VadeLab
DismissedCanadian Human Rights Tribunal·

Human Rights Complaint Dismissed Due to Lack of Compliance

Case No. 2024 CHRT 129 · Member Jennifer Khurana

📌 In brief

A human rights complaint was dismissed by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal because the complainant did not follow the rules, missed deadlines, and did not communicate with the tribunal. This highlights the need for claimants to stay engaged throughout the process.

⚖️ Legal holding

A complainant must comply with the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure and meet all set deadlines or risk having their case dismissed.

Topics

human rightscomplaint dismissal

Provisions

Canadian Human Rights Act, s. 7Rules of Procedure, 2021 SOR/2021-137

📖 What the law says

Canadian Human Rights Act s.7 — Employment

This rule says it is against the law for an employer to refuse to hire someone, fire them, or treat them unfairly during their job because of a prohibited reason.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The claimant's complaint was dismissed as abandoned due to non-compliance with Tribunal deadlines and failure to respond.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a complaint as abandoned due to the claimant's failure to comply with deadlines and respond to communications. The decision emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne Citation: 2024 [NAME] 129 Date: December 2, 2024 File No. : T2612/16920 Between: [RESPONDENT] - and - Canadian Human Rights Commission Commission - and - [NAME] Respondent Decision Member: [NAME]. OVERVIEW [ 1 ] [RESPONDENT] , the [RESPONDENT], has failed to meet Tribunal deadlines to proceed with their complaint. Since May of 2024, the Tribunal has attempted to contact the [RESPONDENT] several times, but they have not responded to any of the Tribunal’s communications. [ 2 ] [NAME] ([NAME]), the Respondent, argues that the Tribunal should dismiss the complaint because the [RESPONDENT] has failed to pursue their complaint, has not respected the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure, 2021 SOR/2021-137 (the “Rules of Procedure”), has not met any deadlines and has not responded to the Tribunal’s numerous attempts at contact. [ 3 ] The Canadian Human Rights Commission (the “Commission”) did not make any submissions and is not participating in this matter.

II.

DECISION [ 4 ] The complaint is dismissed as abandoned. The [RESPONDENT] has not participated in the complaint process, and they have not responded to any of the Tribunal communications to advance their complaint.

III. ANALYSIS [ 5 ] The Tribunal must conduct proceedings as informally and expeditiously as the requirements of natural justice and the rules of procedure allow (s. 48.9(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act , R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6). The Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure are to be interpreted and applied to secure the informal, expeditious and fair determination of every inquiry on its merits. [ 6 ] Administrative tribunals are masters in their own house. The Tribunal can dismiss a complaint if a party does not comply with its Rules of Procedure (Rule 9) and can make any order it considers necessary against vexatious conduct or abuse of process (Rule 10). [ 7 ] It is the [RESPONDENT]’s responsibility to advance their file and to provide their contact information ( [NAME] v Correctional Service Canada , 2024 [NAME] 6 at paras 4–5; [NAME] v Royal Bank of Canada , 2024 [NAME] 84 at para 11). The other parties are also entitled to have their complaints addressed in a timely way ( [NAME] v. [NAME], 2021 [NAME] 21 at para 39). Failing to appear or to otherwise participate in the process can result in a complaint being dismissed as abandoned ( [NAME] v. Correctional Service Canada , 2024 [NAME] 97). [ 8 ] At the beginning of May 2024, the Tribunal issued a ruling dismissing the Respondent’s request to stay the complaint proceedings until the resolution of all issues before the Federal Court. Following the ruling, on May 16, 2024, the Tribunal sent a letter setting deadlines for the Commission’s disclosure and for the [RESPONDENT] to file their Statements of Particulars, disclosure and witness lists. On June 14, 2024, the Tribunal granted an extension for the deadlines originally set. Some additional correspondence was sent to the parties, and, in September 2024, the Tribunal tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by telephone. The Registry had not sent the Tribunal’s earlier emails to the [RESPONDENT], so they were resent on September 6. Her spouse confirmed they had received the Tribunal’s communications. [ 9 ] The Tribunal also asked the Commission and the Respondent if they had another address for the [RESPONDENT] or were aware of any other way to reach them. The Commission and the Respondent did not provide any further information. [ 10 ] On October 9, 2024, the Tribunal sent another letter setting a deadline of October 18, 2024, to respond and warning that, in the absence of a response, the complaint could be dismissed as abandoned. It again tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by telephone but could not reach the [RESPONDENT] and could not leave a voicemail. [ 11 ] In the absence of any response or indication from the [RESPONDENT] that they wish to proceed with their complaint, I find that this matter should be dismissed as abandoned. [ 12 ] The Tribunal has tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by every means available using the contact information the Commission provided. The courier the Tribunal sent was returned but its emails were not returned as undeliverable. The Tribunal also warned the [RESPONDENT] that their complaint could be dismissed if they failed to respond. [ 13 ] I accept [NAME]’s submission that the [RESPONDENT] has, without explanation, failed to respond to the Tribunal’s numerous attempts to communicate with them and has not complied with their obligations under Rule 18 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure. I have not been presented with information about any challenges or personal circumstances faced by the [RESPONDENT] to explain their lack of participation in the process such that it would be unfair to dismiss the complaint. It is also the [RESPONDENT]’s responsibility to provide updated contact information. [ 14 ] In the absence of any response or indication from the [RESPONDENT] that they wish to proceed with their complaint, I find that this matter should be dismissed as abandoned .

IV.

ORDER [ 15 ] The complaint is dismissed as abandoned. The Registry will send a letter to the parties confirming that this file has been closed. Signed by [NAME] Tribunal Member Ottawa, Ontario December 2, 2024 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Parties of Record File No. : T2612/16920 Style of Cause: [RESPONDENT] v. [NAME] of the Tribunal dated: December 2, 2024 Written representations by: [NAME]. [NAME], [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] , for the Respondent

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The claimant did not respond to any of the Tribunal’s communications despite multiple attempts to contact them.
  • The claimant failed to pursue their complaint and did not respect the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure.
  • It is the claimant’s responsibility to advance their file and provide contact information.
  • The Tribunal was not presented with any explanation for the claimant's lack of participation.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The complaint was dismissed as abandoned.

Who was involved?

A complainant and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC).

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal decided that the claimant had not responded to communications or met deadlines, leading to dismissal.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Rules of Procedure, 2021 SOR/2021-137 and Canadian Human Rights Act, s. 7.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The claimant's failure to comply with procedural requirements and deadlines.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

Against the complainant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

It means they must adhere strictly to tribunal rules and respond promptly to communications.

What evidence or documents mattered?

None specifically mentioned, but compliance with deadlines and communication are crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions can often be appealed, but it depends on the specific circumstances.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is advisable to consult a qualified lawyer for advice on your specific situation.

Official source: Canadian Human Rights Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. It is a reproduction of an official work published by the Government of Canada, and the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, the Government of Canada. It is not an official version.