Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Small Rural Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reviewed a notice of rent increase and set a fair market rent of £675 per month, taking into account the property's condition and local comparables.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, taking into account the property's condition and local rental rates.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent increase. The notice must specify a new period starting at least two months after the notice's service date. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased, further increases can be proposed after specific timeframes, such as one year for agricultural occupancies or 52 weeks for other cases.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the tenancy began. The tribunal then determines the open-market rent based on various factors including the periods of the tenancy and the terms of the agreement.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal reviewed the proposed rent increase and determined a fair market rent based on the property's condition and local comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal reviewed a notice of rent increase and determined a fair market rent of £675 per month, considering the property's condition and local comparables.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CAM/00JH/MNR/2024/0612 Property : 106 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : None Respondent : [redacted] Representative :
None
Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members :
[NAME] and venue of Hearing (Papers only) : 6 January 2025 First Tier Tribunal (Eastern) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 6 January 2025
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application dated 21 October 2024 from the [APPELLANT] of the Property, regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 The notice, dated 1 October 2024, proposed a new rent of £675 per calendar month, with effect from and including 1 December 2024. The passing rent was said to be £595 per calendar month.
2 3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the last tenancy agreement was not provided. It was said to have begun in 1978 and remained an oral tenancy.
4 Directions were issued 23 October 2024 by Legal [NAME]. Neither party requested a hearing. The Tribunal does not routinely carry out inspections.
5 The Tribunal received an initial application. The Tribunal sent out its standard Reply Form to both landlord and [APPELLANT].
6 The Tribunal carefully considered and noted such representations as it received from both parties regarding the location layout size and condition of the Property and other available and let comparable properties in the location if supplied. The [APPELLANT] provided measurements of the rooms.
Property
7 The Property was viewed externally using Google Streetview (data capture March 2023). It is a small two bedroom, two level house in a short terrace of similar houses built in the mid Nineteenth Century. The front exterior finish of the walls remains stone. The roof is double pitched, traditional slate. There have been some reported minor leaks from the roof. The Property appears to be in fair condition externally.
8 The house directly fronts the pavement onto the street in the rural village of Kings Cliffe. There is said to be a small rear yard and garden and access way shared with neighbouring houses. Accommodation includes two small double bedrooms and small bathroom/wc to the first floor; and a living room and small kitchen to the ground floor. From the tenants measurements the gross internal floor area is approximately 50m2. For a two bedroom house, that is small. There is a small rear covered area to the rear. There was no off road parking to the front but also no apparent on street parking restrictions.
9 The landlord provided partial coal fired central heating and hot water. The windows are all single glazed save for the double glazed bathroom window. The [APPELLANT] has replaced the kitchen three times since the start of the tenancy and the bathroom, twice. Carpets, curtains and white goods are all provided by the [APPELLANT].
10 Neither party referred the Tribunal to rents sought and/or obtained in comparable properties locally at or around the valuation date. The Tribunal is grateful to the parties for the completed Reply Forms.
Law
11 In accordance with the terms of S14 of the Housing Act 1988 we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord,
3 under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to [APPELLANT]’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the [APPELLANT]’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the Property falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that the Property to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
Decision
12 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in and around Kings Cliffe and surrounding rural villages, it determines that the subject Property would let on a normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £975 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order. However it makes allowance for the various shortcomings. It assumes the most basic functional bathroom and kitchen dating from 1978, the lack of carpets curtains and white goods, the virtual absence of double glazing and the limited partial coal fired central heating system. For these various limitations it makes a deduction of £300 pcm. The market rent is therefore determined at £675 pcm.
13 The new rent will take effect from and including 1 December 2024, the effective start date given in the landlord’s Notice. The Landlord is not obliged but, may charge a rent up to though not in excess of, £675 pcm.
Name: N. [NAME]: 6 January 2025
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
4 The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for New Flat in High Wycombe
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Considering Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced for Tenant Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent that reflects the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the property's condition and market comparables under the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value of the property, adjusted for its condition and amenities.
- A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, taking into account the condition of the property and comparable rental prices in the area.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of the property, considering its condition and amenities.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the condition of the property and local rental values.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal decided on a fair market rent of £675 per month for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental rates, ensuring a fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied to determine the fair market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the availability of comparable rentals in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair market rent based on the property's condition and local comparables.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local rental rates when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Measurements of the rooms, descriptions of the property's condition, and information on comparable properties in the area were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving disputes over rent increases.
