VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Social Housing Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a social housing property in Croydon, considering comparables and landlord responsibilities under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The new rent was set at £288.46 per week.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their proposed new rent assessed by the First-tier Tribunal under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationsocial housinglandlord obligations

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. If the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can occur after a longer period, depending on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on various factors including the terms of the tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a social housing property in Croydon, considering comparables and the landlord's responsibilities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a social housing property in Croydon, considering comparables and the landlord's responsibilities under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The new rent was set at £288.46 per week.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference LON/OOAH/MNR/2026/0125 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] [COUNSEL] Tenant’s Representative none Landlord [NAME] Landlord’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Landlord’s Representative none Date of Application 06 March 2026 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members [NAME] [NAME] of Decision 18 May 2026 Rent Determined £288.46 per week – although the landlord may choose to charge less. Date the new rent takes effect 6 April 2026

2

REASONS FOR THE

DECISION Background 1. On 9 February 2026, the landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £196.74 per week (pw) in place of the existing rent of £187.73 pw to take effect from 6 April 2026.

2. On 6 March 2026 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the tenant referred the landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The tenancy commenced May 2017.

4. The Tribunal has considered all evidence submitted within the timetable set out by the Directions and subsequent oral testimony. The Tribunal has not recorded all evidence submitted within the decision. The omission of a piece of evidence should not be taken that it has not been taken into consideration.

5. Neither party requested the Tribunal inspect the property and the Tribunal given the submissions found that an inspection would be disproportionate. Preliminary Matters 6. Material received outside the Directions has not been considered. The inspection/determination 7. No inspection was made, and the matter was determined on the papers. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

8. The Tribunal has considered the written and verbal submissions of the parties.

9. The application notes the landlord is responsible for repairs and maintenance to the structure and exterior of the property, including the roof, walls, windows and doors. The landlord is also responsible for plumbing, heating systems, electrical wiring, drainage, and communal areas of the building, including building security systems and shared entrances.

3 10. The Tribunal finds in the absence of alternative contention the landlord is responsible for repairs, as set out above and section 11 Landlord and Tenant 1985 responsibilities insofar as they are not included above. The tenant is responsible for the remainder which will include interior decoration. Liability for Council Tax and Utilities 11. The Tribunal has considered the written and verbal submissions of the parties. The Tribunal finds; the tenant is responsible for the payment of utilities and council tax in respect of the Property. Inspection/Hearing 12. Neither party requested a hearing or an inspection, he matter was determined on the papers from the 91-page bundle The Property Extent and Specification 13. The Tribunal from review of papers finds [23/91] found the property is a second floor flat, comprising one bedroom, one living room, a kitchen, a bathroom and a storage cupboard. The property also has two balconies. Floor Area Second Living room ditto Kitchen ditto Bathroom ditto Bedroom 1 ditto Storage cupboard Improvements 14. No tenants' improvements are noted. Disrepair 15. The tenant noted that that a request to repair a faulty thermostat made to the landlord in December 25 remained outstanding. Specification

4 16. There are no details for the building specification in the bundle. However, photographs within the bundle show the property is built with double glazing, and central heating, carpets are supplied also. In the absence of information and the Tribunal’s expert knowledge it is likely the white goods are supplied by the landlord also.

17. The property has; Specification Provided by Central Heating LL Double Glazing LL Carpets LL White Goods LL Rental Evidence The Landlord 18. The landlord proposed that the rental level of the property should be £196.74 pw as at 6 April 2026.

19. The tenant provided in the bundle [ 74/91] , reference to their understanding of the landlord's position. that “an independent valuation using a RICS accredited Right Move AVM indicates a market rent of £1265 pcm which at 80% to reflect the social housing asset provides £218.63 per week. Tenant’s rental evidence 20. There is evidence in the bundle that at May 2017 the tenant was required to pay a service charge which amounted to £11.25 per week. There is no evidence of a current charge being made.

21. The tenant does not submit evidence of comparables. Determination and Valuation 22. The valuation date is the effective date of the rent proposed in the Notice of Increase. This is 6 April 2026.

23. The Tribunal values the property on the basis that; (a) The condition of the property disregards any tenant's improvements; there are none in this case.

5 (b) That the terms of the tenancy are such that tenant has responsibility for internal decoration and repairs (c) That the landlord has supplied the carpets, double glazing and central heating. (d) The Tribunal must make a determination under the Housing Act 1988 section 13 and 14 and cannot take into account the social or community nature of the development.

24. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables provided by the landlord, the Tribunal determines that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1250.00 pcm.

25. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made no adjustments. Market rent £1250.00pcm Undue hardship 26. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

27. The tenant has not asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case. Decision 28. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1250 per calendar month equivalent to £288.46 per week with effect from 6 April 2026. APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

6

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior, plumbing, heating, electrical, drainage, and communal areas.
  • The tenant is responsible for interior decoration and other repairs not covered by the landlord.
  • The tenant is responsible for paying utilities and council tax for the property.
  • The property is a second-floor flat with one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom, storage, and two balconies.
  • The market rent for the property was determined to be £1250.00 per calendar month.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's understanding of the landlord's valuation, which included an 80% reflection for social housing, was not accepted.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a social housing property in Croydon, setting it at £288.46 per week.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered comparables and the responsibilities of the landlord under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied in determining the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The comparables provided by the landlord and the responsibilities of the landlord under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were key to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant, as it determined a market rent based on comparables and landlord responsibilities.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a proposed rent increase can seek determination by the First-tier Tribunal under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparables provided by the landlord were crucial to determining the market rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Either party can appeal on a point of law within 28 days of the issue of the statement of reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.