First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) case law
Judgments from the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.
First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate for Manchester Flat
First-tier Tribunal Rejects Claimant’s Objection to Nearby Telecoms Apparatus
The claimant objected to a telecoms mast installed near her home, arguing it harmed the outlook and value of her property. However, the First-tier Tribunal dismissed the objection, ruling that the mast did not significantly affect the character or amenity of the area or the market value of the property.
Tribunal Sets New Rent for Intermediate Tenancy
First-tier Tribunal Determines Service Charges Owed by Tenant
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant owes £23,385.92 in service charges to their landlord for the period from 2019 to 2025. However, the tribunal did not determine what payments had been made or how these should be applied.
Tribunal Rules on Service Charge Liability for Tenants
Tenant Wins Service Charge Dispute Over Late Notification
The tenant successfully argued in court that they did not have to pay service charges because they were notified about them too late. The tribunal agreed, ruling that the invoices were invalid due to the delay.
Tribunal Sets £1850 Rent for Assured Tenancy in Barnet
A tenant asked the First-tier Tribunal to determine their rent after receiving a notice from their landlord proposing an increase. The tribunal considered the evidence and local rental market conditions before setting the rent at £1850 per month, effective May 2026.
Tribunal Sets £2800/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in NW6
Tribunal sets £1500/month rent for assured tenancy in Croydon
Tribunal Sets £1800/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Southall
Landlord Granted Retroactive Permission for Urgent Roof Maintenance
Landlord Wins Fire Alarm Repair Dispensation
Tribunal grants dispensation for urgent roof repairs in Newhaven, East Sussex
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to proceed with urgent roof repairs without full consultation because it was deemed necessary to avoid further water damage to flats. This decision is in line with Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, which allows for dispensation from consultation requirements if reasonable.
Tribunal Rules Tenants Liable for Service Charges But Not Administration Fee
Local Authority Can Recover Costs Under Building Safety Act
Tribunal Sets Market Rent After Considering Property Condition
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new market rent for a flat in London, considering issues of disrepair and comparable rental values. The landlord proposed an increase to £1950 per month, while the tenant argued for a lower rate due to property defects. The tribunal set the rent at £1950 pcm from 21 March 2026.
Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Due to Property Disrepair
A tenant's case against an increase in rent due to disrepair was successful. The tribunal adjusted the market rent from £1850 pcm to £1526.25 pcm, considering the state of repair and responsibilities under relevant laws.
First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Dagenham Property
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal assessed the market rent for a property located at the address in Dagenham. Both the tenant and the landlord provided evidence about the condition of the property and comparable rents in the area. The tribunal determined that the new rent should be £2200 per month, effective from June 12th, 2026.
Tribunal allows £3,753.40 service charge claim for flat in Medway
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal ruled on whether a tenant must pay service charges and legal fees associated with repairing communal areas of their building. The judge decided that while the tenant is responsible for a person costs under their lease agreement, they are not liable for unreasonable or excessive administration charges.
First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £850 PCM
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the market rent for a property in Leeds, setting it at £850 pcm after considering comparable properties and a person valuation. The tenant argued that the proposed rent was too high due to the property's condition compared to higher-priced listings.
