VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Confirms Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal confirmed the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. This means the tenant will continue to pay the agreed rent of £720 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent confirmed under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The application can be made if the rent has not been previously determined under this section and if less than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal confirmed the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal confirmed the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 04 May 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CX/MNR/2024/0077

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] 1st [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 720.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 04 May 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 04 August 2019 Statutory Periodic Tenancy

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 landlord and Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Mid terraced modern property comprising a living room, small galley kitchen, 3 bedrooms, a bathroom, garage and small gardens to front and rear.

[NAME] of Decision 11 June 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent confirmed under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a market rent that reflects the open market value of the property, regardless of the social rent formula used by the landlord.
  • A tenant may have their rent adjusted if they can prove financial hardship and property defects.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It confirmed the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, confirming the rent as requested.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is confirmed according to the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.