Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Sewage Works Without Consultation
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission for a landlord to carry out urgent repairs on a collapsed drain affecting sewage flow without consulting the tenants first. The works were considered necessary and urgent, allowing the landlord to proceed without the usual consultation process.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if the works are urgent and necessary.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tribunal to grant dispensation from consultation requirements if it deems it reasonable to do so. It specifies that 'qualifying works' refer to works on a building or premises, and 'qualifying long term agreement' refers to an agreement lasting over twelve months. The consultation requirements involve providing details of proposed works or agreements to tenants, obtaining estimates, inviting tenants to suggest estimators, considering tenant observations, and giving reasons for certain actions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements due to urgent works needed.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for a landlord to carry out urgent works affecting sewage flow for a block of flats. The works were deemed necessary and urgent, justifying the dispensation.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AT/LDC/2019/0144 Property : 1 – 12, 14, and [ADDRESS] : [APPELLANT] :
Respondent : [redacted] APPLICATION Representative : n/a Type of Application : For dispensation from the consultation requirements required by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal Members : Judge Carr Mr Mathews FRICS Date of Decision : 7th June 2019
DECISION
2
Decision of the Tribunal 1. The Tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements contained in Part 2 of Schedule 4 to the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) England) Regulations 2003. The Application 2. [NAME] [NAME], on behalf of [COMPANY], managing agents for the freeholder of the premises, applied on 17th April 2019 under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for dispensation from the consultation requirements contained in Part 2 of Schedule 4 to the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) England) Regulations 2003. Procedure 3. The Tribunal held a case management review of this matter on 8th May 2019 and issued directions on the same date. In those directions it was decided that in view of the urgency of the application the matter should be determined on the basis of written representations and without an oral hearing.
4. The Directions gave an opportunity for any party to request an oral hearing. They also gave an opportunity for any [NAME] who wishes to oppose the application from the landlord to provide a statement to the Tribunal setting out his or her reasons for so doing. None of the parties requested an oral hearing, nor did any [NAME] object and therefore the matter is being determined on the basis of the documents provided. Determination The Evidence 5. The evidence before the Tribunal indicates as follows: a. The property is a purpose built block of 14 flats. b. There is a collapsed drain to the building which is affecting sewage flow for the whole of the building and causing blockage to toilets. c. The managing agents instructed a contractor to provide a quotation for necessary works. These comprise a localised
3
excavation of defective pipework, replacement with new UPVC pipework and fittings, and a CCTV conditional survey report with any further necessary recommendations. d. The Applicants wish to carry the work out urgently. e. The managing agents therefore applied to the Tribunal for dispensation from the consultation requirements on the basis of the urgent nature of the works which is causing distress and inconvenience. f. Following the issue of directions, the managing agents communicated with all of the lessees about the proposed works and their urgency. No objections were received in connection with the proposed works. The Law 6. The Tribunal is being asked to exercise its discretion under s.20ZA of the Act. The wording of s.20ZA is significant. Subs. (1) provides: 7. “Where an application is made to a leasehold valuation tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements” (emphasis added). The Tribunal’s decision.
8. The Tribunal determines to grant the application. The reasons for the Tribunal’s decision.
9. The Tribunal considers that the works are necessary and urgent.
10. The parties should note that this determination does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs will be reasonable or indeed payable. The Respondents are able, if it appears to them to be appropriate, to make an application under s.27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as to reasonableness and payability.
Signed Judge Carr
Dated 7th June 2019
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Roof Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation Without Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freeholder Granted Urgent Repairs Dispensation Without Consultation
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined that the works were necessary and urgent.
- A collapsed drain was affecting sewage flow and causing toilet blockages for the entire building.
- The managing agents applied for dispensation due to the urgent nature of the works causing distress and inconvenience.
- No lessees objected to the proposed works after being informed by the managing agents.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord to carry out urgent repairs without consulting the tenants first.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenants of a block of flats were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the landlord's request because the works were urgent and necessary.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 20ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the works were urgent and necessary was the most important.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to get dispensation from consultation requirements if the works are urgent and necessary.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence showing the urgency and necessity of the works was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
