VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, a tenant challenged a proposed rent increase because the property was in poor condition. The First-tier Tribunal inspected the property and found it to be in disrepair. As a result, the Tribunal adjusted the rent to £195.00 per week, effective from 24 October 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the condition of the property and its amenities.

Topics

rent adjustmentdisrepair

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the condition of the property and its amenities.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to disrepair and lack of amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted a proposed rent increase due to significant disrepair and lack of amenities in the property. The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £195.00 per week, effective from 24 October 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AH/MNR/2023/0432

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Ground floor flat, 154 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Trustee of Estate of Late Reginald Hall National W Address c/o [NAME], [ADDRESS], Cardiff, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 195.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 October 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 19 June 1995

6. Length of the term or rental period weekly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises Ground floor converted flat in 2 storey building having 2 rooms kitchen/dining room, shower room/wc

[NAME] 17 May 2023

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AH/MNR/2023/0432

Property : Ground floor flat, 154 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : Trustee of Estate of Late Reginald Hall National W

Date of Objection : 22 September 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME]

Mrs [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 17 May 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £195.00 per week with effect from 24 October 2023. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 15 September 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 315.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 100.00 per week to take effect from 24 October 2023.

2. On 20 September 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 22 September 2023

Inspection 3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 17 May 2023 . The tribunal noted serious disrepair in various areas including damp affected plaster and missing skirting boards following poor quality repairs. Windows are poorly fitted and in poor repair. The tenant fitted the kitchen and central heating. No carpets, curtains or white goods are provided.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. The Landlords submission included a link to Rightmove listing various properties in the SW16 post code which covers a wide area. The tribunal also relied on its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £325.00 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Disrepair and lack of amenities listed above.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

pw AST Market rent 325.00 £ less condition/terms 40.0% 130.00 -£ 195.00 £

3 Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £195.00 per week.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £195.00 to take effect on 24 October 2023 This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: [NAME]: 17 May 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the open market value of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to have a new rent assessed by the First-tier Tribunal if they believe it exceeds the open market value.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent increase to £195.00 per week due to the property's disrepair.

Who was involved?

The tenant challenged the landlord's proposed rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the rent after inspecting the property and finding it to be in disrepair.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the lack of amenities.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to challenge a proposed rent increase if the property is in poor condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence of the property's condition and the inspection report mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.