VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy after a dispute arose over the amount. The tribunal set the monthly rent at £950, excluding water rates and council tax but including other specified amounts. This decision helps clarify the financial terms of the rental agreement.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 when there is a dispute over the amount.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, an application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent amount and period for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, resolving a dispute between the landlord and tenant. The decision took effect on September 1, 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0180

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [COMPANY] C/O [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Rafiya Mirza

1. The rent is: £950 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1.9.23

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 May 2022

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs S. 11

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Part furnished.

8. Description of premises 9th floor studio flat with access to shared facilities in modern development.

Chairman [NAME] of Decision 8.2.24

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant disputes the rent amount with the landlord.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent amount for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were in dispute over the rent amount.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal reviewed evidence and set the rent at £950 per month based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was used to determine the rent.

What argument mattered most?

The application of Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 in setting a fair and reasonable rent amount.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It is not specified which party initiated the case, but the tribunal's decision sets the rent at £950 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent dispute can seek a determination from the First-tier Tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tribunal likely reviewed lease agreements and other relevant documentation to determine the appropriate rent amount.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal, but specific rules apply.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.