VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Poorly Maintained Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal reviewed a landlord's attempt to increase rent for a poorly maintained property and decided on a fairer rent of £370.00 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair and reasonable rent for a property that is fit for human habitation.

Topics

rent increaseproperty conditionhuman habitation

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 s.14Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair and reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application cannot be made if the rent is already determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal reviewed the rent increase for a poorly maintained property and adjusted the rent to a more reasonable level.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal reviewed a notice of rent increase for a poorly maintained property and set a new rent of £370.00 per month, considering the property's condition and the tenant's obligations.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HA/MNR/2021/0085

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Amended 21st December 2021 under Rule 53 The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 SI No. 1169

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Mill Cottage, [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 370.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 August 2021

3. The amount included for services and listed below at box 8 is: £100.00 Per Calendar Month

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 June 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & [APPELLANT] 1985

7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT], 3 x bookcases, double mattress and frame, washing machine, fridge/freezer, range cooker and microwave.

8. Description of premises Poorly converted property providing 1 living room/kitchen and downstairs (through hatch in floor) a poor bathroom with an 'oriental strand board' box and bucket for foul waste.

Included in the rent is the cost of Council tax, electricity, water and wifi.

MR22 [NAME] of Decision 21 December 2021

1

Case Reference

: CHI/00HA/MNR/2021/0085

Property : Mill Cottage, [NAME], Timsbury, Bath [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 27th July 2021

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]

: 21st December 2021

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

Amended Decision and Reasons under Rule 53 The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2014 SI No. 1169

This decision replaces the Tribunal's Decision Notice and Reasons Form Decision dated 29th September 2021

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 21st December 2021 in the sum of £370.00 per calendar month including services as described below.

2. By an application dated 27th July 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. This decision replaces the Tribunal's Decision Notice and Reasons For Decision dated 29th September 2021.

4. Following applications for permission to appeal by both the [APPELLANT] and [RESPONDENT] the Tribunal determined to review it decision dated 29th September 2021 and this document comprises the amended decision.

5. The full determination in respect of the applications for permission to appeal are attached at Appendix 1 to this document.

6. In summary the position following the two applications for permission to appeal is:

a) The [RESPONDENT] says he did not receive any notification of the [APPELLANT]'s application to the Tribunal under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 and as a consequence was unable to respond to the application.

b) The [APPELLANT] says the Tribunal misunderstood the responsibility for paying for the liquid gas.

c) The Tribunal determined upon receiving the applications to appeal that it would review its decision in its entirety and issued Directions (dated 2nd December 2021) asking the parties to Complete the Reply Form and make submissions.

d) The Tribunal then re-considered the whole application on 21st December 2021.

7. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 29th June 2021 proposed a rent of £708.85 pcm. with effect from 1st August 2021, in place of the current rent of £477.00 pcm.

8. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and commenced on 1st June 2020. The tenancy is subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] 1985.

Property and Inspection 9. Following the Directions dated 2nd December 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

3

10. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and found as follows:

11. The property is located on a farm in rural location to the south west of Bath.

12. The property comprises a detached cottage on [NAME]. Part double glazed with liquid gas central heating and laminate floors.

13. The accommodation comprises: First Floor: One room with kitchen units, sink and range cooker. Mezzanine sleeping spaces (with ladder access). Ground Floor (accessed via a hatch in the floor of the First Floor) and has a sink, a bathtub and a compost toilet. Outside garden and off street parking.

14. Fixtures and Fittings: Table, 3 x bookcases, double mattress and frame, washing machine, fridge/freezer, range cooker, microwave and laminate floor are included in the Tenancy.

15. The Tribunal understands that all mains services, except gas and foul water drainage are connected.

16. Included in the rent are the costs of: electricity, wifi, water and council tax.

Hearing 17. A hearing was not requested.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 18. Tribunal Directions dated 2nd December 2021.

19. For the avoidance of any doubt the Tribunal relied on the original Application Form, Notice of Increase, Agreement and the submissions of the parties following the Directions dated 2nd December 2021.

20. [RESPONDENT]: Reply Form.

21. [APPELLANT]: Application and Reply Form, Notice of Increase, Tenancy agreement,

[RESPONDENT]'s Representations (summarised): 22. Improvements undertaken: a) 2020: Central heating b) 2020: New roof and insulation c) 2020: Compost toilet

23. The rent includes: Electricity, council tax, water rates and fibre optic wi-fi.

24. The property was never intended to be let it comprised the [RESPONDENT]'s private dwelling.

25. There are many defects present and the building needs a total refit which cannot happen whilst the property is occupied.

4

26. Bathroom includes bathtub with shower, hand wash basin, compost toilet (rebuilt to [APPELLANT]'s specification) and storage room.

27. Private access and parking. Reasonable bus service to Bristol, Bath and Midsomer Norton. [NAME], [NAME] and three schools nearby.

28. There are no comparable properties nearby apart from the rooms in [NAME]. All tenants pay the same rent as Mr [NAME] and agree to 4 hours farm work per week as part of the rent. Mr [NAME] although originally agreeing to this condition has now refused to undertake the 4 hours farm work.

29. Examples: 1 bed flat near Bath £1,100.00 pcm plus bills (no Children). 1 Bed flat (on main road) £850.00 pcm plus bills (no children).

30. Rent for this cottage should be the same as other tenants on the farm pay for a separate dwelling: £500.00 to £550.00 pcm plus 4 hours per week farm work.

31. Rents for a single room in shared Farmhouse are £450.00 pcm plus 4 hours per week farm work.

32. There are almost no small rental properties available and most offered say no children, no pets or universal credit.

[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised): 33. The [APPELLANT] says in the Reply Form:

34. The [APPELLANT] confirmed the repairs undertaken by the [RESPONDENT].

35. The services comprise: water, wi-fi, electricity and council tax are included in the rent.

36. Repair and Condition:

a) The building is in poor condition, holes in stonework filled with broken brick, door to bathroom ill fitting, ply board adjacent to the door is rotten and covered in roof tiles. b) To rear of the cottage is a shed which is often filled with pigeons and their waste, the wall adjoining is in poor repair. c) The kitchen is poorly constructed with second hand parts. the bath is a re- purposed pig trough. The toilet is an oriental strand box with bucket provided by the [APPELLANT]. d) The roof is incomplete at the gable ends allowing squirrels access to nest in the insulation.

37. There is a bus stop in Timsbury with buses to Bath.

38. The [APPELLANT] does not consider the property is fit for human habitation.

39. There is no Electrical Safety Certificate or Energy Performance Certificate.

5

40. The farm also runs a camp site, weddings and festivals from late spring to end August which causes a lot of noise and people in the vicinity of the cottage.

41. The cottage is freezing in winter and cools down quickly. In winter a bottle of gas (£70.00) lasts 7 to 10 days.

42. There is an unresolved vermin problem.

43. The [APPELLANT] does not consider a 67.00% increase in rent to be fair and realistic.

44. The [APPELLANT] did not receive the government guide on 'How to rent'.

45. There is a rotten beam held up by a piece of vertical timber near the cooker.

46. The use of the workshop below the first floor results in noise and a general lack of privacy.

47. The [APPELLANT] is inclined to value the services at £70.00 to £100.00.

48. A series of photographs provided by the [APPELLANT] show the accommodation including the hatch access to the Ground Floor, the kitchen and bathroom facilities.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 49. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or [RESPONDENT], nor any dispute between them, are not relevant to this issue.

50. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice of rent increase was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

51. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property does not have a certificate rating the property's energy performance. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is Rating E.

52. Based on the knowledge of its members, the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. The subject property appears to the Tribunal to be in condition that would not be legal to offer or appeal to a prospective [APPELLANT] in the open market. Further the Tribunal concurs with the parties view that the property is not fit for human habitation.

53. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the [RESPONDENT] could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar but modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings,

6

curtains, cooker and an EPC Rating above F would be £550.00 pcm (Assuming the directed labour element is not included).

54. As a matter of judgement, in the light of the lack of comparable evidence, the Tribunal makes the following deductions:

a) Poor repair £30.00 pcm. b) Lack of modernisation, in particular lack of mains drainage, adequate kitchen and bathroom facilities £100.00 pcm. c) Poor internal layout and design, in particular the 'hatch access' to the ground floor £100.00 pcm. d) Lack of evidence of Energy Performance Certificate, Electrical and Gas Safety certification £50.00 pcm.

A total deduction of £280.00 pcm.

55. This leaves a 'rental element' of £270.00. The Tribunal considers that it is appropriate to add to this figure sum of £100.00 pcm to reflect the fact that, water, electricity, council tax and wifi are included.

56. Accordingly the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £370.00 pcm.

57. The rent will take effect from 1st August 2021 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 58. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

59. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

7

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

8

Appendix 1

Case Reference : CHI/00HA/MNR/2021/0085

Property : Mill Cottage, [NAME],

Timsbury, Bath, [POSTCODE]

Applicants : [redacted]

[NAME] ([RESPONDENT])

Type of Application : Applications by both parties for permission to Appeal a decision of the First-tier Tribunal

Tribunal Members : [NAME] (Chairman) [NAME] [NAME] of Decision : 2nd December 2021

_________________________________________________

DECISION ON A REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL __________________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

9

DECISION

1. The Tribunal has considered the request by both the [RESPONDENT] and [APPELLANT] (separately) for permission to appeal dated 9th and 15th November 2021 respectively and determines that: (a) it will review its decision, and (b) the matter will be considered on the papers submitted in accordance with the Directions below.

2. In accordance with section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and Rule 21 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) ([NAME]) Rules 2010, the Applicant may make further application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]). Such application must be made in writing and received by the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) no later than 14 days after the date on which the First-tier Tribunal sent notice of this refusal to the party applying for permission to appeal.

REASONS FOR DECISION

3. The Tribunal received on 9th November from the [RESPONDENT] and on 15th November 2021 a request from the [APPELLANT] for permission to appeal its decision issued on 29th September 2021. In particular the [RESPONDENT] says that:

4. He did not receive notification of the [APPELLANT]'s original application and only became aware of it on receiving the Tribunal's decision.

5. For personal reasons the [APPELLANT] was allowed into Mill Cottage on a temporary basis (from other accommodation at [NAME]).

6. As part of his obligations the [APPELLANT] (in return for the accommodation) was to undertake 4 hours per week of [NAME]. The [APPELLANT] objected to this and the [RESPONDENT] served notice to increase the rent to take account of this fact.

7. The [RESPONDENT] acknowledges that the cottage requires renovation. In particular the [APPELLANT] says that:

8. The Tribunal has misunderstood the responsibility for paying for the supply of liquid gas to the property.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is adjusted based on the property's actual condition and amenities.
  • The rent reflects the condition and amenities provided by the tenant.
  • The term "fair rent" is emphasized in the decision.
  • Reasonable rent is considered alongside the condition and amenities of the property.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent is based solely on the condition and amenities without additional adjustments.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a monthly rent of £370.00 for an assured periodic tenancy in Timsbury, Bath.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the proposed rent increase from £477.00 to £708.85 per month for a poorly maintained property in Timsbury.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set a lower rent of £370.00 per month, considering the poor condition of the property and the services included in the rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, Section 14 was applied to determine the reasonable rent for the assured tenancy.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the services included in the rent, which influenced the decision on the reasonable rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set lower than the proposed increase.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might be able to challenge a proposed rent increase if the property is in poor condition and the services are included in the rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property, the services included in the rent, and the proposed rent increase were the key pieces of evidence considered by the court.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.