
Employment Law judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In a recent case at the Employment Tribunal, the judge ruled that an employer must not make unauthorised wage deductions or fail to pay employees their full holiday entitlement. The decision supports the rights of workers to receive fair compensation and benefits.
The Employment Judge determined that the claimant did not meet the criteria for disability under the Equality Act 2010 due to their conditions of PTSD and photosensitivity. This ruling affects claims related to discrimination in the workplace based on disability status.
The Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of workers who claimed their employer failed to comply with trade union rights and breached contractual obligations. The tribunal ordered the employer to provide financial compensation for these breaches.
The Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of a a person who resigned due to workplace bullying, poor management, and lack of support for her mental a person issues. She was awarded compensation for unfair dismissal and unpaid wages.
In this case, an individual brought several complaints against the police force alleging disability discrimination. However, the Employment Tribunal dismissed all these complaints as they did not meet the legal requirements under the Equality Act 2010.
The Employment Tribunal allowed a worker's request to amend their claim, permitting additional claims related to disability discrimination, victimisation, and failure to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010. The decision was based on the balance of justice despite the amendment being out-of-time.
An employee successfully sued their former employer for wrongful dismissal because they were not paid during their notice period. The judge awarded them over £7,400 in compensation.
An Employment Tribunal in Dundee refused an application by a worker seeking interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act. The claimant alleged automatic unfair dismissal due to protected disclosures but failed to provide sufficient evidence that the main reason for their dismissal was related to these disclosures.
An employment tribunal in London rejected a worker's unfair dismissal case against their employer, an online retailer. The judge ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove unfair dismissal according to the Employment Rights Act 1996.
An employee claimed they were unfairly dismissed by their employer due to various issues at work. However, the Employment Tribunal found that there was no evidence of a serious breach of trust and confidence, leading them to dismiss both the unfair dismissal claim and the claims regarding unauthorised wage deductions.
An Employment Tribunal in East London heard a case involving several complaints made by a person against their employer and other parties regarding discrimination and unjustifiable discipline. The tribunal dismissed most of these complaints, while some were struck out due to the lack of reasonable prospects for success.
An employment tribunal struck out a worker's unfair dismissal complaint because they had been employed for less than two years. Under UK law, workers must have at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
In this case, workers brought claims against their employer for sex discrimination, victimisation, and whistleblowing protection. However, the Employment Tribunal dismissed all these claims after finding insufficient evidence to support them.
In this case, an employment tribunal ruled against a worker who claimed they faced disability discrimination and were unfairly dismissed. The tribunal found that while the employer had made some accommodations for the worker's disabilities, their policies did not amount to discrimination or unfair dismissal.
In this case, an employment tribunal dismissed claims brought by a worker under the Employment Rights Act because they were not filed within the required time frame. However, the tribunal allowed claims made under the Equality Act to proceed as it was deemed just and equitable to extend jurisdiction in these circumstances.
In this case, the Employment Tribunal denied a worker’s request for interim relief. The judge ruled that the claimant did not meet the criteria set out in section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to receive temporary support while their main employment dispute is being resolved.
The Employment Judge dismissed the worker's unfair dismissal claim against their employer and related entities because they hadn't worked there long enough to qualify under employment law. This decision highlights the importance of meeting statutory requirements before bringing such a case.
In this case, the Employment Tribunal found that the employer had made unlawful wage deductions and failed to provide proper notice or holiday pay to the employee. The tribunal awarded the claimant £5,662.26 in compensation.
An employment tribunal in Croydon dismissed a claim brought by an employee alleging unfair dismissal due to alleged misconduct. The tribunal ruled that the employer’s decision to dismiss was reasonable, considering the clear policies against theft and dishonesty, and within the range of acceptable responses for a reasonable employer.
In a case before the Employment Tribunal in Glasgow, the judge ruled that there was no legally binding employment contract between an employee and their potential employer because the employee did not meet all of the required conditions set out in the offer letter. The claimant's attempt to sue for breach of contract failed as a result.