Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1100 After Considering Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent for a tenant's property from £1850 to £1100 per month after inspecting the property and considering its condition and need for modernisation.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination based on the property's condition and amenities.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the property's condition and amenities, considering the property as if it were being let by a willing landlord in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and amenities.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the proposed rent from £1850 to £1100 per month after considering the property's condition and amenities. The Tribunal inspected the property and took into account the condition and need for modernisation.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0395
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 39B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 1st Floor, Citygate, St. [ADDRESS], Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1100 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 23 February 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 December 2022
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises Ground floor converted flat, 4 rooms kitchen bath/wc
[NAME] of Decision 23 February 2024
Case Reference
: LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0395
Property : 39B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Miss [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 10 October 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] [NAME]
Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 23 February 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1100 per calendar month/week with effect from 23 February 2024. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On 27 September 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1850 in place of the existing rent of ££822.50 per month to take effect from 20 November 2023.
2. On 10 October 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 12 October 2023.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 23 February 2024
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.
5. The Tenancy is an assured periodic tenancy by succession in December 2022. The tenant gave evidence of works of improvement carried out by her late father during the previous regulated tenancy. However works of improvement carried out during a previous statutory tenancy are not disregarded for the purposes of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 and the tribunal therefore takes into account the condition of the property as it saw it.
6. The flat is in generally good internal decorative order and has been well maintained by the tenant. However the kitchen is cramped and dated, and the bathroom is now also of dated appearance. External decorations are poor and some of the window frames are showing signs of wet rot.
7. Carpets curtains and white goods were provided by the tenant.
Determination and Valuation
8. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £1575.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
The condition of the property and need for modernisation and the lack of carpets curtains and white goods
PCM AST Market rent 1,575.00 £ less condition/terms 30.0% 472.50 -£ 1,102.50 £ Rounded to 1,100.00 £
9. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1100.00 per calendar month.
Decision
10. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1100.00 per calendar month/week.
11. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1100.00 is to take effect on 23 February 2024. The tenant is in receipt of benefits and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: [NAME]: 23 February 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Tenant's Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant's request for a market rent determination was accepted by the Tribunal.
- The Tribunal considered the property's condition as it saw it, including improvements made during a previous tenancy.
- The property's dated kitchen and bathroom, and poor external decorations, reduced its market rent value.
- The lack of carpets, curtains, and white goods provided by the landlord reduced the market rent.
- The Tribunal set a later effective date for the new rent to prevent undue hardship for the tenant, who receives benefits.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £1850 per month was not accepted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1850 to £1100 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent after inspecting the property and considering its condition and need for modernisation.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition and need for modernisation of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to challenge a proposed rent increase if the property's condition justifies a lower rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the condition of the property and the need for modernisation.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
