VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property after considering the tenant's objections and applying the Rent Act 1977. The rent was capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent as determined by the Rent Act 1977, subject to statutory caps.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977capped rents

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property based on the Rent Act 1977 and capped it according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent for a property based on the Rent Act 1977 and capped it according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was made after considering the written objection provided by the tenant and the lack of rental comparables from the parties.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

1

Case Reference

: LON/00BK/F77/2025/0308

Property : [ADDRESS],[POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 25 September 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 1 December 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £1138.00 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from I December 2025, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal has considered the written objection provided by the Tenant. The tenant pointed out the description of the accommodations wrong as the flat only had one room on the ground floor and not two. However the tribunal cannot retrospectively change the rent registered last time and must apply the Fair Rent Order calculation to it.

4. There were no other written submissions from the parties.

Determination and Valuation

5. In the absence of rental comparables provided by the parties the tribunal has relied on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £2390.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. Tenant decorating liability b. No carpets curtains or white goods

6. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

7. The full valuation is shown below:

Fair rent PCM Market rent 2,390.00 £ less condition & terms 30% 717.00 -£ adjusted rent 1,673.00 £ less scarcity off adj rent 20% 334.60 -£ Fair rent 1,338.40 £

3 Decision

8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £1338.4 per calendar month. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £1138.00 per calendar month. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £1138.00 per calendar month is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.

9. The tribunal notes that the rent paid by the tenant may be a social rent which can only be increased by the rise in the Consumer Prices Index plus 1%. The jurisdiction of the tribunal is limited to finding a fair rent as set out in the Rent Act which is the maximum rent which can be charged and it has no power over the level of a social rent. If applicable it is the lower of the social rent and fair rent which is due from the tenant.

[NAME]: [NAME]: 1 December 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/F77/2025/0308

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS],[POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 1138.00 Per Cal Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 1 December 2025

3. The amount for services is 58.54 Per Cal month

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

Accommodation should read Basement 2 rooms, wc and ground floor 1 room. Kitchen , bathroom/wc

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ 1338.50 ............... per Calendar month ....... including £ 58.54 ............. per month ...................... for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ................... per .................... including £ ......................................... per ................................. for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 1 December 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 407.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 257.5

X 407.4 Minus Y 257.5 = (A) 149.9

(A) 149.9 Divided by Y 257.5 = (B) 0.58214

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.63214

Last registered rent* 697.00 Multiplied by (C) = 1137.60 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1138.00

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1138.00 Per Calendar month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal adjusted the market rent downwards because the property lacked carpets, curtains, or white goods.
  • An adjustment was made for scarcity in determining the fair rent.
  • The capped rent, calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, was the lower amount registered.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set a fair rent for the property at £1138.00 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The tenant objected to the determination of the fair rent, while the landlord sought to establish a new rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977 and capped the rent according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant argued that the description of the accommodation was incorrect, but the tribunal could not change the previously registered rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially for the tenant, as the rent was capped at a lower rate.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might benefit from having their rent capped at a fair rate.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The written objection provided by the tenant and the lack of rental comparables from the parties were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.