VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Determination for Protected Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a protected tenant's property, taking into account the state of repair and local market conditions. The fair rent was set at £141.00 per week, including £3.42 for services.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by considering the state of repair and local market conditions, among other factors, as per the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair rent determinationprotected tenancyrent act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 s.70Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 s.11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 What the law says

Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 s.11

This section of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 imposes repairing obligations on landlords for short leases. It requires the landlord to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling house in repair, along with installations for water, gas, electricity, sanitation, and heating. Additionally, if the dwelling house is part of a larger building, the landlord must also maintain parts of the building and installations that serve the dwelling house, provided they own or control these elements.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a protected tenant's property, considering various factors including the state of repair and local market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a protected tenant's property, considering various factors including the state of repair and local market conditions, resulting in a fair rent of £141.00 per week including £3.42 for services.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/F77/2023/0052

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Handsworth Wood, Birmingham, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord [NAME]

Tenant

[RESPONDENT]

1. The fair rent is £141.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 15 May 2024

3. The amount for services is £3.42 Per Week

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is N/A Per N/A

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 at £141.00 per week including £3.42 per week for services prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 15 May 2024

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 383.0

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 305.5

X 383.0 Minus Y 305.5 = (A) 77.5 (A) 77.5 Divided by Y 305.5 = (B) 0.25368

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) N/A

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.30368

Last registered rent* £108.00 Multiplied by (C) = £140.79 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £141.00

Variable service charge No If YES add amount for services N/A

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £141.00 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference : BIR/OOCN/F77/2023/0052

Property

: [ADDRESS], Handsworth Wood, Birmingham, [POSTCODE]

Applicant

: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : Appeal against the Rent Officer's Decision of Fair Rent under

the s.70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal Members : [NAME]. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) [NAME] and Venue of : Not Applicable, paper determination Hearing

Date of Decision : 15 May 2024

____________________________________________________________

DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

1 The Fair Rent is determined at £141.00 (One Hundred and Forty One Pounds) per week from 15 May 2024.

REASONS

Introduction

2 Ms [RESPONDENT] holds a protected tenancy of [ADDRESS], Handsworth Wood, Birmingham, [POSTCODE]. The fair rent had previously been registered at £108.00 per week on 8 July 2021 including £3.28 for services. On 24 August 2023 the landlord applied for a rent of £108.97 per week including £3.42 per week for services and on 20 October 2023 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £117.50 per week including £3.42 for services to take effect on 20 October 2023.

3 The tenant appealed against the Decision by letter dated 28 October 2023 and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal for Determination. The Tribunal reached its decision on 15 May 2024 and the Decision papers were sent to the parties. On 10 June 2024 the Tribunal received a letter from the tenant asking for Reasons for the Decision which are the subject of this document.

The Law

4 Ms [RESPONDENT] is a protected tenant which is acknowledged by the landlord. The tenancy agreement was not submitted with the application.

5 The landlord is assumed to be responsible for repairing the structure and exterior and the tenant for internal decorations in accordance with s.11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

6 Accordingly, the rent falls to be determined in accordance with s.70 of the Rent Act 1977.

7 S.70(1) of the Rent Act states that in determining a fair rent, regard has to be had to all the circumstances of the tenancy (other than personal circumstances) including the age, character, locality and state of repair of the house, whether the property is let furnished and whether a premium had been paid or would be required to renew, continue or assign the tenancy.

8 s.70(2) adds a further qualification that it is assumed the number of parties seeking to become tenants of similar houses in the locality on the terms of the tenancy (other than the rent) would not be substantially greater than the number of houses available to let on such terms. This is usually referred to as 'scarcity' and the Court of Appeal held in [COMPANY]. v Chairman of the Greater Manchester Rent Assessment Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 that under normal circumstances the fair rent would be the market rent discounted for scarcity. [ADDRESS] also held that assured tenancy rents could be considered comparable to market rents.

9 s.70(3) requires the valuation to disregard any disrepair due to a tenant's failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy and any improvements carried out by either the tenant or their predecessor in title.

Facts Found

10 The Tribunal did not inspect the property but relied on the Rent Register which described it as a modern terraced house with garage, built around 1979. It is part of a development of

3

similar houses near [ADDRESS] about two miles to the north west of Birmingham city centre.

11 The house is of three storey brick and tile construction with a garage on the ground floor.

12 It was assumed the tenant had not carried out any value affecting improvements that would have to be disregarded for the purposes of rent assessment under the Rent Act 1977.

Submissions

13 Ms [RESPONDENT]' letter of 28 October 2023 said she was dissatisfied with the standard of repair carried out by the landlord. Fences had blown down in December 2022 and had still not been repaired by the following October. Ms [RESPONDENT] had lived at the property for 30 years and noticed that the services provided by the landlord had been reduced over time.

14 The landlord did not send any submissions.

15 Neither party requested a Hearing.

Decision

16 The case was determined on paper based on the information provided and the Tribunal's general, but not specific, knowledge of rents across the West Midlands.

17 To assess the Fair Rent, the Tribunal needed to assess the rental value of the house in good condition as a starting point, assuming it had been well maintained and modernised with central heating, reasonable kitchen units and a bathroom suite in fair condition, fully equipped with carpets and curtains and ready to let in the open market. The Tribunal considered the location and market and found the full rental value in good condition to have been £200.00 per week.

16 The tenant was liable for internal decorations for which we deducted £10.00 per week. The landlord had not provided carpets or curtains for which we also deducted £10.00 per week or provided white goods for which we deducted a further £5.00 per week. The reduction for lack of amenity was therefore £25.00 per week.

17 The Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in s.70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 and found that the number of potential tenants looking for accommodation of this type in the area would have been substantially greater than the number of units available to let. We found the excess demand represented 15% of the market rent after allowing for lack of amenity, (i.e. £26.25) and deducted this from the full market rent to arrive at the statutory basis for a 'fair rent'.

18 £200.00 full market value less £25.00 for lack of amenity and £26.25 per week for scarcity left a net rent of £148.75 per week.

19 The Maximum Fair Rent Order limited the amount that could be charged by increasing the previously registered rent by inflation, measured by increases in the retail price index since the last registration and adding 5%, which limited the maximum new Fair Rent to £141.00 per week.

20 There was a service charge of £3.42 per week included in the rent for the landlord's costs of grounds maintenance, gardening, a 'mobile caretaker' and 'ranger' which is to be noted on the Rent Register.

4

21 Accordingly, the Tribunal determined the Fair Rent at £141.00 per week including £3.42 per week for services with effect from the date of its decision, 15 May 2024.

[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS Chairman

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The fair rent is determined by the state of repair and local market conditions.
  • The fair rent is subject to statutory caps as per the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent is determined using the formula prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent is set by the Tribunal under the Retail Price Index and relevant legislation.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the fair rent for a protected tenant's property at £141.00 per week, including £3.42 for services.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant with a protected tenancy and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the state of repair and local market conditions, among other factors.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the state of repair and local market conditions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the state of repair and local market conditions when determining their fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the state of repair and local market conditions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to higher courts.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.