VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set a fair market rent for an assured tenancy after considering similar rental prices in the area and adjusting for the property's condition. The new rent is £734.93 per month starting April 1st.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market rate considering the property's condition and comparables in the area.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy based on comparable properties and adjustments for condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy based on comparable properties and adjustments for condition, setting it at £734.93 per month with effect from April 1st.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference BIR/00FY/MNR/2025/0651

[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

[NAME]

Tenant’s [ADDRESS] for [APPELLANT]

Landlord’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord’s Representative

None Date of Application 11 March 2025

Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members [NAME] – [NAME] of Decision

18 June 2026

Rent Determined

£734.93 per calendar month Date the new rent takes effect 1 April 2025

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. The Landlord served a notice dated 10 February 2025 under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £743.93 per calendar month(pcm) - including services charges of £73.85pcm - in place of the existing rent of £700.02 pcm to take effect from 1 April 2025.

2. On 11 March 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 29 November 2022. The rental period is monthly.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtains and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. Service charge of £73.85pcm

Liability for Council Tax

6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property.

7. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent

8. None.

Inspection/Hearing

9. Neither party requested an inspection or a hearing.

3

10. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

The Property

11. The Property is a second floor flat and provides the following accommodation:

Internal: Living room, kitchen, bathroom, balcony and 2 bedrooms.

Outside: Permit parking.

The Property benefits from central heating and double glazing. The Tenant provided all the carpets and curtains and white goods (excluding the cooker).

Evidence

12. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.

The Tenant

13. The Tenant submitted that there was a crack in the bathroom tile, a broken floor board which they have reported and awaiting repair.

14. No comparable evidence was submitted except reference to a neighbour on the same floor which they stated were paying less but no other details.

The Landlord

15. The Landlord submitted details of various comparable properties as follows:

Hindle House 11 Traffic St – 2 bed flat at £1,300pcm [ADDRESS] Village – 2 bed flat at £995pcm [ADDRESS] – 2 bed flat at £950pcm [ADDRESS] – 2 bed flat at £950pcm [ADDRESS] – 2 bed flat at £875pcm [ADDRESS] – 2 bed flat at £875pcm [ADDRESS] Meadows – 2 bed flat at £850pcm [ADDRESS] – 2 bed flat at £850pcm Flat A [ADDRESS] Meadows – 2 bed flat at £850pcm [ADDRESS] – 2 bed flat at £800pcm

4

Determination and Valuation

16. The Tribunal had regard to the submissions and evidence and to its own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area.

17. The Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £700pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as other properties that are offered to let in the market.

18. The Tribunals full valuation is shown below:

Starting Rent

£700.00pcm

Less Adjustments for condition

£40.00

Market rent

£660.00

Add Service Charge

£73.85

Total

£733.85 SAY

£734.93 pcm

Undue hardship

19. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of

Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of

undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to

the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

20. The Tenant did not make an application in this respect.

Decision

21. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £734.93 (including a service charge of £73.85) per calendar month with effect from 1 April 2025.

APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal

5

Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The market rent for the property, if modernized and in good order, would be around £700 per month.
  • An adjustment of £40 was made to the starting rent due to the property's condition.
  • The service charge of £73.85 per month was added to the market rent.
  • The Tribunal used its expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the rent.
  • The new rent takes effect from April 1, 2025, as specified in the landlord's notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a market rent of £734.93 per month, including service charges.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court reviewed comparable rental prices and property condition to determine a fair market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were used to set the new rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord's evidence on comparable rental prices in the area was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was neither fully for nor against, setting a fair market rate based on evidence.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing rent determination should gather comparable rental prices and property condition details.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of comparable properties and the property's current condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal to the Upper Tribunal on points of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.