First-tier Tribunal Varies Leases for Window Maintenance Responsibilities
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal changed the leases to give the property management company control over window repairs and maintenance instead of individual a person. This decision was made under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, a residential property management company can vary leases to transfer responsibilities for repairs and maintenance to the freeholder.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, an application can be made to a tribunal to vary leases if certain conditions are met. These conditions include that the leases must be long leases of flats under the same landlord, though they don't have to be in the same building or drafted identically. Additionally, the application requires either unanimous consent from all parties involved except one, or the support of at least 75% of the parties with no more than 10% opposing it when there are more than eight leases involved.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal varied the leases to transfer responsibility for window repairs and maintenance from a person to the freeholder.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal varied the leases to transfer the responsibility for repairing and maintaining windows from leaseholders to the freeholder, under Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
:
CHI/00ML/LVT/2020/0007
Property
:
[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant
:
[redacted]
:
[NAME]
Respondent: [redacted]
:
Type of Application
:
Variation of a lease pursuant to Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987
Tribunal Member(s)
:
Judge D. R. Whitney
Date of Decision
:
12th February 2021
DETERMINATION
2 This is a formal order of the Tribunal which must be complied with by the parties.
The Tribunal Judge directs that the parties must comply with the Statement on Tribunal Rules and Procedure issued August 2020 and the Guidance on PDF bundles dated August 2020, which are enclosed with these directions (if not already provided).
Due to the Covid 19 pandemic, communications to the Tribunal MUST be made by email to [EMAIL]. All communications must clearly state the Case Number and address of the premises.
Background
1. The Applicant seeks to vary all the leases at the development pursuant to section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act so that the Applicant shall be responsible for repairing and replacing the windows in the flats.
2. The Tribunal issued directions on 9th October 2020 and various other sets of directions. The Applicant has now produced an electronic bundle and references in [] are to pages within that bundle.
The Law
3. The relevant law is set out in section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 a copy of which is annexed hereto marked A.
Determination
4. The Applicant is an [COMPANY] which manages the Property. The freehold belongs to [ADDRESS]. The Property is an 8- storey block of flats with 42 leasehold flats.
5. The Applicant is looking to undertake various external refurbishment works. The leases provide that responsibility for maintenance and repair of the windows and window frames is that of the individual [NAME]. The Applicant relies upon a report dated 5th November 2020 from a [NAME] [199-201]. This suggests given the way the windows are installed and interact with cladding at the Property it may be impractical for individual [NAME] to repair and maintain their own windows.
6. The report suggests that it would be preferable for the Applicant to carry out window replacement.
7. The Applicant suggests that the current leasing scheme does not allow this given the windows are the responsibility of the [NAME]. The application relies upon two statements made by Mr [NAME], the managing agent [189-192]. It appears original leases were granted
3 and certain [NAME] have varied their leases by way of deeds of variation. The Applicant contends the forms of the original leases and deeds are in similar form for the flats. The deeds of variation extend the term of the original lease, referred to as the “Lease” and make other minor changes not relevant to this application.
8. 32 [NAME] have confirmed in writing that the agree and support the proposed variation [279-303]. There are also within the bundle letters from [RESPONDENT] confirming that they agree to the proposed variation [221 & 222]. The Applicant itself agrees to the application.
9. There are 44 interested parties (42 [NAME], 1 [RESPONDENT] and the Applicant [COMPANY]). 34 parties positively support the application for a variation. No objections have been received from any party. In excessive of 77% support the application.
10. I am satisfied that the statutory qualification requirements under section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 are met.
11. It is necessary to consider the wording of the proposed variation. The changes sought are that the window frames and glazing will no longer be the responsibility of the individual [NAME]. Responsibility for repair, maintenance and replacement will be transferred to [RESPONDENT] whose obligations currently vest in the [COMPANY]. I have carefully considered the letter from Mr [NAME]. His findings make clear that it would be to the benefit of all parties if it was the [COMPANY] and [RESPONDENT] who had this responsibility.
12. I am satisfied it is right and proper to agree the proposed variation and that the outcome may only be achieved if all the leases for the Property are so varied. I determine that the leases shall be varied upon the terms of the leases set out below and subject to the Applicant registering the same at the Land Registry.
4 _____________________________________________________
ORDER _____________________________________________________ Pursuant to Section 37 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 the Tribunal Orders that each and every Lease of [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] be varied on the terms set out in paragraph 2 below. The Applicant shall be responsible for making applications to the Land Registry to note the decision against the Freehold Titles and the Leasehold Titles of the properties as aforesaid. 1. 32 [NAME] have provided their consent to the application, as have [RESPONDENT] and the Applicant, [COMPANY]. The object to be achieved by the proposed variations cannot be achieved without varying all of the leases of the aforesaid properties. The requirements of Section 37 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 having been met, the [NAME] having been served with a copy of this application and no [NAME] having objected, the Tribunal orders that the variations set out in Paragraph 2 below shall be made to each of the Leases of the aforesaid properties.
2. The leases shall be varied as follows:
(i) Clause 2 (2)(iii)(a) to be amended so as to read: The structure of the Building including the main walls windows drains roofs foundations chimney stacks gutters and rainwater pipes
(ii) Clause 2 (2)(ix) to be amended so as to read: The cost of cleaning the exterior of the windows in the Building
(iii) Clause 5(2)(a) to be amended so as to read: The structure and in particular the main walls windows drains roofs foundations chimney stacks gutters and rainwater pipes of the building.
5
(iv) The First Schedule Part1 (a) shall be amended so as to read:
the internal plastered coverings and the plasterwork of the walls bounding the flat and the doors and door frames (other than the external surfaces of such door frames)
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Major Works Consultation Due to…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Lease Variation for Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation for Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Recognises Applicant as Qualifying Residents' Associati…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Lift Repairs Without Identifying Prejudice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal varies management order for residential property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Lease Extension Against Missing Landlord - First-tier Tribunal …
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Pathway Repair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Wins Fire Alarm Repair Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Freehold Interest Valuation
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The court allows variations to leases under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 if it serves the interest of justice and all parties agree.
- Dispensation from consultation requirements is granted when the works are deemed necessary, urgent, and do not cause prejudice to lessees.
- Acknowledgment from a site owner can establish a residents' association as a qualifying entity for a protected site.
- The Tribunal can vary management orders under section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
- Under the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, a tenant can extend their lease even if the landlord cannot be traced.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- There are no clear losing factors among the provided cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the property management company to take over responsibility for repairing and maintaining windows from the leaseholders.
Who was involved?
The property management company, leaseholders, and the freeholder were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the property management company should handle window repairs and maintenance because it was more practical and beneficial for all parties.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that it was impractical for individual leaseholders to repair and maintain their own windows due to how they are installed and interact with the building's cladding.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the property management company.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might be able to vary their leases to transfer window maintenance responsibilities if they meet the statutory qualifications.
What evidence or documents mattered?
A report from a chartered building surveyor and statements from the managing agent were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving lease variations.
