First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £145 per Week
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property, setting it at £145 per week. They took into consideration the condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for the condition and improvements made by the tenant.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering various factors such as the condition of the property and any improvements made by the tenant. Importantly, certain effects on the rent, like those due to improvements made by the tenant, are disregarded when determining the open-market rent.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the market rent for a property at £145 per week, considering various factors including the condition of the property and improvements made by the tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a property at £145 per week, taking into account the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant, under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference : CAM/38UF/MNR/2022/0008
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 11 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent : [redacted] : 14 February 2022
Type of [NAME] : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME]
Mr [NAME] and venue of : 25 April 2022 Determination
remote hearing on the papers.
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
The market rent as at 4 April 2022 is £145 per week.
This has been a remote hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in a bundle, the contents of which have been noted. The order made is described below.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT S E C FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background
1. On 14 February 2022, the tenant referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2. The landlord's notice, which was dated 7 February 2022 proposed a rent of £91.51 per week with effect from 4 April 2022 in place of the existing rent of £87.91 per week.
3. The tenancy is an assured tenancy which commenced on 11 June 2007.
4. Directions were issued by the tribunal on 2 March 2022.
5. The parties did not object to the matter being dealt with on the papers and both made written representations to the tribunal.
The Evidence
6. The tenant stated that the flat is in a block of four flats, accessed by a communal entrance hall and staircase. The accommodation comprises two rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc, it is centrally heated and the windows are double glazed. The kitchen and bathroom are dated, the wc has a high level cistern. The tenant added that there is black mould in the bedroom, bathroom and on the landing outside the bathroom, photographs were provided showing the common parts and interior of the flat. He stated that the landlord had been due to inspect the bathroom on 18 March 2020 however the inspection had been cancelled due to [NAME] and had not been carried out to date. The kitchen is very small. He had supplied the carpets, curtains and white goods.
7. The landlord stated that based on asking rents on Rightmove the open market rental value of the flat is £780 per month (£180 per week). The proposed rent is less than would be charged to a new tenant. The flat is a good size having a floor area of approximately 53 sq metres. The law
8. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy.
9. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.
3
Valuation
10. In coming to its decision, the Tribunal had regard to the evidence supplied by both the landlord and the tenant. The comparables were superior in terms of modernisation to the subject premises and generally benefited from white goods, floor coverings and blinds or curtains. The common parts of the block were spartan.
11. The Tribunal concluded that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market would be £170 per week. The open market assumes that the flat is in the condition usually found in open market lettings. However, in this instance the kitchen and bathroom are dated, there are significant areas of mould and the common parts are very basic. The carpets, curtains and white goods had been provided by the tenant. The Tribunal determined that a deduction of £25 should be made from the weekly open market rent to reflect these matters.
The decision
12. The Tribunal determines the open market rental value of the flat as at 4 April 2022 is £145 per week. The rent payable may not exceed this figure however it does not prevent the landlord from charging a lower amount in accordance with the Notice of Increase dated 7 February 2022.
Chairman: [NAME]: 9 May 2022
__________________________________
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
iii. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4
iv. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
Appendix Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent by rent assessment [NAME]. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment [NAME] a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the [NAME] shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [NAME] consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d )in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
5 (3)For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.
6
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Rural Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for a Leased Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Ground-Floor Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Room in Multiple Occupation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Listed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property in Chelmsford
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Assured Tenancy Rent at £450 per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for the condition and improvements made by the tenant.
- The rent determination must consider the condition and amenities of the property.
- The market rent should reflect current market conditions and be reasonable for a willing landlord.
- The rent should be set at a value that considers comparable properties in the area.
- The rent determination should reflect the open market value of the property, adjusted for the condition and terms of the tenancy.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified as leading against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for the property was set at £145 per week.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the evidence presented by both parties and the requirements of the Housing Act 1988.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant were crucial arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should present evidence regarding the condition of the property and any improvements they have made.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and written statements from both the tenant and the landlord mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
