VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Grants Lease Variation for Service Charges

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal approved a request to change lease agreements to streamline how service charges are handled and update the lease terms. This decision was unanimously supported by all parties involved.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Section 37 allows for the variation of leases if it is necessary to achieve a certain objective and all parties consent.

Topics

variation of leasesservice charges

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s.37

Under this section, an application can be made to a tribunal to vary leases if it meets certain conditions. These include that the leases must be long leases of flats under the same landlord, though they don't have to be in the same building or written identically. The application must aim to achieve an objective that cannot be accomplished without varying all the leases in the same way. Additionally, the application requires the consent of all or nearly all parties involved if it concerns less than nine leases, or if it involves more than eight leases, then it must not be opposed by more than 10% of the parties and at least 75% of those must consent.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The First-tier Tribunal granted an application to vary leases to allow for a unified approach to service charges and modernise the lease terms.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted an application to vary leases to allow for a unified approach to service charges and modernise the lease terms. The application was supported by all interested parties and met the requirements of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Section 37.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

:

CHI/45UH/LVT/2020/0005 & 0006

Property

:

[ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Goring-by-Sea, Worthing

Applicant: [redacted] Limited and the long lessees

Representative

:

[COUNSEL] [RESPONDENT]

Respondent: [redacted]

(1) [COMPANY] (2) [RESPONDENT]

:

Type of Application

:

Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 Section 37 Variation of a lease

Tribunal Member(s)

:

Judge D. R. Whitney

Date of Determination

:

22nd January 2021

DETERMINATION

Background

2 1. The Applicant, [ADDRESS] Association Limited manages the Property, [ADDRESS], Worthing.

2. The Property consists of an estate made up of 6 blocks of flats with 48 flats in total. All 48 leaseholders joined in with making the application.

3. The two companies named as Respondents are the freeholders of [ADDRESS]. A separate application was made in respect of each separate freehold.

4. Directions were issued in respect of both claims on 4th December 2021. These directions provided that both claims would be consolidated and dealt with together. The Applicant’s solicitors have provided two electronic bundles. The bundles are in similar form and references in [] are to pages within the bundle of case CHI/45UH/LVT/2020/0005. In reaching its determination the Tribunal considered both bundles.

The Law

5. The relevant law is set out in section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (“the Act”) a copy of which is annexed hereto marked A.

Determination

6. The directions provided that the matter was to be determined on paper. The Tribunal notes that no parties have objected to such determination. I did consider the bundle and I am satisfied that this case remains suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with the Tribunal rules.

7. The Application [1-12] sets out what is sought. The [COMPANY] manages the development as a whole. The [NAME] each own part of the freehold. The Application contains a full list of all 48 leaseholders and the freeholders [15-20].

8. Within the bundle are copy sample leases and deeds of variation for each of the 6 blocks within the estate. The Applicant confirms that all of the leases are substantially in the same form. The Applicant seeks to vary the leases to give effect to the method in practice adopted for dealing with service charges and to modernise the lease.

9. As drafted each block should pay for its own repairs and maintenance. In practice the [COMPANY] has dealt with the estate as one, with each flat contributing equally to the costs. I am told this has been the practice for many years.

10. Within the bundle are copies of consents from all 50 interested parties (48 leaseholders and two freeholders) other than the [COMPANY] [178-228]. It is confirmed within the Application that the

3 [COMPANY] itself consents to the proposed variation. In accordance with the directions the [COMPANY] served copies of the Application and the directions upon all parties and no objections have been received.

11. I am satisfied that the application to vary the leases is unanimously supported by all interested parties. I am satisfied that the qualifying requirements of section 37 of the Act are met.

12. Further I am satisfied that the object to be achieved by the variation requires all leases to be varied. I am satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to vary the leases in the way sought.

13. I confirm that I make order in the terms attached marked Annex B.

Annex A

Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

Application by majority of parties for variation of leases.

(1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, an application may be made to the appropriate tribunal in respect of two or more leases for an order varying each of those leases in such manner as is specified in the application.

(2)Those leases must be long leases of flats under which the landlord is the same person, but they need not be leases of flats which are in the same building, nor leases which are drafted in identical terms.

(3)The grounds on which an application may be made under this section are that the object to be achieved by the variation cannot be satisfactorily achieved unless all the leases are varied to the same effect.

(4)An application under this section in respect of any leases may be made by the landlord or any of the tenants under the leases.

(5)Any such application shall only be made if—

(a)in a case where the application is in respect of less than nine leases, all, or all but one, of the parties concerned consent to it; or

(b)in a case where the application is in respect of more than eight leases, it is not opposed for any reason by more than 10 per cent. of the total number of the parties concerned and at least 75 per cent. of that number consent to it.

(6)For the purposes of subsection (5)—

(a)in the case of each lease in respect of which the application is made, the tenant under the lease shall constitute one of the parties concerned (so that in determining the total number of the parties concerned a person who is the

4 tenant under a number of such leases shall be regarded as constituting a corresponding number of the parties concerned); and

(b)the landlord shall also constitute one of the parties concerned.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The variation is necessary to achieve a specific objective, such as implementing energy improvements.
  • All parties involved have given their consent to the variation.
  • The variation cannot be satisfactorily achieved without changing all relevant leases.
  • The variation clarifies the demised premises and the landlord's retained land.
  • The variation transfers responsibilities for repairs and maintenance to the appropriate party.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant the application to vary the leases to allow for a unified approach to service charges and modernise the lease terms.

Who was involved?

The application was made by the residents association managing the property and the long lessees, while the freeholders were the respondents.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant the application because it was supported by all interested parties and met the criteria set out in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Section 37.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Section 37 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the variation was necessary to achieve a certain objective and was supported by all interested parties.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might be able to vary their leases if they can show that it meets the criteria set out in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Section 37.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence and documents such as sample leases, deeds of variation, and consents from all interested parties mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court if there are grounds for appeal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.