First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to skip the usual consultation process with tenants because the landlord needed to make urgent and necessary repairs to the building. This decision was made under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if the works are urgent and necessary.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to skip the consultation requirements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so. The consultation requirements refer to specific obligations set by regulations made by the Secretary of State, which might include providing details of proposed works to tenants, obtaining estimates, and considering tenants' observations.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA due to urgent repairs.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, allowing the landlord to bypass the usual consultation process due to urgent and necessary repairs to the property. Judge F J Silverman presided over the case.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AW/LDC/2019/0030 Property : 31 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [APPELLANT] Respondent : [redacted] application Representative : Did not appear and were not represented Type of Application : [POSTCODE] Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal Members : Judge [NAME] Fr LLM
Date and venue of Paper determination : 26 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 26 March 2019
DECISION
2
REASONS
1. The Applicant seeks a determination of its application for dispensation from the consultation requirements imposed by s. 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
2. The Application to the Tribunal was made on 18 February 2019.
3. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on 20 February 2019.
4. The Tribunal did not consider that it was necessary to inspect the property.
5. The property comprises a mansion block of 3 flats spread over five floors. In September 2018 an electrician attended the property to carry out an Electrical Inspection Condition Report the result of which was unsatisfactory. Further investigation revealed parts of the installation to be in a dangerous condition.
6. The Applicant considered that it was necessary to remedy this problem without delay and an independent assessment of the situation concluded that substantial repairs, the costs of which would exceed the s20 limit, were required.
7. The Applicant decided that it was in the best interests of the [NAME] to proceed with the repairs immediately and this was done.
8. The [NAME] were all notified of the situation and have all been notified of the Applicant’s application for dispensation under s20ZA.
9. The Applicant now seeks dispensation from the further procedures under s20 as all the works have been satisfactorily completed.
10. None of the [NAME] has objected to the s20ZA application.
11. The Tribunal is being asked to exercise its discretion under s.20ZA of the Act. The wording of s.20ZA is significant. Subs. (1) provides:
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
3 “Where an application is made to a [leasehold valuation] tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements (emphasis added).”
12. The Tribunal understands that the purposes of the consultation requirements is to ensure that leaseholders are given the fullest possible opportunity to make observations about expenditure of money for which they will in part be liable.
13. Having considered the bundle of papers prepared for the Tribunal by the Applicant the Tribunal is satisfied that works undertaken were sufficiently urgent and necessary to permit them to exercise their discretion in the Applicant’s favour. The Tribunal did not consider that any prejudice would be caused to either party by granting dispensation as requested.
14. In these circumstances the Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to exercise its discretion to dispense with the statutory requirements for consultation.
Judge [NAME] as Chairman Date 26 March 2019
Note: Appeals
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4 4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Sewage Works Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation Without Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Roof Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Boundary Wall Works
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Substantial repairs were needed, and their cost would exceed the legal limit for consultation.
- The landlord decided to proceed with the repairs immediately, which was in the best interest of the residents.
- The works undertaken were urgent and necessary, justifying the tribunal's discretion to grant dispensation.
- Granting dispensation would not cause any unfairness to either party.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord to skip the usual consultation process with tenants because of urgent repairs.
Who was involved?
The landlord and several tenants were involved.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency and necessity of the repairs were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to get dispensation if their repairs are urgent and necessary.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the urgency and necessity of the repairs was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
