VadeLab

Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims case law

Judgments from the Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 08, 2026

Claim Dismissed for Being Out of Time Under Limitation Act

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 08, 2026

Claimant Successfully Enforces Contract and Receives Damages for Breach of Contract

Allowed in PartCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 08, 2026

Claimant Seeks Payment for LED Panels Invoices

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 08, 2026

Tenant Wins Damage Deposit Refund in Small Claims Case

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 08, 2026

Roommate Dispute Over Damage Deposit Resolved by Civil Resolution Tribunal

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 08, 2026

Repair Costs Claim Dismissed in Used Vehicle Sale

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 08, 2026

Claim for Reassessment of Liability and Increased Premiums Rejected by Civil Resolution Tribunal

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Contractor's Payment Claim Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence

In a recent British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal case, a contractor claimed payment for work completed on a property development. However, the claim was dismissed because the contractor failed to provide adequate evidence to support the claim.

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Driveway Installation Dispute Dismissed Due to Lack of Expert Evidence

A homeowner hired a contractor to install a new driveway. The homeowner claimed the work was substandard but could not provide expert evidence to support her claims. The Tribunal dismissed the homeowner's allegations.

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Hot Tub Warranty Dispute Decided by Civil Resolution Tribunal

Allowed in PartCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Claimant Proves Assault and Battery but Fails to Prove Theft of Pet

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Tenant's Damage Deposit Claim Against Property Manager Dismissed

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Claimant Wins Trespass Damage Case at Civil Resolution Tribunal

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Claimant Wins Damages for Increased Insurance Premiums Due to Unreasonable Decision

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 07, 2026

Claim Dismissed for Being Out of Time Under Limitation Act

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 06, 2026

Claimant Wins Gas Line Damage Case at Civil Resolution Tribunal

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 06, 2026

Debt Collection Case: Respondent Ordered to Pay Claimant $1,888.24

In a recent BC Small Claims case, the Civil Resolution Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant $1,888.24, including $1,500 as debt, $213.24 in pre-judgment interest, and $175 in CRT fees, despite the respondent's financial difficulties.

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 06, 2026

Claimant Wins Payment Dispute Over Property Assessment Services

DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 06, 2026

Claimant's Insurance Deductible Refund Claim Dismissed

The claimant requested a refund of their insurance deductible after being involved in a car accident. However, the Tribunal decided against granting the refund because there wasn't enough evidence to support the claimant's account of the incident.

AllowedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·May 05, 2026

Tenant Wins Damage Deposit Return in Roommate Mold Dispute

A tenant who left a damage deposit was able to recover it after moving out due to mold discovery. The Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled that the landlord failed to prove the deposit was used to cover legitimate damages beyond normal wear and tear.

← PreviousPage 11 · 655 judgmentsNext →