VadeLab
AllowedEmployment Tribunal·england-and-wales·

Workers Win Case Against Employer for Wage Deductions and Holiday Pay

Case No. · Judge Tynan

📌 In brief

In a recent case at the Employment Tribunal, the judge ruled that an employer must not make unauthorised wage deductions or fail to pay employees their full holiday entitlement. The decision supports the rights of workers to receive fair compensation and benefits.

⚖️ Legal holding

An employer must not make unauthorised deductions from an employee's wages or fail to pay their holiday entitlement.

Topics

unauthorized wage deductionsholiday pay

Provisions

s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996reg 3 Working Time Regulations 1998

📖 Technical summary

The Employment Judge ruled in favour of the claimants, finding that the respondents made unauthorised wage deductions and failed to pay holiday entitlement.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Employment Judge found that the employer made unauthorised deductions from the workers' wages and failed to pay their holiday entitlement, ruling in favour of the workers.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Case Number: 3303887-9/2025

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Claimant: [redacted]

[NAME]

Mr [APPELLANT]

Respondent: [redacted] 2. [COMPANY]

1. The claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 10 Jul 2025. The respondents have failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claims, in accordance with rule 22 of the Procedure Rules.

2. The respondents have made unauthorised deductions from the claimants’ wages and they are jointly and severally liable to pay them the following sums:

a. To the first claimant, the gross amount of £3,083.33; b. To the [NAME] claimant, the gross amount of £2,767.60; and c. To the [NAME] claimant, the gross amount of £3,145.00.

3. The respondents have additionally failed to pay the claimants’ holiday entitlement and are jointly and severally liable to pay them the following sums:

a. 142.33 to the first claimant; b. £101.54 to the [NAME] claimant; and c. £115.36. to the [NAME] claimant.

4. In summary, the respondents must pay the first claimant £3,225.66, the [NAME] claimant £2,869.14 and the [NAME] claimant £3,260.36 in total.

Approved by:

Employment Judge Tynan

20 April 2026

JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON

27 May 2026 .....................................................................

................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Public access to Employment Tribunal decisions

Judgments and Reasons for the Judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the Claimant(s) and Respondent(s) in a case.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Employer made unauthorised deductions from wages.
  • Employer failed to pay the employee's holiday entitlements.
  • Employer breached contractual notice periods.
  • Employer did not comply with statutory requirements regarding wage and holiday payments.
  • Employer failed to consult adequately when making redundancies affecting 20 or more employees within 90 days.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision found in favour of the workers, ruling that the employer must not make unauthorised wage deductions or fail to pay their full holiday entitlement.

Who was involved?

The case involved workers and an employer.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on evidence showing that the employer made unauthorised wage deductions and failed to pay holiday entitlement, violating employment laws.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Employment Rights Act 1996 and Working Time Regulations 1998 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The central reasoning was based on the employer's failure to comply with wage protection laws and holiday pay regulations.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the workers.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Workers facing unauthorised wage deductions or unpaid holiday entitlement should seek legal advice to protect their rights.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence showing unauthorised wage deductions and failure to pay holiday entitlement was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the Employment Tribunal can typically be appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is highly recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: Employment Tribunal — england-and-wales headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Employment Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.