Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenancy
📌 In brief
In a recent case, a tenant challenged a landlord's proposed rent increase of £850 per month. The First-tier Tribunal reviewed the case and set a new market rent of £825 per month, effective from April 1st, 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant may refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal for determination of a fair market rent.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge a proposed rent increase. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under an assured tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a new market rent of £825 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from April 1st, 2024, following a tenant's challenge to a landlord's proposed rent increase.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0083
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Taunton, Somerset, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], The Old Workshop, [ADDRESS], Ilminster, Somerset, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 825.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 12 January 2021
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises 2 bedroom flat
[NAME] of Decision 17 July 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0083 Property : [ADDRESS] Somerset [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : [RESPONDENT] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
17th July 2024
DECISION
CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0083
2 Summary of Decision 1. On 17th July 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £825 per month to take effect from 1st April 2024.
Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 28th February 2024 the [NAME] served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £850 per month in place of the existing rent of £575 per month to take effect from 1st April 2024. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 26th March 2024 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 12th June 2024 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 17th July 2024 based on the written representations received.
9. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be
CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0083
3 expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in
CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0083
4 subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a modern terraced house within a residential development about 1 mile north of the centre of Taunton.
11. The accommodation is listed as including a Hall, Living Room, Conservatory, Kitchen, Landing, 2 Bedrooms and a Bathroom with WC. Outside there is a small garden and 2 Car spaces.
12. The Energy Performance Rating for the property is ‘E’ and the Certificate states that the property has double glazed windows and electric room heaters. The Council Tax Band is ‘B’. Submissions 13. The initial tenancy began on 12th January 2021 at a rent of £575 per month which remained until the Notice was served.
14. The [NAME]’s submission states that there are no white goods or curtains supplied by the Landlord, that a bedroom heater was replaced by the Landlord in 2022 and that the front door and lounge heater have both been replaced this year. The Agent acknowledges that there is a leak beneath the sink and the back gate needs a repair for which quotations from contractors are awaited.
15. The Agent submitted an external photograph of the property and details of another property in the same road that was recently advertised to let for £895 per month including white goods. Consideration and Valuation 16. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
17. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. In this regard the Tribunal relies on comparable evidence of similar properties in the locality, such lettings would normally require the property to be in good condition with floorcoverings, curtains and basic white goods, fridge, washing machine and cooker, all included.
18. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.
19. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Taunton, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let
CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0083
5 today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £875 per month.
20. However, the property is let without curtains or white goods and this notional open market rent needs to be adjusted to reflect these factors.
21. Using it’s experience the Tribunal decided that the starting notional rent of £875 per month should be reduced by £20 per month to reflect the Tenant’s provision of curtains and £30 per month the reflect the Tenant’s provision of white goods.
22. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 23. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £825 per month.
24. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £825 per month should take effect from 1st April 2024, this being the date specified in the notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £825 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £950 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £800 for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant referred the landlord’s notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
- The fair market rent takes into account the condition and location of the property.
- The fair market rent is adjusted for the property's condition.
- A willing landlord might reasonably expect a certain rental amount for a property with specific conditions.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant did not refer the landlord’s notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent of £825 per month for the tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the written representations and compared the property to similar ones in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant argued that the proposed rent increase was too high compared to similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who successfully challenged the proposed rent increase.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can challenge a proposed rent increase by referring it to the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and details of similar properties in the area were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
