First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Purchase Price
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the purchase price for the freehold interest in a property in Tottenham, London. The price was set at £45,970.10 after considering a valuation report and a person legal provisions.
⚖️ Legal holding
The appropriate sum to be paid into Court for the transfer of the freehold interest is determined by the Tribunal.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the purchase price for the freehold interest in a property located in Tottenham, London.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the purchase price for the freehold interest in a property located in Tottenham, London, to be £45,970.10, following a valuation report and considering the relevant legal provisions under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/ooAP/OCE/2021/0079 Property : 63, [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicants : [redacted] (2) [NAME_1] (3) [NAME_1] : [NAME_2] Respondent : [redacted] : A determination of amount of the appropriate sum to be paid into Court under the section 27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 Tribunal Members :
Tribunal Judge S.J. Walker Tribunal Member [NAME_4]
Date and venue of Hearing : Decided on the Papers Date of Decision : 9 November 2021
DECISION
Decisions of the Tribunal
(1) That the purchase price for the freehold interest in 63, [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is determined to be £46,313 less £342.90 as directed making a total payable of £45,970.10.
(2) That the Applicant shall pay the purchase price into Court pursuant to section 27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
2
Reasons The application 1. The Applicants issued an application in the Edmonton County Court on 28 May 2019 for an order under section 26 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (“the Act”) and on 12 September 2019 District Judge Cohen made a vesting order under section 26(1) of the Act and ordered that the Applicants may make an application to the Tribunal for a determination under section 27(5) of the Act of the amount to be paid into Court for the transfer of the freehold of the property, the landlord being missing.
2. The Tribunal is therefore asked by the Applicants to determine the single issue of the price payable for the transfer of the freehold interest pursuant to section 21 of the Act.
3. Directions were issued on 7 May 2021. They directed that the application should be determined on the papers alone. The directions also required the Applicants to prepare a bundle of documents. In compliance with those directions the Applicants’ solicitors provided a detailed bundle of documents comprising 88 pages.
4. The Tribunal considered rules 3 and 31 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and was satisfied that it was appropriate to determine the application without a hearing. The Evidence 5. The bundle produced by the Applicants included; (a) a witness statement from [NAME_5]; (b) the judgment from the County Court; (c) the register of title of the freehold interest – title No. NGL289487; (d) the register of title of the leasehold interests EGL188564 and EGL198252; (d) a valuation report prepared by [NAME_6] MA MRICS; and (e) a draft transfer
6. The property is subject to two leases. The first is of the first floor flat and is for a term of 99 years from 24 June 1986. The second is of the ground floor flat and is for the same term. The ground rents were initially £75 per annum, they increased to £150 per annum on 23 June 2019 and will increase again on 23 June 2052 to £225 per annum.
7. The property is a period mid-terraced property of brick construction finished in pebble dash and painted. The roof is pitched with interlocking tiles. The
3 property has been converted to create two residential units over ground and first floors. The premises are accessed via a communal front door and the common area is in basic condition. The flats themselves are in average condition internally. The property’s condition is consistent with its age and type of construction.
The Determination 8. Utilising its expertise the Tribunal accepts the valuation provided in the report by [NAME_6]. It noted with respect to relativity that [NAME_6] had been unable to find real world comparable evidence for the value of the short term lease and had therefore turned to graphs of relativity. He had not made use of the graphs preferred in the recent Deritend case. However, the Tribunal found that the relativity he selected was appropriate with reference to the Savill’s and Gerald Eve 2015 graphs. On this basis it determines that the purchase price is £46,313.
9. From this sum the [ADDRESS] instructed that an amount of £3,042.90 be set off being costs determined payable by the Defendant.
10. The Tribunal approves the draft transfer as drawn save in one respect. It bears in mind the provision in paragraph 2(2)(b) of Schedule 7 of the Act which requires that the existing freeholder shall not be bound to enter into any conveyance for title beyond those where a disposition is expressed to be made with limited title guarantee. It follows that paragraph 9 of the draft transfer must be amended so as to indicate that the transferor transfers with limited title guarantee.
11. The relevant legal provisions are set out in the appendix below.
Name: Tribunal Judge S.J. Walker Date:
9 November 2021
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.
• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
4 • The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
• If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
• The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
Appendix of relevant legislation Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 section 26 Applications where relevant landlord cannot be found. (1) Where not less than two-thirds of the qualifying tenants of flats contained in any premises to which this Chapter applies desire to make a claim to exercise the right to collective enfranchisement in relation to those premises but— (a) (in a case to which section 9(1) applies) the person who owns the freehold of the premises cannot be found or his identity cannot be ascertained, or (b) (in a case to which section 9(2) or (2A) applies) each of the relevant landlords is someone who cannot be found or whose identity cannot be ascertained, the court may, on the application of the qualifying tenants in question, make a vesting order under this subsection— (i) with respect to any interests of that person (whether in those premises or in any other property) which are liable to acquisition on behalf of those tenants by virtue of section 1(1) or (2)(a) or section 2(1), or (ii) with respect to any interests of those landlords which are so liable to acquisition by virtue of any of those provisions, as the case may be. (2) Where in a case to which section 9(2) applies—
5 (a) not less than two-thirds of the qualifying tenants of flats contained in any premises to which this Chapter applies desire to make a claim to exercise the right to collective enfranchisement in relation to those premises, and (b) paragraph (b) of subsection (1) does not apply, but (c) a notice of that claim or (as the case may be) a copy of such a notice cannot be given in accordance with section 13 or Part II of Schedule 3 to any person to whom it would otherwise be required to be so given because he cannot be found or his identity cannot be ascertained, the court may, on the application of the qualifying tenants in question, make an order dispensing with the need to give such a notice or (as the case may be) a copy of such a notice to that person. (3) If in a case to which section 9(2) applies, that person is the person who owns the freehold of the premises, then on the application of those tenants, the court may, in connection with an order under subsection (2), make an order appointing any other relevant landlord to be the [NAME_7] in respect of the premises in place of that person; and if it does so references in this Chapter to the [NAME_7] shall apply accordingly. (3A) Where in a case to which section 9(2A) applies— (a) not less than two-thirds of the qualifying tenants of flats contained in any premises to which this Chapter applies desire to make a claim to exercise the right to collective enfranchisement in relation to those premises, and (b) paragraph (b) of subsection (1) does not apply, but (c) a copy of a notice of that claim cannot be given in accordance with Part II of Schedule 3 to any person to whom it would otherwise be required to be so given because he cannot be found or his identity cannot be ascertained, the court may, on the application of the qualifying tenants in question, make an order dispensing with the need to give a copy of such a notice to that person. (4) The court shall not make an order on any application under subsection (1) (2) or (3A)unless it is satisfied— (a) that on the date of the making of the application the premises to which the application relates were premises to which this Chapter applies; and
6 (b) that on that date the applicants would not have been precluded by any provision of this Chapter from giving a valid notice under section 13 with respect to those premises. (5) Before making any such order the court may require the applicants to take such further steps by way of advertisement or otherwise as the court thinks proper for the purpose of tracing the person or persons in question; and if, after an application is made for a vesting order under subsection (1) and before any interest is vested in pursuance of the application, the person or (as the case may be) any of the persons referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) of that subsection is traced, then no further proceedings shall be taken with a view to any interest being so vested, but (subject to subsection (6))— (a) the rights and obligations of all parties shall be determined as if the applicants had, at the date of the application, duly given notice under section 13 of their claim to exercise the right to collective enfranchisement in relation to the premises to which the application relates; and (b) the court may give such directions as the court thinks fit as to the steps to be taken for giving effect to those rights and obligations, including directions modifying or dispensing with any of the requirements of this Chapter or of regulations made under this Part. (6) An application for a vesting order under subsection (1) may be withdrawn at any time before execution of a conveyance under section 27(3) and, after it is withdrawn, subsection (5)(a) above shall not apply; but where any step is taken (whether by the applicants or otherwise) for the purpose of giving effect to subsection (5)(a) in the case of any application, the application shall not afterwards be withdrawn except— (a) with the consent of every person who is the owner of any interest the vesting of which is sought by the applicants, or (b) by leave of the court, and the court shall not give leave unless it appears to the court just to do so by reason of matters coming to the knowledge of the applicants in consequence of the tracing of any such person. (7) Where an order has been made under subsection (2) or (3A)dispensing with the need to give a notice under section 13, or a copy of such a notice, to a particular person with respect to any particular premises, then if— (a) a notice is subsequently given under that section with respect to those premises, and (b) in reliance on the order, the notice or a copy of the notice is not to be given to that person,
7 the notice must contain a statement of the effect of the order. (8) Where a notice under section 13 contains such a statement in accordance with subsection (7) above, then in determining for the purposes of any provision of this Chapter whether the requirements of section 13 or Part II of Schedule 3 have been complied with in relation to the notice, those requirements shall be deemed to have been complied with so far as relating to the giving of the notice or a copy of it to the person referred to in subsection (7) above. (9) Rules of court shall make provision— (a) for requiring notice of any application under subsection (3) to be served by the persons making the application on any person who the applicants know or have reason to believe is a relevant landlord; and (b) for enabling persons served with any such notice to be joined as parties to the proceedings. 27 Supplementary provisions relating to vesting orders under section 26(1). (1) A vesting order under section 26(1) is an order providing for the vesting of any such interests as are referred to in paragraph (i) or (ii) of that provision— (a) in such person or persons as may be appointed for the purpose by the applicants for the order, and (b) on such terms as may be determined by the appropriate tribunal to be appropriate with a view to the interests being vested in that person or those persons in like manner (so far as the circumstances permit) as if the applicants had, at the date of their application, given notice under section 13 of their claim to exercise the right to collective enfranchisement in relation to the premises with respect to which the order is made. (2) If the appropriate tribunal so determines in the case of a vesting order under section 26(1), the order shall have effect in relation to interests which are less extensive than those specified in the application on which the order was made. (3) Where any interests are to be vested in any person or persons by virtue of a vesting order under section 26(1), then on his or their paying into court the appropriate sum in respect of each of those interests there shall be executed by such person as the court may designate a conveyance which— (a) is in a form approved by the appropriate tribunal, and (b) contains such provisions as may be so approved for the purpose of giving effect so far as possible to the requirements of section 34 and Schedule 7;
8 and that conveyance shall be effective to vest in the person or persons to whom the conveyance is made the interests expressed to be conveyed, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the conveyance. (4) In connection with the determination by the appropriate tribunal of any question as to the interests to be conveyed by any such conveyance, or as to the rights with or subject to which they are to be conveyed, it shall be assumed (unless the contrary is shown) that any person whose interests are to be conveyed (“the transferor”) has no interest in property other than those interests and, for the purpose of excepting them from the conveyance, any minerals underlying the property in question. (5) The appropriate sum which in accordance with subsection (3) is to be paid into court in respect of any interest is the aggregate of— (a) such amount as may be determined by the appropriate tribunal to be the price which would be payable in respect of that interest in accordance with Schedule 6 if the interest were being acquired in pursuance of such a notice as is mentioned in subsection (1)(b); and (b) any amounts or estimated amounts determined by such a tribunal as being, at the time of execution of the conveyance, due to the transferor from any tenants of his of premises comprised in the premises in which that interest subsists (whether due under or in respect of their leases or under or in respect of agreements collateral thereto). (6) Where any interest is vested in any person or persons in accordance with this section, the payment into court of the appropriate sum in respect of that interest shall be taken to have satisfied any claims against the applicants for the vesting order under section 26(1), their personal representatives or assigns in respect of the price payable under this Chapter for the acquisition of that interest. (7) Where any interest is so vested in any person or persons, section 32(5) shall apply in relation to his or their acquisition of that interest as it applies in relation to the acquisition of any interest by a nominee purchaser.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Premium
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Lease Extension Premium
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Premium for Collective Enfranchisement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Orders Tenant to Pay £3,240 for New Lease Costs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds Most Service Charges as Reasonable
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Premium for New Lease Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Premium When Landlord Missing
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted New Lease Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonableness of Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Service Charge Sum Under Leasehold Reform Ac…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Statutory Lease Extension Granted Where Landlord Cannot Be Found
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenants Win Rent Repayment Orders for Unlicensed HMO
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The appropriate sum to be paid into Court for the transfer of the freehold interest is determined by the Tribunal.
- Service charges are payable if they are reasonably incurred and of a reasonable standard.
- When a landlord cannot be found, the Tribunal can determine the appropriate sum to be paid into Court for the landlord's interests.
- A tenant is entitled to a statutory lease extension where the landlord cannot be found.
- A freeholder is entitled to determine the appropriate sum for service charges and ground rent under the Leasehold Reform Act 1993.
- The appropriate premium for a lease extension is determined by considering the extended leasehold value and the relativity of the lease terms.
- A tenant is entitled to a rent repayment order if the landlord controls or manages an unlicensed HMO.
- A tenant is liable for reasonable costs incurred by a relevant person in connection with obtaining a new lease under section 56 of the Leasehold Reform Housing.
- Service charges are reasonable and payable if they are incurred reasonably and are of a reasonable standard.
- The tribunal must determine the fair premium for the collective enfranchisement of flats based on the evidence presented.
- A tenant is entitled to a new lease under section 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.
- A tenant is entitled to a new lease under the Leasehold Reform Act 1993, subject to the determination of the premium by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal determined the purchase price for the freehold interest in a property in Tottenham, London.
Who was involved?
The claimants and the respondent landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court accepted the valuation provided in the report and determined the purchase price based on the relativity graphs used in the valuation.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 sections 26 and 27 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The valuation report and the relativity graphs used in the valuation were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the claimants.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider obtaining a professional valuation and ensuring compliance with the relevant legal provisions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The valuation report and the relativity graphs used in the valuation were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving the valuation of freehold interests.
