VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a tenant based on the property's condition and layout, setting a new rent of £1,280 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and layout.

Topics

rent adjustmentproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section allows landlords to propose an increase in rent for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. The notice must be in a prescribed form and specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy. The new period must begin at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can only occur after a certain period, which varies depending on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section permits a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, considering various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to the Act.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent based on the property's condition and layout.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,280 per month for a property, adjusting the proposed rent based on the property's condition and layout.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AF/MNR/2024/0640

Property : 72 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] c/o [RESPONDENT] of Tenants Objection : 28 August 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Reasons : 24 January 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,280 per calendar month with effect from 1 September 2024. ___________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On the 1 August 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,450 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,250 per month to take effect from 1 September 2024. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of the revised tenancy agreement which commenced on the 1 March 2019 for a period of 12 months. The tenants have lived at the property since 2015.

2. Under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenants referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. This Notice was undated and was received by the Tribunal on the 28 August 2024.

Inspection and Hearing

3. A hearing to hear the parties representations was held at 10 00am on the 24 January 2025. The Tenants both attended in person. The Landlord was not present.

4. Following the hearing, the Tribunal arrived at the property on the 24 January 2015 at around 13. 10 in the presence of the Tenants.

Evidence

5. Directions were prepared by the Tribunal on the 24 October 2024. The Landlord and the Tenant provided the Tribunal with completed Reply Forms and comprehensive submissions which included photographs and details of comparable evidence from the Landlord. The crucial question for the Tribunal to determine: is this a one or two bedroom flat? This matter has a significant impact on rental value. Originally, the property was a one bedroom flat and the inspection revealed that in subsequent years a studwork partition has been erected in the living room to form a second bedroom. The layout of the flat is now compromised. The living room and the second bedroom are rather small which restricts furniture and wardrobe space.

The Law 6. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “[NAME]”) and any

3 increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, partial exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration and rainwater fittings.

Determination and Valuation

7. Having consideration of the comparable evidence provided by the Landlord, and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Anerley area. The Tribunal has considered the comparable evidence of 5 properties provided by the Landlord which ranged between £1650-£1750. It is the opinion of the Tribunal each of these properties are larger and superior two bedroom flats. We consider that the open market rent for the property if it benefitted from a more conventional layout and were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £1,600 per month.

7. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: the damp and mould to the flat and utility room, (former balcony) cracking to the wall plaster in the kitchen and bathroom, blown seals to the double glazing units in utility room, evidence of rodent infestation, a black plastic bag taped to the kitchen ceiling which covers a large hole with crumbling plaster, general refurbishment and, importantly, the poor internal configuration which equates to approximately 20% (£320)

Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,280 per calendar month.

9. The Tenants made an application to the Tribunal under s14(7). This provision allows the Tribunal to defer the date of increase to the date of determination if it appeared to the Tribunal that it would cause undue hardship to the tenant. The Tribunal has considered this request and on the balance of the evidence provided and the decision the Tribunal concludes that there is insufficient substantiation to show such undue hardship.

10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,280 per month to take effect on the 1 September 2024. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

4

Chairman: [NAME]: 24 January 2025

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. /LON/00f/MNR/2024/0640

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 72 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o J [RESPONDENT] 16F [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1280

Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 September 2024

*3. The amount included for services is

not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date original assured tenancy commenced 24/04/2015

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Statutory Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A purpose built second floor three room flat (formerly one bedroom) forming part of a three storey block.

[NAME] of Decision 24 January 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property is not in good condition.
  • The property's condition significantly affects its market value.
  • The rent should be adjusted for specific conditions of the property.
  • The property is in disrepair.
  • The rent reflects the open market value adjusted for the property's deficiencies.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,280 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant objected to the proposed rent increase, and the landlord proposed a higher rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the proposed rent based on the property's condition and layout.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the impact of the property's condition and layout on the market rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially for the tenant, as the rent was adjusted downward.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to challenge a proposed rent increase based on the property's condition and layout.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and details of comparable evidence from the landlord were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.