First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass consulting tenants about urgent a person a person works because the works were necessary and urgent, as per section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
⚖️ Legal holding
In cases of urgent a person a person works, a landlord may be dispensed from consulting lessees under certain conditions.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consulting lessees about urgent a person a person works.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consulting lessee tenants about urgent fire safety works at Fairfields, 15 Broadwater Road, Worthing, based on the necessity and urgency of the works as determined by Judge Tildesley OBE.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
:
CHI/ 45UH/LDC/2018/0098
Property
:
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE].
Applicant: [redacted]
:
[COUNSEL]
Respondents
:
[redacted]
Representative
:
-
Type of Application
:
To dispense with the requirement to consult lessees about major works
Tribunal Member(s)
:
Judge Tildesley OBE
Date and Venue of Hearing
:
Determination on Papers
Date of Decision
:
14 January 2019
DECISION
2
The Application
1. This is an application for dispensation from the consultation requirements provided for in section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
2. The Applicant explains that following an inspection of the property by [NAME] on 2 July 2018, the [NAME] [NAME] required the Applicant by letter dated 31 July 2018 to carry out works to ensure the [NAME] of residents.
3. The Applicant have instructed [COMPANY] to carry out the works to an agreed specification and price.
4. The Applicant states that due to the urgency of the works it does not have time to go through the statutory consultation procedures. The Applicant, however, has made all leaseholders aware of the nature of the works.
5. The Application for dispensation was received on 30 November 2018.
6. On 30 November 2018 the Tribunal directed the Applicant to serve a copy of the application and directions on each leaseholder and display a copy of the application in a prominent position in the common parts of the property. On 7 December 2018 the Applicant informed the Tribunal that it had displayed the application in the communal areas of the property.
7. The directions also required the leaseholders to return a pro-forma to the Tribunal by 20 December 2018 indicating whether they agreed or disagreed with the application and whether they consented to a determination on the papers.
8. The Applicant served the Tribunal with a hearing bundle of documents on 9 January 2019.
9. The Tribunal received responses from one leaseholder: Mr [NAME] of Flat 19 who agreed with the application and made no request for an oral hearing.
Determination
10. The Tribunal is satisfied from the application and the documents included in the hearing bundle that the [NAME] [NAME] works were necessary, and urgent.
11. The Tribunal received no objection from a leaseholder to the application.
3 12. The Tribunal, therefore, dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the [NAME] [NAME] works as set out in the specification supplied by [COMPANY].
13. This decision is confined to the dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the [NAME] [NAME] works. The Tribunal has made no determination on whether the costs of those works are reasonable or payable. If a leaseholder wishes to challenge the reasonableness of those costs, then a separate application under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 would have to be made.
14. The Tribunal will send the decision to Mr [APPELLANT].
15. The Tribunal requires the Applicant to notify the remaining leaseholders of the decision and confirm in writing that it has carried out the Tribunal’s instruction.
4
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation From Consultation Requirem…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Entitled to Recover Costs for Major Works Under Lease Terms
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Health and Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Exemption for Fire Safety Works Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs Due to Water Ing…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Works Dispensation Due to Storm Damage
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Ventilation System Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Major Works
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The works are urgent and necessary for safety.
- There is no relevant prejudice caused to the tenants.
- The landlord can reasonably obtain dispensation from consultation requirements.
- The works fall under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- The works are deemed essential and urgent by the court.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified as leading to a decision against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant dispensation from consulting lessees about urgent fire safety works.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the lessee tenants were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the necessity and urgency of the fire safety works.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the necessity and urgency of the fire safety works.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be granted dispensation if their fire safety works are deemed necessary and urgent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the necessity and urgency of the fire safety works was critical.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person wishing to appeal this decision must seek permission to do so within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
