First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Urgent Boundary Work
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal granted permission for a landlord to bypass full consultation with tenants before carrying out necessary repairs on a boundary wall. This was allowed because of an urgent requirement from the local council and concerns about property insurance.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may receive dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 if it is reasonable to do so, such as when facing urgent work necessitated by a council notice or insurance concerns.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to skip certain consultation requirements related to building works or long-term agreements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for works to the boundary wall due to a council notice and insurance issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for a landlord to undertake urgent boundary wall repairs at a property in Liverpool, due to a council notice and insurance issues.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Case Reference : MAN/00BY/LDC/2023/0039
Property : 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondents : [redacted] Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 – Section 20ZA
Tribunal Members : [APPELLANT] of Decision : 30 October 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
1
Summary Decision
1. The Tribunal gives dispensation from the consultation requirements.
Application
2. This application has been made by [APPELLANT] (the applicant) for dispensation from the consultation requirements imposed by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the Act’) with regard to works to the boundary wall of 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (‘the property’). The applicant completed the works on 30 May 2023.
3. Directions were issued on 15 August 2023. Those directions made it clear that the application does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs resulting from any such works are reasonable or indeed payable and it will be open to lessees to challenge any such charged by the applicant. The directions allowed for the matter to be resolved by way of written evidence. No party sought an oral hearing.
4. Further to the Directions, the applicant provided a bundle of documents. The respondents did not provide any statements in response.
The Law
5. Section 20 of the Act limits certain service charges unless the consultation requirements in the section are complied with or dispensed with under section 20ZA. Section 20ZA provides:
(1) Where an application is made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements.
The Facts
6. The property contains 8 flats. In January 2023 the [NAME] instructed [NAME] ([NAME]) to inspect and report on the remedial works required to the boundary wall to the rear of the property. They provided a report on 16 February 2023 that advised that due to the condition of the wall it needed to be demolished and re-built.
7. On 3 April 2023 the applicant sent s.20 consultation notices to the respondents for the works.
2
8. On 17 May 2023, Liverpool Council served a notice on the applicant under the Building Act 1984, s.77 requiring remedial work involving taking down the wall to the rear of the property within 14 days. The applicant emailed the respondents on 26 May 2023 to inform then that in the light of the s.77 notice the work to demolish the wall would start on 30 May, 2023.
9. On 5 June 2023 the application for dispensation was made.
10. On 8 June 2023 the respondents were emailed to be informed that an interim invoice to the works would be raised and that they would be consulted on the replacement for the wall.
Reasons to dispense with the consultation requirements
11. The application sought dispensation because of the notice from Liverpool Council. We agree that this and the insurance issues set out in the email of 26 May 2023 are good grounds to dispense with consultation.
Decision
12. For the reasons set out in the application we consider that it is reasonable to give dispensation.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL 13. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office, which has been dealing with the case.
14. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
15. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, that person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
16. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Drain Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Urgent Works Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs in Multi-Story Buildin…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Boiler Flue Replacement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Environmental Work
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Major Lift Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Replacement Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation in First-tier Tribunal Ca…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Structural Works
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements because Liverpool Council issued a notice requiring urgent remedial work.
- Dispensation was also granted due to concerns about insurance issues related to the boundary wall.
- The tribunal found it reasonable to grant dispensation based on the reasons provided in the application.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal decided to grant dispensation for the landlord to bypass full consultation with tenants before carrying out repairs on a boundary wall.
Who was involved?
A landlord and multiple tenants were involved in this case, concerning works to a boundary wall at their property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that it was reasonable to grant dispensation due to an urgent council notice requiring work on the wall and insurance issues.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and Section 77 of the Building Act 1984 were key provisions in this decision.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency of the work required by a council notice and insurance concerns were central to the court's reasoning.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, allowing them to proceed with dispensation from consultation requirements.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing urgent repairs due to council notices or insurance issues may be able to seek dispensation from full tenant consultation.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The council notice and the building surveyor's report on the condition of the wall were crucial pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person wishing to appeal must seek permission from the First-tier Tribunal within 28 days of receiving written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to consult with a qualified solicitor for advice on your specific situation.
