First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent for a property based on its condition, taking into account the state of repair and any necessary deductions. This decision reflects the tenant's right to a fair rent under the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the condition of the property, including any improvements or deteriorations.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the rent to reflect the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property based on its condition, adjusting the market rent to reflect dilapidation and obsolescence. The decision was made under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00FY/MNR/2024/0009
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 18 Field Maple Dr, Nottingham, [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] Mrs [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 9 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT] and [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: 783.75 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 January 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable Nil Per Month
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 September 2022
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Kitchen white goods except fridge and ground floor coverings
8. Description of premises An End-terraced two storey house with garage and garden situated in an established residential area. The accommodation comprises: Kitchen, lounge/diner, two bedrooms and bathroom/WC.
[NAME] of Decision 10 June 2024
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : BIR/00FY/MNR/2024/0009 Property : 18 Field Maple Dr, Nottingham, [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : None Respondent : [redacted] : [NAME] of application : 21 February 2024 Type of application : Determination of the market rent under s.14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members :
Mr [NAME] B [NAME] Valuer 0079475
Mrs [NAME] : Remote Date of decision : 10 June 2024
DECISION
The Tribunal determines the rent payable from 15 January 2024 is £783.75 per month.
Background 1 The Tenant made an application to Tribunal on 15 January 2024 seeking a determination of the rent under s.14 of the Housing Act. The rent passing at the date of the application was £750 month. 2 The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy which commenced on 15 September 2022. 3 Directions were issued to both parties following receipt of the application. 4 The Tribunal informed the parties of their rights to request an oral hearing. 5 An oral hearing was not held to discuss the application and written submissions on this matter. No hearing was requested by either party. 6 An inspection of the property was carried out after a request from the Tenant. 7 Prior to the determination, the parties were invited to submit relevant information on market rents in the area for similar properties. They were also invited to offer any details of dilapidation, repairs or improvements made to the property by either the Landlord or Tenant. 8 The parties were invited to provide a full description of the property on a reply form provided to them by the Tribunal. The Tenant provided a detailed description of the property. Property Description 9 The property is an end of terrace house The accommodation comprises: Ground floor: Lounge, Kitchen with pantry understairs First floor: Two bedroom, bathroom/wc Outside: Attached garage and front/rear garden Reported defects and obsolescence 10 The Tenant reported a series of specific and material defects to the property in their submissions. 11 The condition of the property is a material consideration when carrying out a fair rent determination. The Tribunal has also had regard for any dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
Market rental evidence 12 Both parties provided no details of comparable market rents of similar property in the locality. The Tribunal has had regard for any relevant information submitted and their own knowledge and experience of rental levels in and around the locality of the property. . Inspection
15. The Tribunal inspected the property in conjunction with the tenant applicants. The inspection revealed extensive damp staining to the ceiling of the rear bedroom with visible mould growth to surfaces. The front door lock mechanism was defective.
16. The Tribunal are told the Tenant has undertaken minor improvements to the bathroom wall units.
17. It was confirmed that the property is let unfurnished, with all carpets, and furniture being provided by the Tenant. The law 18. The Tribunal must first determine that the Tenant's notice under s.13(4) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.
19. The Housing Act 1988 s.14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
20. In so doing the Tribunal is required by s.14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant Tenant's improvements as defined in s.14(2) of that Act.
21. A copy of the relevant legislation is at Appendix A. Valuation
22. The Tribunal has had regard to any relevant rental evidence supplied by the parties, together with the Tribunal's own knowledge and experience of rental levels in and around the locality of the property. On this basis, it was their opinion that if this end of terrace house were in the same condition and managed to the same standard as those available to let on the open market the rental value would be £950 per month.
23. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
24. The property exhibits some dilapidation and disrepair which is material to the determined rent. It is acknowledged all soft furnishings, white goods and furniture are provided by the Tenant. 23 Table 1 below provides details of the market rent calculation:
24 After careful consideration, the Tribunal determined that a deduction from market rent of 17.5 % was appropriate and reasonable to reflect the dilapidation and obsolescence of the property.
Decision 25. The Tribunal first determined that the rent Notice under s.14 satisfied the requirements of that section and was served in time.
26. In coming to its decision to the rent the Tribunal applied the relevant law appended at Appendix A.
27. The decision of this Tribunal has regard for the evidence provided either in the written submissions of the parties or that gathered at any inspection of the premises.
28. After careful consideration the Tribunal determine that a rent of £783.75 per month is appropriate for this dwelling in present condition.
29. This rent will take effect from date 15 January 2024.
Name: [NAME] of reasons: 17 June 2024
5 Appendix A
Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent, by rent assessment committee. (1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: - (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In deciding under this section, there shall be disregarded: - (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement: - (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely: - (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, always during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and
(c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4) In this section 'rent' does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law. If a party wishes to appeal this Decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28-days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the Decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the Decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (ie, give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Flat Above Noisy Pub
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Case: Property Condition and Financial Hardship Considered
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition is poor.
- Rent adjustments should consider the tenant's ability to pay.
- Fair rent adjustments take into account market comparables.
- Improvements made by the tenant affect the rent adjustment.
- Rent adjustments are based on the open market value of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the rent to reflect the condition of the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent downwards due to the poor condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, Section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the need for a fair rent adjustment.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be entitled to a rent adjustment if the property is in poor condition.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable market rents were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
