Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Considering Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair market rent for a property, considering its condition and local rental values. The rent was set at £1,890 per calendar month, effective from 7 December 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for its condition and local rental values.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property considering its condition and local rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair market rent for a property, taking into account its condition and local rental values, under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £1,890 per calendar month, effective from 7 December 2024.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AS/MNR/2025/0620
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 101 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT] [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,890 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 7 December 2024
3. The amount included for services is
not applicable N/A Per
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 7 September 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period 24 months
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord responsible
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord White goods.
9. Description of premises Single storey detached bungalow comprising three bedrooms, sitting room, kitchen and bathroom.
[NAME] of Decision 20 May 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AS/MNR/2025/0620
Property : 101 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenants
: Miss [RESPONDENT]
Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 3 December 2024
Type of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME]
Mr [NAME] of Reasons : 20th May 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,890 per calendar month with effect from 7 December 2024. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 Background
1. On 27 September 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,200 in place of the existing rent of £1,650 per calendar month to take effect from 07 December 2024.
2. On 3 December 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 3 December 2024.
3. Directions were issued on 7 February 2025 by the Tribunal.
4. The parties were invited to submit any relevant information and submissions. The Tenant and the Landlord each submitted a completed reply form and additional evidence to support their respective case.
Submissions
5. The Tenant provided photos and details of current maintenance issues at the property including damp and mould, a leaking toilet, cracked floor tiles in the hall, defective external doors in the kitchen and sitting room and garage.
6. In her completed reply form the Tenant initially requested a hearing and inspection and that she was content for a paper-based determination. When queried the Tenant confirmed via email that she was content for a paper based determination and did not require a hearing but requested an inspection.
7. In the Landlord’s submission, he stated that the Tenant has not provided access for routine maintenance and that the Tenant has also failed to take reasonable care of the property and has not maintained the gardens at the property.
8. The Landlord also refers to rent arrears and smoking taking place inside the property which is prohibited under the tenancy agreement.
9. The Landlord states in his submissions that the proposed rent of £2,200 is lower than inflation and provided a summary of six properties along with links to the listings of these properties on Zoopla or Rightmove. Unfortunately most of the links had expired, presumably because the properties had been let but we are grateful to the Landlord for taking the time to provide the information.
10. The asking rents range from £2,100 to £2,500 per calendar month for five of the properties listed by the Landlord in his submissions but the actual rents achieved for these properties are not known. The sixth property had an asking rent of £3,500 but this listing had expired.
3
The Inspection
11. The Tribunal inspected the property on 25 April 2025. The Landlord, Mr [RESPONDENT], and Mrs [RESPONDENT] were waiting outside the property with their letting agent. Mr [APPELLANT] stated that he wished to inspect the property. The Tenant was not willing to allow the Landlord to enter the property so it was agreed by all parties that the Landlord’s letting agent would accompany the tribunal on the inspection instead. The Tenant’s father Mr [APPELLANT] was also in attendance at the inspection.
12. The property is a single storey detached bungalow comprising three bedrooms, sitting room, kitchen and bathroom. The property benefits from central heating and double glazing. Externally there is a detached garage and front and rear gardens.
13. There are a number of outstanding maintenance issues which were evident as part of the inspection. It was noted that the ceramic floor tiles in the entrance hall are uneven and cracked and present a trip hazard. There is a leaking toilet and there is also mould present in the main bedroom.
14. There was no internal door to the living room present and the tenant stated within her submissions that the kitchen door cannot be used due to a broken mechanism and the sitting room external door to the rear opens, but cannot be locked. The main door to the garage is not operational but there is a side entrance door to access the garage.
15. Externally, missing and defective roof tiles were noted to the main house and the garage.
The Law
16. The rules governing a determination of market rent are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the tribunal is to determine the rent for which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration.
Determination and Valuation
17. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let on the determination date in the condition
4 that is considered usual for such an open market letting. The Tribunal considered the value of the property in light of its local knowledge and experience with regard to the submissions of the Landlord and Tenant.
18. Having consideration of the evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the subject property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2,100 per calendar month.
19. This hypothetical rent is adjusted as necessary to allow for the differences between the terms and conditions considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the date of the determination.
20. An adjustment of 10% was made to account for the current condition of the property and outstanding maintenance issues relating to the defective doors, flooring, roof covering and mould.
21. The valuation can be summarised as follows:
per calendar month Market Rent
£2,100
Less Condition
Approx.10 %
£210
£1,890
Decision
22. The Tribunal determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,890 per calendar month.
23. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,890 per calendar month to take effect on 7 December 2024; this being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 20 May 2025
5 Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Case: Property Condition and Financial Hardship Considered
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Small Rural Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Small Bungalow
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy Dispute
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent considering local rental values.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for property improvements.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent taking into account property amenities.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the property's condition and local rental standards.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the market rent for a property at £1,890 per calendar month, effective from 7 December 2024.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental values, ensuring a fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and local rental values were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair market rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local rental values when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photos and details of the property's condition were important, as well as local rental values.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
