VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Electrical Works

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal allowed a property management company to carry out urgent electrical repairs without consulting the tenants first, as there were no objections raised by the tenants and the repairs were deemed necessary to prevent further disruption to the power supply.

⚖️ Legal holding

An applicant may obtain dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 if the works are urgent and there is no prejudice to the respondents.

Topics

dispensation from consultationurgent electrical worksLandlord and Tenant Act 1985

Provisions

section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

The First-tier Tribunal can grant an exemption from consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements if it finds it reasonable to do so. Consultation requirements can include providing details of proposed works to tenants, obtaining estimates, inviting tenants to suggest estimators, considering tenant observations, and giving reasons for actions in certain circumstances.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal granted dispensation for urgent electrical works under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted dispensation to the applicant for urgent electrical works at a residential property, bypassing the statutory consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 due to the urgent nature of the works and the absence of objections from the respondents.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference : LON/00BE/LDC/2023/0034 Property : 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : N/A Respondents : [redacted] [POSTCODE]

Representative : N/A

Type of application : Application for dispensation to consult – section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal : Judge Tagliavini Date of decision : 12 July 2023

DECISION

2

The tribunal’s summary decision

(1.) The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of urgent electrical works required and carried out at 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] as set out in the electrician’s report dated 24 October 2022 and as quoted by [COMPANY] 12 January 2023. _________________________________________________________

The application

1. This is an application made pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) seeking dispensation for the consultation requirements in respect of urgent electrical works required at the subject premises situate at 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘the premises’).

Background to the application 2. The applicant has applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect replacement of all three cables, rye fields distribution boards and possibly some of the trunking where it is rusted or parts are missing and the cupboards doors are allowing in water. As a consequence, the electrical power supply to the whole building is disrupted. The full extent of these repairs is outline in the electrician’s report dated 24th October 2022.

3. The estimated cost of the works is £24,256.80 including VAT which is outline in a quote from [COMPANY] 12th January 2023.

4. The premises comprise a purpose built residential property consisting of one block split in cores numbered 4-9 and 13-20 and with 2 communal entrances and 5 private flats, housing 20 residential units on the lower ground to 3rd floor. The landlord is Weltonvale ([ADDRESS]) [RESPONDENT].

5. The leaseholders have been notified by email of the cost of works and been provided with a copy of the electrician’s report. The application is said to be urgent because this involves a fault with the electrics that trips the power supply to the whole building and although a temporary fix has been implemented it is not guaranteed to last for any length of time. The applicant’s case 6. The applicant relied upon its documentary evidence. In an email dated 26 April 2023 the applicant confirmed no objections to the application had been

3

received from the lessee respondents by the deadline of 21 April 2023 (as per the tribunal’s directions dated 28 March 2023). The hearing

7. The application was determined by the tribunal on the papers as no party requested an oral hearing. In making its decision the tribunal took into account the information provided by the applicant by way of a bundle comprising 32 electronic pages. No documentation was received from the respondent lessees.

The tribunal’s decision and reasons

8. The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of the urgent electrical works required at 37 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] as detailed in the quote of [COMPANY] dated 12 February 2023.

9. The tribunal has had regard to the urgent nature of the works and the absence of any objection by the respondents to either the works that have been carried out or to this application. The tribunal has also considered the absence of prejudice caused by the lack of consultation pursuant to section 20 of the 2985 Act in respect of the works for which the applicant seeks dispensation. Therefore, in the circumstances the tribunal considers it reasonable and proportionate to grant the application sought; [COMPANY] v Benson and others [2013] UKSC 14.

Name: Judge Tagliavini

Date: 12 July 2023

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.

4

The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The works are considered urgent.
  • There is no prejudice to the respondents.
  • The works are cost-effective.
  • The works are deemed necessary.
  • The works are essential.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant dispensation to the property management company to carry out urgent electrical works without consulting the tenants first.

Who was involved?

The property management company and the tenants of a residential property were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant dispensation because the works were urgent and there were no objections from the tenants.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the urgent need for the electrical works and the lack of objections from the tenants.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to obtain dispensation for urgent works if they can show the works are necessary and there are no objections from the affected parties.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The electrician's report and the quote from the property management company were important pieces of evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.