VadeLab
DismissedCanadian Human Rights Tribunal·

Claimant’s Complaint Dismissed Due to Lack of Participation

Case No. 2024 CHRT 130 · Member Jennifer Khurana

📌 In brief

A person’s human rights complaint was dismissed because they did not follow the procedures set out by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, including responding to communications and meeting deadlines. This highlights the importance of adhering to procedural rules when pursuing a case.

⚖️ Legal holding

A complainant must comply with the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure to advance their case.

Topics

human rightsprocedural compliance

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Canadian Human Rights Act s.7 — Employment

This rule says that it is against the law for an employer to refuse to hire or keep someone employed, or to treat an employee unfairly, because of a prohibited reason like discrimination.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The claimant's complaint was dismissed as abandoned due to non-compliance with procedural rules and lack of participation.

📜 Headnote Official document

The claimant's complaint was dismissed as abandoned by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal due to non-compliance with procedural rules and failure to participate in the process. The Tribunal warned that failing to respond could result in dismissal.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne Citation: 2024 [NAME] 130 Date: December 2, 2024 File No. : T2614/17120 Between: [RESPONDENT] - and - Canadian Human Rights Commission Commission - and - [NAME] Respondent Decision Member: [NAME]. OVERVIEW [ 1 ] [RESPONDENT] , the [RESPONDENT], has failed to meet Tribunal deadlines to proceed with their complaint. Since May of 2024, the Tribunal has attempted to contact the [RESPONDENT] several times, but they have not participated in their complaint process or complied with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure, 2021 SOR/2021-137 (the “Rules of Procedure”) to advance their case. [ 2 ] [NAME] ([NAME]), the Respondent, argues that the Tribunal should dismiss the complaint because the [RESPONDENT] has failed to pursue their complaint, has not respected the Rules of Procedure, has not met any deadlines and has not responded to the Tribunal’s numerous attempts at contact. [ 3 ] The Canadian Human Rights Commission (the “Commission”) did not make any submissions and is not participating in this matter.

II.

DECISION [ 4 ] The complaint is dismissed as abandoned. The [RESPONDENT] has not participated in the complaint process, and they have not responded to any of the Tribunal communications to advance their complaint.

III. ANALYSIS [ 5 ] The Tribunal must conduct proceedings as informally and expeditiously as the requirements of natural justice and the rules of procedure allow (s. 48.9(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act , R.S.C., 1985, c. H-6). The Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure are to be interpreted and applied to secure the informal, expeditious and fair determination of every inquiry on its merits. [ 6 ] Administrative tribunals are masters in their own house. The Tribunal can dismiss a complaint if a party does not comply with its Rules of Procedure (Rule 9) and can make any order it considers necessary against vexatious conduct or abuse of process (Rule 10). [ 7 ] It is the [RESPONDENT]’s responsibility to advance their file and to provide their contact information ( [NAME] v Correctional Service Canada , 2024 [NAME] 6 at paras 4–5; [NAME] v [[COMPANY] , 2024 [NAME] 84 at para 11). The other parties are also entitled to have their complaints addressed in a timely way ( [NAME] v. [NAME], 2021 [NAME] 21 at para 39). Failing to appear or to otherwise participate in the process can result in a complaint being dismissed as abandoned ( [NAME] v. Correctional Service Canada , 2024 [NAME] 97). [ 8 ] At the beginning of May 2024, the Tribunal issued a ruling dismissing the Respondent’s request to stay the complaint proceedings until the resolution of all issues before the Federal Court. Following the ruling, on May 16, 2024, the Tribunal sent a letter setting deadlines for the Commission’s disclosure and for the [RESPONDENT] to file their Statements of Particulars, disclosure and witness lists. On June 14, 2024, the Tribunal granted an extension for the deadlines originally set. Some additional correspondence was sent to the parties, and, in September 2024, the Tribunal tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by telephone and left a voicemail. [ 9 ] On September 6, 2024, the [RESPONDENT] wrote to the Tribunal updating his email address and asking for clarification about next steps. On September 9, 2024, the Tribunal again wrote to the [RESPONDENT] and warned that the case may be dismissed as abandoned if they did not confirm their intention to pursue their complaint or otherwise respond by September 13, 2024. The Tribunal also asked the Commission and the Respondent if they had another address for the [RESPONDENT] or were aware of any other way to reach them. The Commission and the Respondent did not provide any further information. [ 10 ] The Registry resent its September 6, 2024 correspondence to the [RESPONDENT] at his updated email address on September 11, 2024. [ 11 ] On October 9, 2024, the Tribunal sent another letter setting a deadline of October 18, 2024, to respond and warning that, in the absence of a response, the complaint could be dismissed as abandoned. It again tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by telephone but could not leave a voicemail. [ 12 ] In the absence of any response or indication from the [RESPONDENT] that they wish to proceed with their complaint, I find that this matter should be dismissed as abandoned. The Tribunal has tried to reach the [RESPONDENT] by every means available using the contact information the Commission provided. The courier the Tribunal sent was returned but its emails were not returned as undeliverable, and the [RESPONDENT] even corresponded with the Tribunal in early September by email, confirming that he was aware of the complaint process. The Tribunal also warned the [RESPONDENT] that their complaint could be dismissed if they failed to respond. [ 13 ] I accept [NAME]’s submission that the [RESPONDENT] has, without explanation, failed to respond to the Tribunal’s numerous attempts to communicate with them and has not complied with their obligations under Rule 18 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure. I have not been presented with information about any challenges or personal circumstances faced by the [RESPONDENT] to explain their lack of participation in the process such that it would be unfair to dismiss the complaint. It is also the [RESPONDENT]’s responsibility to participate in his own complaint process. [ 14 ] In the absence of any response or indication from the [RESPONDENT] that they wish to proceed with their complaint, I find that this matter should be dismissed as abandoned .

IV.

ORDER [ 15 ] The complaint is dismissed as abandoned. The Registry will send a letter to the parties confirming that this file has been closed. Signed by [NAME] Tribunal Member Ottawa, Ontario December 2, 2024 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Parties of Record File No. : T2614/17120 Style of Cause: [RESPONDENT] v. [NAME] of the Tribunal dated: December 2, 2024 Written representations by: [NAME]. [NAME], [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] , for the Respondent

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The claimant did not comply with the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure.
  • The claimant missed important procedural deadlines set by the Tribunal.
  • The claimant failed to respond to communications from the Tribunal.
  • The claimant did not actively participate in the process as required.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The claimant's complaint was dismissed as abandoned.

Who was involved?

A complainant and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC).

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal decided that the lack of participation by the claimant justified dismissal due to non-compliance with procedural rules.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Canadian Human Rights Act, s. 7; Rules of Procedure for the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that the claimant failed to comply with procedural requirements and did not respond to communications from the tribunal.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

Against the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

It means that failing to comply with procedural rules and deadlines can result in dismissal of their complaint.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The claimant's lack of response to tribunal communications was key.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal can typically be appealed to the Federal Court of Canada.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is advisable to consult with a qualified lawyer to understand your rights and options.

Official source: Canadian Human Rights Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. It is a reproduction of an official work published by the Government of Canada, and the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, the Government of Canada. It is not an official version.