First-tier Tribunal Grants Lease Variation Order Under Section 37
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted an order to delete a clause from the leases after all leaseholders agreed. The clause required the landlord to provide an alarm system, emergency response service, and a person.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, an a person can be made to vary leases if the majority of parties consent.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, an application can be made to a tribunal to vary leases if certain conditions are met. These include that the leases are long-term leases of flats with the same landlord, and that the majority of parties involved must consent. Specifically, if the application involves less than nine leases, all or all but one of the parties must agree. If it involves more than eight leases, then at least 75% of the parties must consent and no more than 10% can oppose it.
This section allows a tribunal to make an order varying leases if the grounds for the application are proven satisfactory. It specifies that the tribunal can make variations based on applications under sections 35, 36, or 37, provided that the necessary conditions are met, including the establishment of the grounds for variation to the tribunal's satisfaction.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The First-tier Tribunal granted an order under Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to delete a clause from the leases.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted an order under Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to delete a clause from the leases after all leaseholders consented. The clause required the landlord to provide an alarm system, emergency response service, and warden.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Case References : MAN/36UD/LVT/2019/0002
Property : 1-12 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondents : [redacted]
Type of [NAME] : Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 – Section 37
Tribunal Members : [NAME] (Tribunal Judge)
[NAME] (Regional Surveyor)
Date of determination : 16 March 2020
_______________________________________________
DECISION _______________________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 [NAME]
1. [APPELLANT] applies for an order under Section 35 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 (the Act) for an order for varying the Leases of the apartments and houses at the Property. The Respondents are the owners of the Leasehold interest in the apartments and houses.
2. The [NAME] was received by the Tribunal on 9 May 2019. By directions dated 2 July 2019 a Tribunal Judge directed that in the absence of a request by either party the [NAME] would be determined on the papers. The Tribunal has not received a request for a hearing and the [NAME] has been determined on the papers.
The Property
3. The Property is a former gatehouse and stable block converted into residential apartments and houses in 1983. The dwellings are let on Residential Leases. The Applicant is the owner of the Leasehold interest.
Evidence and Submissions
4. The Leases of the dwellings are in common form. A sample Lease has been provided.
5. The Applicant’s request arises from a unanimous decision of the Leaseholders to cease an alarm system, emergency response service and [NAME] currently required to be provided by the Landlord under Clause 4(5) of the Leases.
6. The Applicant has provided signed consents from all Leaseholders.
7. The Applicant applies for a variation of the Lease under Section 37 of the Act by deletion of Clause 4(5) of the Leases.
The Law
8. Section 37 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. [NAME] by majority of parties for variation of Leases (1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, an [NAME] may be made to the court in respect of two or more Leases for an order varying each of those Leases in such manner as is specified in the [NAME]. (2)Those Leases must be long Leases of flats under which the landlord is the same person, but they need not be Leases of flats which are in the same building, nor Leases which are drafted in identical terms. (3)The grounds on which an [NAME] may be made under this section are that the object to be achieved by the variation cannot be satisfactorily achieved unless all the Leases are varied to the same effect. (4)An [NAME] under this section in respect of any Leases may be made by the landlord or any of the tenants under the Leases. (5)Any such [NAME] shall only be made if— (a)in a case where the [NAME] is in respect of less than nine Leases, all, or all but one, of the parties concerned consent to it; or (b)in a case where the [NAME] is in respect of more than eight Leases, it is not opposed for any reason by more than 10 per cent. of the total number of the parties concerned and at least 75 per cent. of that number consent to it.
3 (6)For the purposes of subsection (5)— (a)in the case of each Lease in respect of which the [NAME] is made, the tenant under the Lease shall constitute one of the parties concerned (so that in determining the total number of the parties concerned a person who is the tenant under a number of such Leases shall be regarded as constituting a corresponding number of the parties concerned); and (b)the landlord shall also constitute one of the parties concerned.
9. Section 38 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. Orders by the court varying Leases (1)If, on an [NAME] under section 35, the grounds on which the [NAME] was made are established to the satisfaction of the court, the court may (subject to subsections (6) and (7)) make an order varying the Lease specified in the [NAME] in such manner as is specified in the order. (2)If—(a) an [NAME] under section 36 was made in connection with that [NAME], and(b)the grounds set out in subsection (3) of that section are established to the satisfaction of the court with respect to the Leases specified in the [NAME] under section 36, the court may (subject to subsections (6) and (7)) also make an order varying each of those Leases in such manner as is specified in the order. (3)If, on an [NAME] under section 37, the grounds set out in subsection (3) of that section are established to the satisfaction of the court with respect to the Leases specified in the [NAME], the court may (subject to subsections (6) and (7)) make an order varying each of those Leases in such manner as is specified in the order. (4)The variation specified in an order under subsection (1) or (2) may be either the variation specified in the relevant [NAME] under section 35 or 36 or such other variation as the court thinks fit. (5)If the grounds referred to in subsection (2) or (3) (as the case may be) are established to the satisfaction of the court with respect to some but not all of the Leases specified in the [NAME], the power to make an order under that subsection shall extend to those Leases only. (6)The court shall not make an order under this section effecting any variation of a Lease if it appears to the court— (a)that the variation would be likely substantially to prejudice— (i)any respondent to the [NAME], or (ii)any person who is not a party to the [NAME], and that an award under subsection (10) would not afford him adequate compensation, or (b)that for any other reason it would not be reasonable in the circumstances for the variation to be effected. (7)The court shall not, on an [NAME] relating to the provision to be made by a Lease with respect to insurance, make an order under this section effecting any variation of the Lease— (a)which terminates any existing right of the landlord under its terms to nominate an insurer for insurance purposes; or (b)which requires the landlord to nominate a number of insurers from which the tenant would be entitled to select an insurer for those purposes; or (c)which, in a case where the Lease requires the tenant to effect insurance with a specified insurer, requires the tenant to effect insurance otherwise than with another specified insurer. (8)The court may, instead of [NAME] an order varying a Lease in such manner as is specified in the order, make an order directing the parties to the Lease to vary it in
4 such manner as is so specified; and accordingly any reference in this Part (however expressed) to an order which effects any variation of a Lease or to any variation effected by an order shall include a reference to an order which directs the parties to a Lease to effect a variation of it or (as the case may be) a reference to any variation effected in pursuance of such an order. (9)The court may by order direct that a memorandum of any variation of a Lease effected by an order under this section shall be endorsed on such documents as are specified in the order. (10)Where the court makes an order under this section varying a Lease the court may, if it thinks fit, make an order providing for any party to the Lease to pay, to any other party to the Lease or to any other person, compensation in respect of any loss or disadvantage that the court considers he is likely to suffer as a result of the variation.
10. Section 39 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. Effect of orders varying Leases: applications by third parties (1)Any variation effected by an order under section 38 shall be binding not only on the parties to the Lease for the time being but also on other persons (including any predecessors in title of those parties), whether or not they were parties to the proceedings in which the order was made or were served with a notice by virtue of section 35(5). (2)Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), any variation effected by any such order shall be binding on any surety who has guaranteed the performance of any obligation varied by the order; and the surety shall accordingly be taken to have guaranteed the performance of that obligation as so varied. (3)Where any such order has been made and a person was, by virtue of section 35(5), required to be served with a notice relating to the proceedings in which it was made, but he was not so served, he may— (a)bring an action for damages for breach of statutory duty against the person by whom any such notice was so required to be served in respect of that person’s failure to serve it; (b)apply to the court for the cancellation or modification of the variation in question. (4)The court may, on an [NAME] under subsection (3)(b) with respect to any variation of a Lease— (a)by order cancel that variation or modify it in such manner as is specified in the order, or (b)make such an order as is mentioned in section 38(10) in favour of the [NAME], as it thinks fit. (5)Where a variation is cancelled or modified under paragraph (a) of subsection (4)— (a)the cancellation or modification shall take effect as from the date of the [NAME] of the order under that paragraph or as from such later date as may be specified in the order, and (b)the court may by order direct that a memorandum of the cancellation or modification shall be endorsed on such documents as are specified in the order; and, in a case where a variation is so modified, subsections (1) and (2) above shall, as from the date when the modification takes effect, apply to the variation as modified.
5 11. Reference to the Court shall include the First Tier Tribunal.
Further Submissions
12. The Applicant states that with the agreement of all residents, the employment of the [NAME] was dispensed with at least six years ago and since then the Applicant has relied on the emergency alarm system which is linked to a remote 24 hour monitoring centre to fulfil the Landlord’s obligations …….. [ADDRESS] Association, acting on behalf of the residents of the twelve units at [ADDRESS], has requested that the existing Emergency Alarm System be decommissioned and the associated 24 emergency alarm monitoring service be removed.
13. The Applicant has provided a draft of the variation sought which comprises a deletion.
Tribunal’s Conclusions
14. An [NAME] can be made under Section 37 of the Act. The Tribunal has to consider 2 issues.
Is it necessary to vary all of the Leases? 15. Noting the objective we determine that it would not be possible to achieve the objective unless all Leases are varied.
Requisite consent 16. All relevant parties including the Landlord are in agreement and consent. This is above the percentage required.
17. Following our findings we conclude that the order proposed by the Applicant should be made to give effect to the variation proposed.
18. We further determine under Section 38(9) that a memorandum of the variation of the Leases affected by our order under shall be endorsed thereon.
Order
19. The Tribunal orders that the Leases of the dwellings at the Property are varied by deletion of paragraph 4(5).
20. A memorandum of the variation shall be endorsed on the Leases.
[NAME] Tribunal Judge 16 March 2020
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Lease Variation for Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation for Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Lease Variations to Modernise Occupational Lease…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Lease Variation for Alterations and Additions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation for Energy Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Changes for Non-Resident Management
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Lease Variations
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation for Heating System Change
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation for Service Charge Recovery
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Lease Variation Under s.37
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Varies Leases for 31 Flats to Correct Errors and Align Rent Review…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation Under Section 37
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The majority of parties consented to the lease variation.
- The variation was necessary to achieve a specific objective.
- The variation was supported by the statutory criteria under Section 37.
- The variation addressed issues such as energy improvements or cost recovery.
- The variation clarified property boundaries or rights.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant an order under Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to delete a clause from the leases.
Who was involved?
The landlord and leaseholders were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the order because all leaseholders consented to the variation.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, specifically Sections 37 and 38, were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that all leaseholders consented to the variation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation could seek a variation of their leases if all leaseholders consent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Signed consents from all leaseholders mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.
