VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £2000 per month, effective from January 2024, after reviewing the property's condition and comparing it to similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they are paying. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous tribunal decision or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent of £2000 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from January 2024, after considering comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AU/MNR/2024/0030

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [APPELLANT] 4 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 2000 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3 January 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 3 September 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord As per inventory

9. Description of premises Ground floor flat with 3 rooms kitchen and bathroom

[NAME] of Decision 8 March 2024

1

Case Reference

: HS/LON/00AU/MNR/2024/0030

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Miss [APPELLANT] &

Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 21 December 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME]

Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 8 March 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £2000 per calendar month with effect from 3 January 2024. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On 21 November 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 2555.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 1585.65 per month to take effect from 3 Janaury 2024.

2. On 21 December 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 8 March 2024.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal held a hearing on 8 March 2024 and heard from both parties.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £2500.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. The dated kitchen and bathroom fittings and defects in the internal decor.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

PCM AST Market rent 2,500.00 £ less condition/terms 20.0% 500.00 -£ 2,000.00 £

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £2000 per calendar month.

3 Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £2000.00 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £2000.00 to take effect on 3 January 2024 this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: [NAME]: 8 March 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £2000 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property to similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the condition of the property were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.