Market Rent Determination for Tenant's Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a tenant's property, considering the impact of the pandemic. The tribunal set the rent at £1800 per month, effective from November 1, 2020.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the current market conditions, including the effects of the pandemic.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar property under the same conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the market rent for a tenant's property, considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a tenant's property, taking into account the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rental values. The tribunal decided on a rent of £1800 per month, effective from November 1, 2020.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AG/MNR/2021/0004
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Flat 3 (2nd floor), 78 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 1st Floor, Citygate, St. [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ £1800 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 November 2020
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 8 August 2009
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Ss11 & 12 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises Second floor flat consisting of 4 rooms kitchen and bathroom with central heating. Tenant owns the white goods and refitted the bathroom
[NAME] of Decision 17 August 2021
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :
LON/00AG/MNR/2021/0004 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : None Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 28 June 2021 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 28 June 2021
DECISION
2
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to- face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents that I was referred to are the notice of increase, the [NAME] and covering correspondence and submissions from the Tenant the contents of which the tribunal have noted Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1850.00 (one thousand eight hundred and fifty pounds) per calendar month. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice by the landlord proposing a rent increase to ££2100.00 per month. Background 2. On 22 September 2020 the landlord served a notice of rent increase proposing a new rent of £2100.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £2060.00 per month. The starting date for the new rent would be 1 November 2020.
3. On 29 September 2020 the tenant, Ms [APPELLANT], made an [NAME] to this tribunal challenging the increase. The [NAME] contained details of 3 comparable properties, articles on the state of the property market and a description of disrepair at the property.
4. The tribunal has received no representations from the landlord.
5. An inspection was not possible on this occasion and the tribunal relied on the evidence provided and the previous decision which was in evidence. There was no appearance by the landlord. The property 6. The subject property is a 2nd floor converted flat with accommodation consisting of 4 rooms kitchen and bathroom. The flat has central heating but there is no lift block.
3 The Tenant’s evidence 7. The tenant’s evidence includes details of disrepair including water damage from roof leaks and cracks in the walls and ceiling. There is also a rotten wooden window frame and various cracks in plasterwork.
8. The kitchen was refitted by the landlord in 2014 but all the white goods belong to the tenant.
9. The bathroom was refitted by the tenant.
10. The flat is centrally heated by a gas boiler, installed by the landlord in 2013.
11. Details of 3 comparable properties are included. Firstly, a 1st floor flat in [ADDRESS] consisting of 2 double bedrooms and a bathroom and separate shower room, reception room and kitchen. The flat has a rear roof terrace. The flat was available to let at a rent of £1625 per month 12. The 2nd comparable is also in [ADDRESS] and is a 1st floor converted flat in a double fronted house. The flat has 2 double bedrooms and 2 bathrooms (one ensuite) and a fully fitted kitchen. The flat was available part furnished at a rental of £1928.33 per month.
13. Finally, a newly refurbished second-floor flat in the next road, [ADDRESS], consisting of 2 double bedrooms 2 bathrooms and a fully equipped kitchen. The property was available to let at £2015 per month.
14. The tenant is also provided details of 2 press articles which set out the view that rental values in central London have fallen due to the effects of the pandemic.
The landlord’s evidence 15. The landlord has supplied no evidence. The Law 16. The tribunal must first determine that the landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.
4 17. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
18. In so doing the tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Any improvements made during the previous regulated tenancy are no longer disregarded. Valuation 19. No rental evidence had been put forward by the landlord.
20. The tribunal considered the evidence provided and also used its own knowledge and experience. The tribunal is of the view that rents have fallen in this area in the recent past primarily due to the effects of Covid 19. The tribunal considers that the flat in good repair and with the amenities required by the market would let at a rent of £2000 per calendar month. The tribunal then deducted 10 % for the condition of the property and lack of white goods in the kitchen. The tribunal determines a rent of £1800 per month.
Effective date 21. Under s14 (7) of the Housing Act 1988 the effective date of the decision would normally be the date shown on the [NAME] unless there is hardship to the tenant. 22. The tribunal received no evidence of hardship and therefore the effective date of the decision is 1 November 2020.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 17 August 2021
5 Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1100 After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Four-Bedroom Property Under Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Tenancy Dispute
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects current market conditions.
- The tribunal must consider the property's condition and amenities when setting rent.
- The rent should be based on comparable properties in the same area.
- The Housing Act 1988 is used to determine the fair market rent.
- The effects of the pandemic are taken into account for rent determination.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set the market rent for a tenant's property at £1800 per month, effective from November 1, 2020.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the evidence provided, including the condition of the property and comparable rental prices in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the impact of the pandemic on rental values in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than what the landlord proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the current market conditions and the impact of external factors like the pandemic.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition, comparable rental prices, and articles on the state of the property market were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
