First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal increased the rent of an assured shorthold tenancy to £2,200 per month, effective from 9 August 2024, based on market conditions and comparable evidence.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment under Section 22 of the Housing Act 1988 if the current rent does not reflect the open market value.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 22 allows a tenant of an assured shorthold tenancy to apply to an appropriate tribunal for a determination of rent if the current rent does not reflect the open market value. The tribunal will consider whether there are enough similar properties in the area and whether the current rent is significantly higher than what could reasonably be obtained in the market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal increased the rent of an assured shorthold tenancy based on market conditions and comparable evidence.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2,200 per month for an assured shorthold tenancy, effective from 9 August 2024, after considering comparable evidence and market conditions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MDR/2024/0601
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Shorthold Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 22
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 4th Floor, [ADDRESS], London, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 2,200 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 9 August 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 February 2024
6. Length of the term or rental period One year to 27 February 2025
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord responsible for structural repair and exterior repair and repair of utilities
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Bed, small fridge, washing machine, microwave and cupboard.
9. Description of premises Victorian stone clad and brick, end of terrace, 4 storey with sash windows.
Chairman J. Pittaway Date of Decision 6 May 2025
(c)
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AW/MDR/2024/0601
HMCTS code :
P: PAPERREMOTE Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Miss [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a market rent under Section 22 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 6 May 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,200 per calendar month with effect from 9 August 2024. ____________________________________
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On 29 February 2024 the Tenant entered into a tenacy agreement in respect of the property with the Landlord for a term of one year from 29 February 2024 at a rent of £1,700 per month.
2. On 9 August 2024 the Tribunal received an application from the Tenant to determine the market rent payable under the Tenancy under section 22(1) of the Housing Act 1988.
(c)
2
Inspection
3. The Directions stated that the tribunal might not inspect the interior of the property, and that if an inspection was requested it would be of the exterior of the property only. The parties were asked to provide a description of the property, and advised that the Tribunal might use [ADDRESS] to gather some information about the property.
4. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties, and the use of [ADDRESS].
5. The Property is a studio flat on the fourth floor of an end of terrace four storey property. From the [ADDRESS] the windows appear tobe be sash windows. The Tenant in her application sated that the landlord provided a bed and cupboard, and white goods.
Evidence
6. No rental evidence was provided by the Tenant. The Landlord provided some rental evidence of studio flats in the immediate vicinity (Marylebone and Paddington), which was of a limited nature and use.
Determination and Valuation
7. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the Landlord and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in in the condition and with the amenties that the market would expect would be in the region of £2,400 per calendar month.
8. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to allow for the differences between the condition of the property and that considered usual for such a letting in today’s market and determine in its expert opinion a rent of £2,200 would appear reasonably to reflect the condition of the property when let.
9. As the level of rent determined by the Tribunal is more than that fixed by the Landord the Tribunal wrote to the Tenant on 4 December 2024, copied to the Landlord, advising her that it was condsidering a rent that was substantially higher than the rent rent fixed by the Landlord. It postponed its decision and asked the Tenant whether she wished to make further representations or withdraw her application. The Tribunal received no response from the Tenant to its letter. On 13 March 2025 it advised the parties that as the Tenant had not withdrawn her application it would proceed to determine the application.
(c)
3 Decision 10 The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £2,200 per calendar month.
11. By section 22(4)(a) Housing Act 1988 the determination under section 22 shall have effect from such date as the Tribunal may direct, being not earlier than the date of the application.
12. The application was made on 9 August 2024 and the Tribunal determines that the rent takes effect from that date.
Chairman: J. Pittaway
Date: 6 May 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Rent Reduced Due to Cladding Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1,800 After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Unfurnished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Deci…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent must reflect the open market value of the property.
- The property must be in good tenantable condition.
- Rent adjustments can consider the condition and furnishings of the property.
- Tenants are entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable properties.
- Disrepair issues in the property can lead to a rent reduction.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to increase the rent of an assured shorthold tenancy to £2,200 per month.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and market conditions, adjusting the rent to reflect the open market value.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 22 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rent with similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a rent adjustment if the current rent does not reflect the open market value.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence of rents for similar properties in the area mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
