Tenancy Tribunal Decision: Cleaning Costs and Damage Liability
📌 In brief
In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal addressed issues of cleaning costs, damage liability, and bond repayment in a dispute between tenants and landlords. The tribunal ruled on specific damages and cleaning expenses based on evidence presented by both parties.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is liable for damages that are not fair wear and tear and must prove they did not cause the damage carelessly or intentionally.
📖 What the law says
This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, notifying the landlord of damage or repair needs, and leaving the premises clean and tidy when moving out.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled on cleaning costs, damage claims, and bond repayment.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled on a dispute between tenants and landlords regarding cleaning costs, damage claims, and bond repayment. The decision found the tenants responsible for certain damages but not others.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480831 1
[2026] NZTT 5480831, 5475514
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted] For [COUNSEL] And [COUNSEL]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: Unit/[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] to pay [COMPANY] As Agent For [COUNSEL] And [COUNSEL] $841.47 from the bond, calculated as shown in table below.
2. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,280.00 (BN-16864290) immediately apportioned as follows:
[COMPANY] As Agent For [COUNSEL] And [COUNSEL]:
$1,273.47
[RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT]: $1,006.53
Description Landlord Tenant Cleaning $260.00 Painting maintenance $215.62 Carpet in bedroom Bench top
$217.85 $552.00
Filing fee reimbursement $28.00 Total award $1,273.47
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480831 2
Bond $1,273.47 $1,006.53
Reasons:
1. Both parties attended the hearing. The tenants I am told were both represented by [RESPONDENT].
2. The landlord has applied for compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.
3. The tenants have applied to have their bond refunded.
4. This tenancy commenced on 14 September 2021 and the property was new at the commencement of the tenancy.
Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?
5. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, and remove all rubbish, See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
6. The tenant produced evidence of the costs they incurred to have the property cleaned. However, accepted that if further cleaning was required then the invoice was accepted. The cleaning by and large was to the expected standard however there was other areas that required cleaning, such as the oven.
7. The amounts ordered are proved.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
8. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
9. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.
10. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480831 3
11. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
12. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
13. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. [NAME] v [NAME] [2019] NZHC 1541.
Is the tenant responsible for the Kitchen floor?
14. The landlord claims the cost of $120.00 to patch repair the flooring in the kitchen where a pot had chipped part of the flooring. It was a small area, and the tenant remembered it happening. Saying he dropped a large pot.
15. The landlord claims it was careless. That the floor was new at the commencement of the tenancy and the damage clearly caused because of carelessness.
16. The tenant says that the kitchen is an area of high usage and during a tenancy of four and a half years that it is fair wear and tear. He indicated it was an accident in that he dropped the pot.
17. Accidental damage is damage that occurs unexpectedly and unintentional without negligence or failure to take reasonable care.
18. There is no evidence that the tenant was not taking reasonable care, and the dropping of the pot was a one off accident. The only evidence in relation to how it occurred was that it slipped from the tenants’ hands, there is no evidence he was being careless in his actions.
19. On the balance of probabilities, I therefore find that the claim is not proven.
Is the tenant responsible for the carpet in bedroom?
20. The landlord has sought a contribution for the replacement carpet in one of the bedrooms. The figure sought includes depreciation. The insurance excess was above the amount required and therefore was not able to be claimed.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480831 4
21. The tenant claims it was a high use area and again fair wear and tear. However, the damage was due to a four-legged chair, used as an office chair.
22. I find that this damage is recoverable as the tenant repeatedly used the chair causing ongoing damage and took no steps to protect the carpet from the chair legs.
23. I accept that the damage is therefore proven as the tenant should have taken more care to protect the carpet with the use of the chair and clearly damage this chair caused over the period of the tenancy die to being careless.
24. On the balance of probabilities, I therefore accept that it is more than fair wear and tear and the claim as proven.
Is the tenant responsible for the painting of rooms
25. The landlord claims for the cost to repaint walls that was required as the tenant had attempted to fix and paint themselves and it was mismatched. The tenant accepted the costs as sought.
Is the tenant responsible for the kitchen bench top
26. The damage to the new bench top was a chip and deep scratch in the same area.
27. The tenant again submitted that it was fair wear and tear. However, he did not recall how it happened or when it happened so there is no evidence to show it was not careless damage, therefore I must find that it is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
28. The amounts ordered are proved.
29. I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.
30. [COMPANY] As Agent For [COUNSEL] [NAME] [COUNSEL] And [COUNSEL] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480831 5
[NAME]
05 June 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480831 6
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5480831 7
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Orders Tenant to Pay Damages for Damage and Cleaning
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay $621.97 for Property Damage
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Terminated Due to Tenant’s Absence at Hearing
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant's Tenancy Terminated Due to Rent Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Terminates Tenancy for Rent Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent and Water Rates Arrears After Non-Compliance
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant’s Rent Arrears Limited Due to Incarceration and Landlord’s Delay
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears; Cleaning Claim Rejected
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Must Repay Rent Arrears or Face Eviction
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Orders Tenant to Pay Water Rates and Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenant is not required to pay rent while incarcerated.
- Tenant must leave premises reasonably clean and tidy at the end of tenancy.
- Tenant can terminate tenancy if there are at least 21 days of rent arrears.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision determined the amount to be paid from the bond for cleaning costs and damage claims.
Who was involved?
Tenants and landlords were involved in a dispute over property conditions at the end of a tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on evidence presented regarding fair wear and tear and careless actions by tenants.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 40(2)(a) and 49B of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The central reasoning focused on whether damages were due to fair wear and tear or careless actions by tenants.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partly in favour of the landlord, as some claims were upheld while others were not.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants should be aware that they may be liable for damages beyond fair wear and tear if they cannot prove otherwise.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of cleaning costs, damage assessments, and tenant actions were crucial to the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions can be appealed within 10 working days using an appeal form.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for such cases.
