FTT Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £273.96 per week, effective from 2 October 2023. This decision was based on comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
The FTT must determine the rent at which a property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy. This determination takes into account the periods of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy except for the rent amount. Additionally, certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant and the condition of the property are considered when determining the rent.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The FTT determined the market rent for a property in London based on comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, setting the rent at £273.96 per week effective from 2 October 2023. The decision was based on comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BG/MNR/2023/0404
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge M [NAME]
Landlord [COMPANY], 4 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 273.96 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 02 October 2023
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 February 2016
6. Length of the term or rental period Initial fixed term of 12 months, extendable by 1 year, and then continuing as a contractual periodic tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished
9. Description of premises First floor flat within purpose-built block. 2 bedrooms. Open plan kitchen / living room. 1 bathroom/WC. Central heating. No outside space.
Chairman Judge M Jones Date of Decision 15 January 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BG/MNR/2023/0404 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Landlord : [COMPANY] Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] of [NAME] :
Market rent determination in accordance with section 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal members : Judge M [NAME] of decision : 15 January 2024 Date of Reasons : 27 January 2024
REASONS FOR DECISION
2 Decision of the tribunal
The FTT determines the rent to be £273.96 per week, with effect from 2 October 2023. Background 1. On 27 September 2023 the Tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal (“FTT”) referring a notice proposing a new rent under his assured periodic tenancy of the Property.
2. The notice, which was served under section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) and was dated 21 August 2023, proposed a rent of £273.96 per week with effect from 2 October 2023.
3. Neither party sent written representations to the FTT regarding the [NAME], and neither party requested an oral hearing.
4. The tenancy commenced on 29 February 2016. The Tenant remains in occupation as a statutory periodic tenant. The current rent payable is £256.04 per week. Inspection 5. Neither party having requested an inspection, the FTT did not inspect the Property. The Law
6. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Act, the FTT is required to determine the rent at which it considers the Property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy on the same terms as the actual tenancy ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. The FTT is also required to take into account (a) the condition of the Property, save to the extent that any disrepair is due to the Tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy and (b) the terms of the tenancy. Valuation 7. The starting point is to determine the rent which the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market in the condition considered usual for a modern letting (“the initial valuation”).
3 8. There was no specific comparable rental evidence from the Landlord or the Tenant. When calculating the initial valuation, the FTT decided to rely upon its own knowledge and experience. The range of rents for 2- bedroom properties in the neighbourhood, unfurnished, and in good condition seemed to be in the region of £1,180 to £1,200 per month, or £272.31 to £276.92 per week.
9. Having considered its own general knowledge of market rental levels for comparable properties in the area in which the Property is situated, the FTT arrived at an initial valuation of £273.96 per week.
10. The FTT had no evidence or representations before it to enable it to consider [NAME] any Adjustments to this initial valuation to take into account (a) the actual condition of the Property and (b) the differences (if any) between the terms of this letting and the terms of a standard assured shorthold tenancy.
11.
Accordingly, the Market Rent for the Property, determined by the FTT for the purposes of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, is £273.96 per calendar month with effect from 2 October 2023, being the date that the new rent was to take effect pursuant to the Landlord’s notice.
Name:
Judge M Jones
Date:
27 January 2024
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.
• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
• If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4 • The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) FTT Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Case: Property Condition and Financial Hardship Considered
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: £460 per Week Effective April 1, 20…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the new rent based on its own knowledge and experience of market rental levels.
- The tribunal found that the proposed rent of £273.96 per week was consistent with market rates for similar properties.
- The new rent takes effect from the date proposed in the landlord's notice.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Neither party provided evidence or arguments for adjusting the initial rent valuation based on the property's actual condition or tenancy terms.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy should be £273.96 per week.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider comparable rental evidence and the condition of their property when determining market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
