First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Disrepair
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the rent for a tenant due to disrepair and the lack of certain amenities in the property. The decision took into account the impact of the pandemic on rental values.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment considering the property's condition and market trends.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined a reduced rent due to disrepair and lack of amenities.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal assessed a rent reduction for a tenant due to disrepair and the absence of certain amenities, taking into account the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rental values.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BC/MNR/2020/0027
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 32 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 46 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1120 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 September 2021
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 5 November 2010
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Ss11 and 12 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises Mid terrace house with 3 bedrooms, 1 reception room Kitchen, bathroom/WC
Chairman A [NAME] of Decision 29 September 2021
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :
LON/00BC/MNR/2020/0027
HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : 32 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : None Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 29 September 2021 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 29 September 2021
DECISION
2
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to- face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents that I was referred to are the notice of increase, the [NAME] and covering correspondence and submissions from the Tenant the contents of which the tribunal have noted Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1120.00 (one thousand one hundred and twenty pounds) per calendar month. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice by the landlord proposing a rent increase to £1450.00 per month. Background 2. On 13 January 2020 the landlord served a notice of rent increase proposing a new rent of £1450.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £900.00 per month. The starting date for the new rent would be 5 March 2020.
3. On 25 February 2020 the tenant, Ms [APPELLANT], made an [NAME] to this tribunal challenging the increase. The [NAME] contained details disrepair at the property and correspondence with the Local Authority.
4. The tribunal has received no representations from the landlord.
5. An inspection was not possible on this occasion and the tribunal relied on the evidence provided. There was no appearance by the landlord. The property 6. The subject property is a 2 storey mid terrace house with 3 bedrooms, reception room, kitchen and bathroom/WC. The Tenant’s evidence
3 7. The tenant’s evidence includes details of disrepair including water damage and cracks. in the walls and ceiling. This is supported by a letter dated 25 February 2020 from the Council identifying category 1 and category 2 hazards which required repair. There is correspondence with the Landlords agent regarding repairs which the Tenant says were not completed 8. The kitchen requires work as a consequence of the disrepair. Correspondence indicates a new cooker was to be provided by the Landlord but all the other white goods belong to the tenant.
9. The tenant carried out works in 2010 at the start of the tenancy.
10. No details of comparable properties were provided by either party.
11. A copy of an unsigned tenancy agreement for a term commencing in December 2020 was also provided. There is no evidence this has come into effect.
The landlord’s evidence 12. The landlord has supplied no evidence. The Law 13. The tribunal must first determine that the landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.
14. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
15. In so doing the tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Any improvements made during the previous regulated tenancy are no longer disregarded. Valuation 16. No rental evidence had been put forward by the landlord.
4 17. The tribunal considered the evidence provided and also used its own knowledge and experience. The tribunal is of the view that rents have fallen in this area in the recent past primarily due to the effects of Covid 19. The tribunal considers that the house in good repair and with the amenities required by the market would let at a rent of £1400 per calendar month. The tribunal then deducted 20 % for the condition of the property and lack of white goods in the kitchen. The tribunal determines a rent of £1120 per month.
Effective date 18. Under s14 (7) of the Housing Act 1988 the effective date of the decision would normally be the date shown on the [NAME] unless there is hardship to the tenant.
19. The tribunal [NAME] shows the tenant to be in receipt of Housing Benefit which is not normally backdated. The tribunal considers this is evidence of hardship and therefore the effective date of the decision is the date of the decision.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 29 September 2021
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
5 If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Tenant's Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £950 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Battersea Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property Based on Condition and Financi…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment considering the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment that also considers local market conditions.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects current market conditions, including economic impacts.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for the condition and amenities provided.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent was reduced to £1120 per month due to disrepair and the lack of certain amenities.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in a dispute over rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the rent based on the poor condition of the property and the impact of the pandemic on rental values.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the impact of the pandemic on rental values.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the impact of external factors like the pandemic when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of disrepair and correspondence with the local authority were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
