VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Lease Premium at £34833

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant applied for a new lease under the Leasehold Reform Act when their landlord could not be found. The First-tier Tribunal determined that the tenant is entitled to a new lease and set the premium at £34833.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a new lease if they follow the procedure set out in sections 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Topics

leasehold reformnew lease determination

Provisions

Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s.50Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s.51Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 Sch 13

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined the premium for a new lease under section 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

📜 Headnote Official document

The tribunal determined that a tenant is entitled to a new lease under sections 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. The case involved determining the value of the new lease when the landlord was missing.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/OOAE/OCE/2022/0166 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]. Applicants : [redacted] (2)[COUNSEL] [NAME] : The [RESPONDENT] Respondent : [redacted] : NA Type of application : Section 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 Tribunal members :

Judge Shepherd Kevin Ridgeway MRICS

Date of determination and venue : at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] on the papers Date of decision : 8th August 2023

DECISION

Summary of the tribunal’s decision The appropriate premium payable for the new lease is £34833. Background

2 1. This is an application made by the applicant leaseholders pursuant to section 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (“the Act”) for a determination of the premium to be paid for the grant of a new lease of 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] (the “premises”).

2. On 25th November 2022 [NAME] at Central London County Court made an order pursuant to s. 50 of the Act to the effect that the Applicant was entitled to a new lease. The freeholder landlord is missing. The case was transferred to the Tribunal to determine the value and terms of the new lease. The property

3. The property comprises a one bedroom ground floor flat.

4. The Tribunal are familiar with the location close to Wembley Stadium. The tribunal’s determination 5. The tribunal determines that the value of the new leasehold at the date of the application was £34833 Reasons for the tribunal’s determination 6. The right to a new lease is conferred by Ch 2 of Pt 1 of the 1993 Act. By exercising the right the tenant acquires a new lease of the flat in substitution for his or her existing lease for a term expiring 90 years after the term date at a peppercorn rent ( s.56(1)). The tenant pays a premium which compensates the landlord for the loss of the remainder of the term. In the present case the landlord is missing and the procedure pursuant to ss50 and 51 of the Act has been followed.

3 7. The premium for the new lease is calculated in accordance with Sch 13, para 2 of the Act and is the aggregate of the following figures : (a) The diminution in value of the landlord’s interest in the flat; (b) The landlord’s share of the marriage value; (c) Any amount of compensation payable.

8. The calculation by [NAME] has been checked and verified by the Tribunal. The comparables are reasonable. Accordingly the Tribunal accept the valuation of £34833. The specimen lease is also acceptable.

The premium 9. The tribunal determines the appropriate premium to be £34833 Name: Judge Shepherd Date: 8th August 2023

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

4 If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

5 CASE REFERENCE LON/00AC/OLR/2014/0106

First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property)

Valuation under Schedule 13 of the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993

Premium payable for an extended leasehold Interest in [Property]

Valuation date: [Date]

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant was entitled to a new lease because the freeholder landlord was missing and the correct legal procedure was followed.
  • The tribunal accepted the valuation of £34,833 for the new lease premium.
  • The comparable properties used in the valuation were considered appropriate.
  • The proposed specimen lease was deemed acceptable by the tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal decided on the value of a new lease when the landlord was missing.

Who was involved?

A tenant applied for a new lease, and the First-tier Tribunal made the determination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court followed the procedure set out in sections 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform Act to determine the value of the new lease.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 50 and 51 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 7193 were used to guide the decision.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's right to a new lease under sections 50 and 51 of the Act was central to the case.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can apply for a new lease under the Act, even if the landlord is missing.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Valuation reports and comparable property values were key to determining the premium.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, an application for permission to appeal must be made within 28 days of receiving written reasons from the tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving leasehold reform.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.