VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £800, effective from April 1, 2023, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the periodic nature of the tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match the original, except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent registration for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the monthly rent at £800 effective April 1, 2023, under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/30UK/MNR/2023/0120

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and

Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies

(Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were

107 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] & Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable Not Applicable Per Not Applicable

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1st November 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period monthlty

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per landlord and tenant act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

Cooker, floor coverings

9. Description of premises

A Large terraced property constructed of brick under a tiled roof. There are two downstairs

reception rooms downstairs and four bedrooms (2 double, 1 single, 2 small single) upstairs,

together with bathroom/wc. There is a rear yard and small front garden. The general

condition of the property is fair notwithstanding compliance with a recent improvement

notice. It is situated near limited local amenities and within easy walking distance of Preston

City centre.

[NAME] BA, LL.M Date of Decision 8 September 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £800, effective from April 1, 2023.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which governs rent registration for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 for determining the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is registered according to the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The description of the premises and the terms of the tenancy agreement were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.