VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £3000 per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £3000 per month for a property, ignoring the current rent and personal circumstances of the parties, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent determined under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988, regardless of the current rent charged.

Topics

market rent determinationHousing Act 1988

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding those that are relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve notices proposing increases in rent, with specific timing requirements for when these increases can take effect.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property without considering personal circumstances of the parties.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a market rent of £3000 per month for a property under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988, disregarding the current rent and personal circumstances of the parties.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference : LON/OOAP/MNR/2024/0063

Property : 79 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenants : [APPELLANT], [COUNSEL] [NAME].

Representative : In Person

Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] : In Person

Type of application : Determination of a Market Rent

Sections 13 & 14 Housing Act 1988

Tribunal member(s) : [NAME] of determination : 28 August 2024

Date of reasons : 28 August 2024

REASONS

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

Decision of the Tribunal

On 28 August 2024 the Tribunal determined a Market Rent of £3000.00 per month to take effect from 28 February 2024. It should be noted that the amount determined represents the market rent determined under section 13, the landlord may choose to charge less.

Background

1. The property 79 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is a multi-occupied house, there are five tenants in the house each with their own room. The tenants moved into the property at different times. No tenant has a formal tenancy agreement.

2. Summary of the individual tenants' positions from their five application forms.

Applicant Individual rent Date moved in [NAME] £326.00 28 January 2023 [NAME] £626.00 28 October 2023 [NAME] £326.00 28 January 2023 [NAME] No details “November 2022” [NAME] No details Pre 28 October 2023

3. The Notice of Increase of Rent dated 12 January 2024 proposed a new rent of £3000.00 per month to take effect on 28 February 2024 in lieu of a passing rent of £2500.00 per month.

4. The tribunal has not received any tenancy agreements of either individual rooms or of the collective whole property.

5. On 3 July 2024, the Tribunal issued Directions advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on the papers unless either party objected, in writing, within 7 days. In accordance with current Tribunal policy the parties were advised that no inspection would be undertaken. No objections were received to determination on papers were received. No inspection was requested.

6. The Directions required the Landlord and Tenant to submit their completed statements to the Tribunal by 24 July 2024 and 7 August 2024 respectively, with copies to be sent to the other party. Both parties complied.

7. These reasons address the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each point referred to in submissions but concentrate on those issues which, in the Tribunal’s view, are fundamental to the determination.

Law

3

8. In accordance with the terms of Section 14 of the Act, the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a willing Landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy.

4

9. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenants’ improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenants’ failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

The Property

10. The Tribunal did not inspect the property. From the application forms the property is a terraced house comprising one living room, five bedrooms, one kitchen, a WC and a bathroom. There is also an overgrown garden.

11. There are no details relating to Houses in Multiple Occupation Licenses.

Submission – Tenants

12. The application of [NAME] dated 10-2-2024 notes a report from Haringey Council detailing outstanding repairs to be done.

13. The application of [NAME] dated 6 February 2024 notes the garden of the property is overgrown and that on taking occupation, their room was furnished by a bed and some drawers.

14. The application of [NAME] dated 10 February 2024 repeats the submissions of the earlier two Application Forms.

15. The application of [NAME] [NAME] dated 4 June 2024 notes occupancy since October 2022.

16. The application of [NAME] was received on the 12 April 2024.

Submissions- Landlord

17. The Landlord made no submissions.

The Determination

18. The Tribunal notes that the five tenants were in place at the time of the previous Notice of Increase in Rent and remain the same at the subject Notice of Increase in Rent.

19. The Tribunal finds there is one tenancy, albeit in the absence of a tenancy agreement. The Tribunal joins the applications together into one which seeks to challenge the level of rent in the Notice.

20. The Tribunal has carefully considered all the submissions before it.

21. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and, in particular, to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality. The Tribunal has no regard to the current rent and the period of time for which that rent has been charged, nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the passing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal is unable to account for the personal circumstances of either the Landlord or the Tenant.

22. The date the Tribunal assesses the rent is the effective date in the Landlord’s Notice, which is the 28 February 2024. The Tribunal disregards any

5

improvements made by the Tenants but considers the impact on rental value of disrepair, due to the Tenant's failure to comply with the tenancy terms or the Landlord's failure to repair.

23. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market, if it were let on the effective date and in the condition that is considered usual for such a market let. The Tribunal finds this to be £3200.00 per month.

24. The Tribunal notes from the Tenants submissions that the garden is overgrown and the shed in poor condition. The Tribunal makes an adjustment of £200 per month to £3000.00 per month.

25. The Tenants made no substantive submissions to the Tribunal about delaying the effective date of the revised rent due to undue hardship under section 14(7) of the Act. Accordingly, the rent of £3000.00 per month will take effect from 28 February 2024.

26. The Tribunal makes no finding regarding the apportionment of the whole property's rent in terms of individual rooms.

[NAME]: 13 September 2024

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

6

If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determines the market rent based on comparable rental values in the locality.
  • The Tribunal ignores personal circumstances of the parties when determining the market rent.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured tenancy.
  • The Tribunal sets the market rent based on the reasonable expectation of a willing landlord.
  • A tenant is entitled to a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The Tribunal dismisses the claim if the market rent determination does not consider the condition and location of the property.
  • The Tribunal dismisses the claim if the market rent determination is based solely on the condition of the property without considering comparable rental values.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided a market rent of £3000 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenants and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, focusing on the market rent without considering personal circumstances.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the market rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might expect a fair market rent determination based on the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence and documents related to the property's condition and comparable rental values mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.