First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £1,900 per month after considering the property's condition and market rent values.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the open market value adjusted for the property's condition and the tenant's obligations.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the property's condition and the terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the state of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,900 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and market rent values.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BG/MNR/2025/0653
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Judge A Dutton Mrs S Redmond MRICS
Landlord [COMPANY] 45 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ £1,900 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13th May 2025
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20/1/2023
6. Length of the term or rental period Initial fixed term of 6 months and then continuing as a contractual periodic tenancy on a monthly basis.
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished
9. Description of premises second floor flat within a 3 storey and basement terrace house c.1900. 2 beds, kitchen, living room, bathroom/wc, central heating, single glazed.
Chairman Judge Dutton Date of Decision 13th May 2025
(c)
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BG/MNR/2025/0653 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] Landlord : [NAME] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge Dutton Mrs S F Redmond MRICS Date and venue of Consideration : Paper case 13 May 2025 Date of Summary Reasons : 13 May 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,900 per calendar month with effect from 13 May 2025 ____________________________________
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 21 November 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,309 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,272 per month to take effect from 20 January 2025
2. On 12 December 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 6 January 2025.
(c)
2
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The tenant Mr. [APPELLANT] completed and returned the reply form sent to him with the directions from the tribunal. He indicated that the property was in good condition but that there was a problem with bed bugs and that the windows were not double glazed. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2000 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to the repairing obligations of the tenant, limited though they may be to what would appear to be internal decorations and some minor issues such as glass repair. The tenant says the property is in good condition save for alleged infestation issues
6. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£2000 per month
Less Deductions for obligations under the tenancy agreement say £100 per month
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of 1900 per calendar month.
Decision
8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,900 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,900 to take effect on 20 January 2025 this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase The tenant gave no indication of hardship if the rent ran from this date and indeed it is understood that the landlord may only charge the rent shown on the application to increase.
Chairman: Judge Dutton
Date: 13 May 2025
(c)
3
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Basement Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £1,050.00 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: Factors Considered
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy Agreement
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the open market rent.
- The property's good condition was a factor in setting the market rent.
- The tenant's repairing obligations, such as internal decorations and minor glass repair, led to a deduction from the market rent.
- The new rent was set to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice of increase.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,900 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market rent values and the condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the need to adjust the rent based on the property's condition and market conditions.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market rent values when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the condition of the property and the landlord's proposal for a new rent.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
