision Member: [NAME]. OVERVIEW [ 1 ] [RESPONDENT] , the [RESPONDENT], has failed to meet Tribunal deadlines to proceed with his complaint. Since May of 2024, the Tribunal has attempted to contact the [RESPONDENT] several times, but he has not responded to any of the Tribunal’s communications. [ 2 ] [NAME] ([NAME]), the Respondent, argues that the Tribunal should dismiss the complaint because the [RESPONDENT] has failed to pursue his complaint, has not respected the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure, 2021 SOR/2021-137 (the “Rules of Procedure”), has not met any deadlines and has not responded to the Tribunal’s numerous attempts at contact. [ 3 ] The Canadian Human Rights Commission (the “Commission”) did not make any submissions and is not participating in this matter.
II.
DECISION [ 4 ] The complaint is dismissed as abandoned. The [RESPONDENT] has not participated in the complaint process and has not responded to any of the Tribunal communications to advance the complaint.
III. ANALYSIS [ 5 ] The Tribunal must conduct proceedings as informally and expeditiously as the requirements of natural justice and the rules of procedure allow (s. 48.9(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act , R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6). The Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure are to be interpreted and applied to secure the informal, expeditious and fair determination of every inquiry on its merits. [ 6 ] Administrative tribunals are masters in their own house. The Tribunal can dismiss a complaint if a party does not comply with its Rules of Procedure (Rule 9) and can make any order it considers necessary against vexatious conduct or abuse of process (Rule 10). [ 7 ] It is the [RESPONDENT]’s responsibility to advance their file and to provide their contact information ( [NAME] v Correctional Service Canada , 2024 [NAME] 6 at paras 4–5; [NAME] v [COMPANY] , 2024 [NAME] 84 at para 11). The other parties are also entitled to have their complaints addressed in a timely way ( [NAME] v. [NAME]’azdli Whut’en First Nation, 2021 [NAME] 21 at para 39). Failing to appear or to otherwise participate in the process can result in a complaint being dismissed as abandoned ( [NAME] v. Correctional Service Canada , 2024 [NAME] 97). [ 8 ] At the beginning of May 2024, the Tribunal issued a ruling dismissing the Respondent’s request to stay the complaint proceedings until the resolution of all issues before the Federal Court. Following the ruling, on May 16, 2024, the Tribunal sent a letter setting deadlines for the Commission’s disclosure and for the [RESPONDENT] to file his Statements of Particulars, disclosure and witness lists. On June 14, 2024, the Tribunal granted an extension for the deadlines originally set. Some additional correspondence was sent to the parties, and, on September 6, 2024, the Tribunal spoke with the [RESPONDENT] by telephone, and he provided an updated email address. The Registry resent all of the Tribunal’s communications to the new email address the [RESPONDENT] provided. [ 9 ] On October 9, 2024, the Tribunal sent another letter setting a deadline of October 30, 2024, to respond, warning that in the absence of a response the complaint could be dismissed as abandoned. It sent its letter by email and courier, though the courier was unclaimed. It again tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by telephone and left a voicemail. [ 10 ] On December 2, 2024, the Tribunal wrote to the [RESPONDENT] by email and advised that in the absence of a response by December 6, 2024, his complaint would be dismissed as abandoned and his file would be closed. [ 11 ] In the absence of any response or indication from the [RESPONDENT] that they wish to proceed with their complaint, I find that this matter should be dismissed as abandoned. [ 12 ] The Tribunal has tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by every means available using the contact information the Commission provided , and I am satisfied the [RESPONDENT] received notice of these proceedings and the deadlines to advance his complaint . The Tribunal spoke with the [RESPONDENT] and resent its emails to the updated email address he provided. The Tribunal also warned the [RESPONDENT] that his complaint could be dismissed if he failed to respond. [ 13 ] I accept [NAME]’s submission that the [RESPONDENT] has, without explanation, failed to respond to the Tribunal’s numerous attempts to communicate with him and has not complied with his obligations under Rule 18 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure. I have not been presented with information about any challenges or personal circumstances faced by the [RESPONDENT] to explain his lack of participation in the process such that it would be unfair to dismiss the complaint.
IV.
ORDER [ 14 ] The complaint is dismissed as abandoned. The Registry will send a letter to the parties confirming that this file has been closed. Signed by [NAME] Tribunal Member Ottawa, Ontario December 11, 2024 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Parties of Record File No. : T2562/11920 Style of Cause: [RESPONDENT] v. [NAME] of the Tribunal dated: December 11, 2024 Written representations by: [NAME]. [NAME], [RESPONDENT] [NAME] and [RESPONDENT] , for the Respondent
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Human Rights Complaint Dismissed Due to Lack of Compliance
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Claimant’s Complaint Dismissed Due to Procedural Failures
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Claimant’s Human Rights Complaint Dismissed Due to Procedural Failures
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Claimant’s Complaint Dismissed Due to Lack of Participation
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Claimant’s Human Rights Case Dismissed Due to Procedural Failures
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Claimant’s Human Rights Case Dismissed Due to Lack of Participation
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Claimant’s Complaint Dismissed Due to Lack of Participation
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Complaint Dismissed: Claimant Failed to Participate in Human Rights Process
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Human Rights Complaint Dismissed Due to Lack of Participation
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Complaint Dismissed: Claimant Failed to Participate
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Human Rights Complaint Dismissed Due to Lack of Participation
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Complaint Dismissed: Importance of Procedural Compliance in Human Rights Ca…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The claimant did not comply with the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure.
- The claimant missed important procedural deadlines set by the Tribunal.
- The claimant failed to respond adequately to communications from the Tribunal.
- The claimant did not actively participate in the process as required.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The human rights complaint was dismissed due to non-compliance with tribunal procedures.
Who was involved?
A claimant and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the lack of response from the claimant justified dismissal as per procedural rules.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Rules of Procedure for the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The claimant's failure to respond and comply with deadlines was critical.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the claimant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
It is crucial to adhere strictly to procedural requirements and deadlines set by the tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
No specific evidence or documents were mentioned as critical.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Decisions can often be appealed, but it depends on the specifics of each case.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified lawyer for advice specific to your situation.
