First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1550
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £1550 per month for a property in Luton, considering its features and local rental values. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property based on its condition and local rental values.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property based on its condition and local rental values.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a market rent of £1550 per month for a property in Luton, considering its features and location.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1550 per calendar month for a property in Luton, considering its features and local rental values. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/00KA/MNR/2023/0125 Property : 20 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Akhter Respondent: [redacted]
[COMPANY] of [NAME] : Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Determination of market rent payable. Tribunal member(s)
:
Tribunal Judge Bernadette MacQueen Tribunal Member [NAME], FRICS
Date of decision : 20th November 2023
DECISION
Decision: 1. The Tribunal determined a rent of £1550 per calendar month to take effect from 3rd October 2023.
Reasons Background 2. The Landlord by a notice in the prescribed form dated 22nd May 2023 proposed a new rent of £1750 per calendar month to be effective from 3rd October 2023. On 14th September 2023 the tenant referred the
2 Notice to the Tribunal. This was in lieu of the previous rent of £1400 per calendar month.
3. Parties were requested to complete a pro forma supplying detail of the accommodation on a room-by-room basis, the features of the property (central heating, white goods, double glazing, carpets and curtains) and other property attributes and any further comments that they may wish the tribunal to take into consideration. This could include any repairs and improvements that had been made, any comments on the condition of the property.
4. They were invited to include photographs and provide details of any rents for similar properties that they wished to rely on.
5. The determination would take place based on the written submissions from both parties unless either party requested an inspection of the property or a hearing. A reply form was submitted by the landlord. Parties have not requested a hearing.
The Property 6. The property is a three-bedroom semi-detached house of brick construction, with a tiled roof, bay window, central heating and double- glazed windows and door.
7. The accommodation comprises two living rooms, kitchen, three bedrooms, a first-floor bathroom and a downstairs toilet and wash basin. On the landlord’s reply form dated 13th October 2023 a fourth bedroom measuring 5 foot by 9 foot is identified. However, given the size of this room, the Tribunal has not included this as a bedroom.
8. The double glazing and central hearing has been provided by the landlord.
9. There is a garden and off-street parking. The Tenancy 10. The tenancy commenced on 16 September 2022 and a copy of an assured shorthold tenancy agreement dated 16 September 2022 was provided. The tenancy term was for an initial period of 12 months at £1400 per calendar month and a statutory tenancy on the terms of the written agreement appears to have arisen from 16 September 2022. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies in respect of Landlord’s repairing obligations. The Law
11. By virtue of section 14 (1) Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal is to determine a rent at which the dwelling-house concerned might
3 reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured periodic tenancy- (a) having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the subject tenancy
12. By virtue of section 14 (2) Housing Act 1988 in [NAME] a determination the Tribunal shall disregard – (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME]; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14(3) Housing Act 1988) carried out by a tenant otherwise than as an obligation; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house due to the failure of the tenant to comply with any terms of the subject tenancy.
Representation – Tenant
13. The tribunal has not received any written representations from the tenant. The [NAME] form completed by the tenant confirmed the details of the accommodation and features of the property.
Representations – Landlord
14. The landlord completed the Reply Form and confirmed that the carpets, curtains and white goods were provided by the landlord. 15. Rentals for similar properties (comparables), were not provided by either party.
Determination
16. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality in particular. It does not take into account the present rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the existing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal cannot take into account the personal circumstances of either the landlord or the tenant.
17. The Tribunal assesses a rent for the Property as it is on the day of the hearing disregarding any improvements made by the tenant but taking into account the impact on rental value of disrepair (if any) which is not due to a failure of the tenant to comply with the terms of the tenancy.
4
18. The property is described at paragraphs six to nine above. 19. Neither party has provided comparables, therefore the Tribunal has had to have regard to its own knowledge and experience. It determines that the open market rent of a property in good condition for its age and type would be around £1550 per month.
20. The Tribunal then considers [NAME] any deduction to reflect the condition of the property and any improvements made by the tenant. The Tribunal has not been provided with any information to justify any deduction being made.
21. The Tribunal therefore arrives at the figure of £1550 per calendar month for rent for the property commencing 3rd October 2023.
Tribunal Judge Bernadette MacQueen
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
5
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Based on Condition and Lo…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Considering Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant's Accommodation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Small Rural Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent Based on Comparable Properties
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition is considered when setting the rent.
- Local rental values are used to determine fair market rent.
- Comparable properties in the area are used to set the rent.
- Disrepair of the property is taken into account when adjusting the rent.
- Amenities of the property are factored into the calculation of the fair market rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a market rent of £1550 per month for a property in Luton.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's features and local rental values, as required by the Housing Act 1988.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's features and local rental values.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the local rental values and the features of their property when determining a fair market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property's features were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
