Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that tenants must pay rent arrears and damages for leaving a property in poor condition, failing to clean it properly or remove rubbish as required by law at the end of their tenancy. The tribunal found them liable for cleaning costs and damage beyond fair wear and tear.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is liable for rent arrears, cleaning costs, and damage beyond fair wear and tear when they breach their obligations at the end of a tenancy.
📖 What the law says
This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and leaving the premises in a reasonably clean condition with all rubbish removed when the tenancy ends.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered tenants to pay rent arrears and damages for property left in poor condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenants to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the property in poor condition, failing to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy. The tribunal found that the tenants were responsible for cleaning costs and damage beyond fair wear and tear.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5435413 1
[2026] NZTT 5435413
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT MANUKAU | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI MANUKAU
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] must pay Kāinga Ora– [APPELLANT[NAME] $8,948.64 immediately, being rent arrears to 27 November 2025.
Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears $106.71 Rubbish removal: Interior $2,791.57 Rubbish removal: Exterior $3,943.50 Cleaning property $577.58 Cleaning: Kitchen cupboard $104.26 Repairs: Rehang kitchen cabinet door $64.98 Replace furnishings: Lounge carpet $479.13 Replace furnishings: Lay carpet underlay $118.68 Repairs: Patch toilet wall hole $40.16 Repairs: Holes in hallway, bedroom 1, 2 & 4 $160.64 Repairs: Door bedroom 5 priming $5.48 Repairs: Bedroom 5 holes $160.64 Replace furnishings: Oven $395.31 Total award $8,948.64 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $8,948.64
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5435413 2
Reasons:
1. The Landlord attended the hearing. The Tenants did not appear.
2. The Landlord has applied for rent arrears and compensation.
3. At the hearing, the Landlord withdrew their claim for rehanging the bathroom cabinet door.
How much is owed for rent arrears?
4. The tenancy ended on 27 November 2025. The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy.
Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?
5. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.
6. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, and did not remove all rubbish. The Tenant left a substantial amount of rubbish in and outside of the property which included furniture, bags of rubbish, a large speaker wheelbarrows, mattresses, a suitcase, pallets, mats containers and industry vacuums. The outside shed was full of rubbish and the council bins required emptying. There was 17 cubic metres of rubbish inside the property and 22 cubic meters of rubbish outside the property. An exit report was provided which substantiated the claim.
7. The Tenant also did not clean the house. The walls required cleaning, window sills needed wiping down and the carpets were dirty. It appeared as if no cleaning was attempted. The bathroom was particularly dirty and the kitchen cupboards required scrubbing.
8. The amounts ordered are proved.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
9. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
10. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5435413 3
damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.
11. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
12. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
13. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
14. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. [NAME] v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.
15. The following damage was caused during the tenancy: removal of the lounge carpet, staining of the hallway carpet, loose kitchen cabinet door, holes to the hallway, toilet bedroom 1, 2, 4 and 5 walls, bedroom 5 door required painting and priming and the oven stove top was not working due to rust and being burnt through. Entry and exit inspection photographs were provided to substantiate the costs and a work order.
16. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage in relation to the lounge carpet, kitchen and bathroom cabinet doors, holes to the walls, bedroom 5 door and oven,
17. In relation to the carpet damage to the hallway, the Landlord claimed these were heavily stained to the extent they required replacing however upon perusal of the exit inspection photographs, I did not find the staining to be so extensive it required carpet replacement. The Landlord showed fraying carpet by one bedroom however nothing further to justify replacement of the entire hallway carpet. I also did not see any evidence of attempts to clean the stains before replacing the carpet. The Landlord suspected there was a dog that resided at the property, in breach of the tenancy agreement however they did not confirm that the carpet replacement was due to dog urine or faeces which would not have been visible in the photographs. For this reason, I have not awarded the claim for the hallway carpet replacement.
18. The claim is dismissed for the hallway carpet.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5435413 4
19. I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.
[NAME]
03 June 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5435413 5
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5435413 6
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Landlord $11,072.76 in Cleaning and Repair Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay $2,875 in Vacated Costs After Moving Out
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Wins Exemplary Damages for Rental Bidding at Tenancy Tribunal
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Allows Landlord to Recover Rent and End Tenancy
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay for Water Rates and Property Damages
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Damages After Illegal Cannabis Grow
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Terminates Boarding House Tenancy Due to Misconduct
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenant is liable for rent arrears.
- Tenant responsible for leaving premises reasonably clean and removing rubbish.
- Tenant liable for damage beyond fair wear and tear.
- Landlord entitled to terminate tenancy if tenant breaches obligations repeatedly.
- Tenant liable for repair expenses due to non-compliance with end-of-tenancy obligations.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered tenants to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving a property in poor condition.
Who was involved?
A landlord brought the case against tenants who failed to comply with their obligations at the end of tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal found that the tenants were responsible for rent arrears, cleaning costs, and damage beyond fair wear and tear.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 40(1)(e) and 40(2)(a) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 were cited.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenants did not leave the property reasonably clean, remove rubbish, or repair damages beyond fair wear and tear.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was in favour of the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants must comply with their obligations at the end of tenancy to avoid liability for damages and cleaning costs.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Rent records, exit inspection reports, photographs, and work orders were provided as evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, both parties can appeal the decision within 10 working days to the District Court.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for specific guidance on your situation.
