VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977. They considered the market rent and statutory caps to determine the fair rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal considering the market rent and statutory caps.

Topics

fair rentRent Act 1977tenancy valuation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 s.70Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the market rent and statutory caps. The decision was made by Judge J White on 21 October 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

FIRST – TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BN/F77/2021/0044 Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] Landlord : [COMPANY] : Type of [NAME] : Rent Act 1977 – Section 70 Tribunal Members : Judge J [NAME] S Wanderer

Venue: Northern Residential Property First-tier Tribunal, 1 floor, Piccadilly Exchange, 2Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester, [POSTCODE] Determination : 15 August 2022 Date of Reasons : 21 October 2022

DECISION ________________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2

Order

The Tribunal determines that the fair rent payable is £114.86. per week, inclusive of £19.36 for services per month with effect from 15 August 2022. Background 1. Since 10 May 2010, the Tenant holds under a weekly secure tenancy of 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the Property). The tenancy is governed by Part VI of the Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”). The last registered rent was £95 inclusive of £17.01 for services per month effective from 13 September 2019. In addition, there was £7.35 for fuel charges.

2. On 15 September 2021, the Landlord applied to the Rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £87.69 per week.

3. On 4 November 2021, the Rent Officer registered a rent of £97 per week (inclusive of services of £19.36), effective the same day. There is an additional fuel charge of £8.37 per week. We were not provided with a copy of the calculations, though were provided with a list of rent comparators for 1 bedroomed self-contained purpose built flats in the same postcode. The rents ranged from £114.23 to £173.08 per week.

4. On 24 November 2021, the Tenant objected to the rent as registered and requested the Rent Officer to refer the matter to the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (“the Tribunal”), and so the fair rent to be registered in respect of the Property fell to be determined by the Tribunal. Neither party requested an oral hearing.

The Inspection 5. On 15 August 2022 the Tribunal attempted to inspect the Property. We could not gain access.

6. The Property is a 1 bedroom ground floor flat. The property is situated within a purpose-built block three-storey block set back from a residential tree lined road with communal car parking.

3

The Law 7. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977 (“The Act”), section 70, has regard to all the circumstances, save for personal circumstances, including the age, location and state of repair of the property. Section 70 of the Act requires the tribunal to disregards the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. In this way a landlord does not benefit by way of increased rent from any tenant’s improvements and the tenant does not benefit from any defaults on his or her part that would otherwise have lowered the rental value of the property.

8. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property). A market rent is the rent of a similar property in a similar locality, age character and repair. Reasons 9. The Tenant had submitted that the maximum rent increase should be subject to the maximum RPI of 5%. On 17 November 2021 the RPI was 4.8% in November and 4.7% in October, therefore the maximum should be £91 per week, though the fair rent should be £89 as he has not had a rent increase of more than £4 per week and his previous rent was £82.56. The Landlord did not provide submissions.

10. The Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that was considered usual for such an open market letting. We used our knowledge and expertise of market rents. We took into account the popularity of the area and location on a tree lined residential street, with

4

parking, in a relatively modern purpose built flats. We determined that the open market rent in good condition was £140 per week. We were not provided with any evidence of the internal condition of the Property and deducted £14 lack of [NAME] goods carpets and curtains, as would be usual for this type of tenancy.

11. This provided for an open market rent as £126. Adding in variable service charges provides a rent of £145.36.

12. The Tribunal does not consider that in the present-day market, there is any substantial scarcity element in the larger locality and accordingly no further deduction is made for scarcity.

13. As this is a fair rent, then the rent must be capped as set out in the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. This must be calculated by the statutory formula below. This calculation is made on the date of the Tribunal determination and consequently is above the capped rent calculated by the Rent Officer. The capped rent using the formula below, including RPI figures set each month is £95.50 . Adding in the variable service charges provides a capped rent of £114.86.

14. As the capped rent is below the market rent of £145.36, these provisions apply. The fair rent, then is determined at £114.86. per week.

Signed: Judge J [NAME]: 21 October 2022

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE x 340

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE y 291

X 340 Minus y 291 = (A) 49.0000

5

(A) 49.0000 divided by y 291 = (B) 0.16838

First [NAME] for re-registration since 1 February 1999: YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.21838

Last registered rent* £77.99 Multiplied by (C) = £95.02

*(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50 pence = £ 95.50

Variable service charge: Yes £19.36

If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £114.86 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

6

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present [NAME] was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent [NAME] since that date).

(c) A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

(d) The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Committee's fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the [NAME] of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal considers the property's age and condition when determining a fair rent.
  • The scarcity of properties in the local market is taken into account for fair rent determination.
  • Market rent levels are used as a basis for calculating a fair rent.
  • Tenant improvements and disrepair adjustments are considered in the fair rent calculation.
  • The state of repair and any defects of the property are factored into the fair rent decision.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property was set at £114.86 per week, including services.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the market rent and statutory caps, ensuring the rent was fair and capped appropriately.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the market rent and the application of statutory caps.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that was lower than the proposed rent but higher than the previous rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined similarly, considering market conditions and statutory requirements.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included rent comparators and the condition of the property.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.