VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £1,200 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and local market rents.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for the property's condition.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the property's condition and the open market conditions. The determination takes into account the periodic nature of the tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match the original one, except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's state.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UL/MNR/2024/0020

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 26 Barncroft, Farnham, Surrey, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME]-Gedye

1. The rent is: £ 1200.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 03 February 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 03 January 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Modern 2 bedroom terraced house.

[NAME] of Decision 4 March 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/43UL/MNR/2024/0020 Property : 26 Barncroft Farnham Surrey [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : [NAME] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

4th March 2024

DECISION

CHI/43UL/MNR/2024/0020

2 Summary of Decision 1. On 4th March 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200 per month to take effect from 3rd February 2024.

Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 12th December 2023 the [NAME] served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,225 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,125 per month to take effect from 3rd February 2024. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 22nd January 2024 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued directions on 7th February 2024 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 4th March 2024 based on the written representations received.

9. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be

CHI/43UL/MNR/2024/0020

3 expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

CHI/43UL/MNR/2024/0020

4 The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a modern terraced house situated within a small development of similar properties about ½ mile south of the centre of Farnham.

11. There is a full range of amenities in the town including a mainline railway station and easy access to the A31.

12. The accommodation includes a Living/Dining Room, Kitchen, WC, 2 Bedrooms, family Bathroom and ensuite Bathroom. Outside there is a Garage and Garden.

13. The EPC rating is ‘D’ and the certificate states that the property is double glazed and has gas-fired central heating. Submissions 14. The tenancy agreement supplied is dated 3rd January 2021 at a rent of £1,075 per month.

15. The [NAME] states that the kitchen doors, plinths and handles are due to be replaced in March, that the kitchen and bathroom fittings are original but in good order and that the property was redecorated and had new carpets fitted prior to the tenancy in 2015.

16. The Agent refers to 3 recent lettings in the same development at rents from £1,325 per month to £1,495 per month.

17. The Tenant also refers to comparable properties and states that she is prepared to pay the new rent requested once the kitchen has been refurbished but also provides photographs which show that the décor is tired, dated and in poor condition. Consideration and Valuation 18. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

19. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

20. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Farnham, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,350 per month.

21. However, the property is not in a condition to command such a rent and a number of deductions are necessary to reflect the accepted poor condition of the kitchen and other general wants of repair throughout the house.

CHI/43UL/MNR/2024/0020

5 22. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the poor condition of the kitchen merited a deduction of £100 per month and other general wants of repair a deduction of £50 per month. A total deduction of £150 per month.

23. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 24. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,200 per month.

25. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,200 per month should take effect from 3rd February 2024 this being the date specified in the notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal [NAME] to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant refers the landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal.
  • The fair market rent is adjusted based on the property's condition.
  • The fair market rent is determined according to the Housing Act 1988.
  • The fair market rent takes into account comparable rents in the area.
  • The property's condition and features are considered in determining the fair market rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No specific factors listed as all similar cases favored the claimant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,200 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local market rents, adjusting the rent accordingly.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, particularly section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property, especially the kitchen, was a significant factor in determining the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, who argued for a lower rent due to the property's condition.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property when disputing a rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs showing the condition of the property were important in the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.