Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims case law
Judgments from the Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.
Small Claims BC: Claim Dismissed for Incorrect Respondent
Service Provider Wins Payment Dispute at Civil Resolution Tribunal
Debt Claim Refused Due to Ongoing Bankruptcy Proceedings
Dental Damages Claim Against Bakery Dismissed
Tribunal Refuses to Resolve Flight Cancellation Claim
Lease Claims Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence in Small Claims Case
Consumer Wins Full Refund for Missing Mandatory Information in Contract
A consumer successfully claimed a full refund after proving that the contract for a snowmobiling trip lacked certain mandatory information required by the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act (BPCPA).
Renovation Defect Claims and Unpaid Labour Counterclaim Dismissed
Claim for Vet Bills After Dog Attack Dismissed by Civil Resolution Tribunal
Small Claims Ruling: Payment for Services Rendered Without Formal Contract
In a small claims case, the Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled that the respondent must pay the claimant $1,017.28 for glass door installation services, despite the lack of a formal contract and complaints about poor customer service.
Claimant Wins Payment for Services Rendered
Claim for Legal Services Fees Dismissed by Civil Resolution Tribunal
Claimant's Request for Deductible Reimbursement Dismissed
Substandard Upholstery Work Results in Partial Refund - Small Claims
Claimant Wins Unpaid Invoices but Loses Termination Fee Dispute
Claimant Wins Kiln Recovery Case in BC Small Claims
In a recent BC Small Claims case, the claimant successfully recovered a kiln from the respondent. The respondent refused to return the kiln without payment, but the Tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant.
Claimant Wins Vehicle Conversion Case in Civil Resolution Tribunal
In a recent Civil Resolution Tribunal case, the claimant successfully proved that the respondent wrongfully kept her vehicle after their separation. The claimant was awarded damages equivalent to the vehicle's market value at the time of interference, totaling $1,370.35.