First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy after reviewing written evidence from both parties. The tribunal considered comparable rental values but also took into account the property's condition, reducing the proposed rent by £75 due to dated fittings and mould/damp.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord's proposed increase in rent must be assessed by a tribunal considering the property's condition and comparable rental values.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on the property's condition and comparable rental values. The determination considers the property as a periodic tenancy with the same periods as the original tenancy, starting at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice. Additionally, the tribunal disregards certain factors such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in the property's value due to improvements made by the tenant, and reductions in value due to the tenant's non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions without holding an oral hearing.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions and comparable rental values, adjusting for property condition. The tribunal found that a deduction of £75 was appropriate due to the dated condition and mould/damp.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HB/MNR/2023/0173
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 58C [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 925.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21 July 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 21 December 2019
5. Length of the term or rental period Six months
6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises A converted ground floor flat forming part of a two storey building with one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom/wc and private rear garden.
[NAME] of Decision 25 October 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HB/MNR/2023/0173 Property : 58C [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : [COUNSEL] & [NAME] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
25th October 2023
DECISION
2
Summary of Decision 1. On the 25th October 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £925 per month to take effect from 21st July 2023. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On the 19th June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,000 per month in place of the existing rent of £825 per month to take effect from 21st July 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On the 5th July 2023 the tenant appealed to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 29th August 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos. A further set of directions were prepared on the 21st September 2023.
7. The Tribunal received representations from each party and the rent appeal statements were completed.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on the 25th October 2023 based on the limited documents received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on Rightmove and Google maps, the property comprises a converted ground floor flat forming part of a two-storey semi detached building evidently built during the 1950s with rendered elevations under a pitched and tiled roof. The accommodation comprises one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom/WC. There is a private rear garden which is paved. The property is located in an established residential area close to local amenities.
3 10. There is gas central heating, double glazed windows. Carpets, curtains and white goods were provided at the commencement of the tenancy. The tenant has confirmed the curtains have been subsequently changed by them.
Submissions 11. The current assured shorthold tenancy agreement was provided which commenced on the 21st December 2019 for a period of 6 months at a monthly rental figure of £750.
12. As previously mentioned, the parties completed the Rent Appeal Statements together with photographic evidence and floor plan.
13. The landlord provided comparable evidence of two purpose built flats, although, it is stated 6 comparables were attached. The Tribunal was only able to place limited weight on the evidence as these are purpose built flats in modern blocks and there is no confirmation of whether these properties have been let and if so, the agreed value.
14. The Energy Performance Rating for the property confirms an energy rating of C76, above average and it is confirmed the floor area is 46m2. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;
4 (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation 15. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
16. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Landlord and Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
17. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Bristol area, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,000 per month.
5 18. However, the property is not let in such a condition as would command this full rent and the Tribunal needs to make some adjustment to this full rent to allow for the dated condition of the fittings and mould.
19. The Tribunal has considered very carefully each parties submissions and using its own expertise, considers that a deduction of £75 is appropriate in order to take account of the general lack of refurbishment and the mould/damp. This reduces the rental figure to £925 per month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
20. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 21. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £925 per month.
22. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £925 per month should take effect from 21st July 2023, this being the date specified in the Notice.
[NAME] 25th October 2023
6
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Assured Tenancy Rent Based on Written Submissions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Value for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1800 per Month for Assured Tenancy…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate After Written Submissions
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a market rent of £925 per month for the property.
- The landlord's notice proposing a new rent of £1,000 per month was legally compliant.
- The property's dated condition, including fittings and mould, justified a reduction in the full market rent.
- A deduction of £75 was appropriate due to the general lack of refurbishment and the presence of mould/damp.
- The new rent of £925 per month was to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set a new market rent of £925 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A landlord proposed to increase the rent, and the tenant appealed to the tribunal.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal reviewed written submissions from both parties and determined that a new market rent of £925 per month was appropriate after considering property condition and comparable rental values.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was the primary law used to determine the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tribunal's decision was influenced by evidence of property condition and comparable rental values in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The tenant lost as the new rent was set higher than their initial objection but lower than the landlord's proposed amount.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can appeal to the tribunal, which will consider written evidence and comparable rental values.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property condition and rent comparison data were important in making the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
